similar to: SV: Using regcontext

Hello List Ive been trying to use regcontext, but I cant get it to work. Ive setup my sip peers to have the regexten _[0-9]., so that I can capture all registrations in a single extension. But when they register, I can see that the dynamic extension is created, but none of the rest of the code is executed, priority 2-4. Can anyone explain how I should use the regcontext parameter, etc. am I using

Can you then inform me on what structures this information is stored in, in the asterisk code? Then ill try to do a quick dirty version of the replication. Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Kevin P. Fleming Sendt: 9. juni 2006 16:25 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Recently I've noticed two bits of odd behavior with respect to regcontext/regexten in CVS HEAD & 1.2 Beta1, and I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on this. I've set up a regcontext in sip.conf. I've set up two users with regexten entries, one in sip.conf and one in a mysql realtime table. The first bit of oddness is that regexten seems to work somewhat as described

I should note that we are not running the Digium g729 implementation, but the intel one. Also, to not angry people, this ofcourse isn't used in our production environment, only for testing if we want g.729. Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Moises Silva Sendt: 14. juni 2006 15:18 Til:

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > JR Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:49 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] RE: regcontext,NoOp extension > vanishes when extension reload > > > > > Let me guess: The

That's just the thing, and it sucks, because the VoIP implementation actually works very good. Jon _____ Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af list mail Sendt: 8. juni 2006 02:34 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Emne: Re: SV: [Asterisk-Users] I can hear only one way when I use

Just figured it out, I think. I put regcontext=mycontext into the [general] section in sip.conf instead of the the [user] section and when the sip user registered, the NoOp extension priority 1 came right up in the dial plan. All is well again, so far. Clarity of sight becomes infinitely greater with head removed from rectum. >> > Hi All, > > I've been trying to get

Hello I can save you a lot of time, and tell you that it wont work. It does hold some registration information in the asterisk database, but most of the information is kept internally in Asterisk. Just FYI. Jon _____ Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Shenen Shenen Sendt: 9. juni 2006 11:37 Til:

Hi Anyone know how to use regcontext et regexten parameter from sip.conf and can give an example ? thx regards Harry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090807/ef9ba45e/attachment.htm

Hi All, I'm working with regcontext and sip users/peers. In the wiki, the example shows you can put this parameter in the [sipuser] context, like so: [general] lots of general parameters [sipuser] regcontext=siptest regexten=1234 Now this does not create the Noop exten priority 1 in the dial plan when the sip user registers. Now if I put regcontext in the [general] section, the sip user

Hi All, I've been trying to get regexten and regcontext going for some sip peers but following the examples on the wiki is not working, as far as I can tell, nothing is happening. the phone registers, sip show peers is ok, but the NoOp priority 1 extension never gets created or added to the dialplan. Has anyone got this working? Thanks. JR JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses

Hi ho, is there anyone out here that is making use of the regcontext and regexten settings in sip.conf? I've tried this on two Asterisk boxes (1.2.10 and 1.2.12.1) and in both cases I don't see the Noop priority 1 being created upon SIP client registration, "show dialplan xxx" reveals no change. And yes, I have also read and checked bug 7144; if I go down that route and no

Hello Be aware that the Nokia E60, E61 and E70 does not support NAT. Just to be shure that you know that. A clever choice from Nokia, so that users has to have some local equipment from the telco. Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af John Joseph Sendt: 7. juni 2006 13:59 Til: Asterisk Users

Hello Olivier Ive been testing the E61 phone for some days now, and we need to have an inhouse asterisk server, connected to our main asterisk server, to get it to work. That means, that you cant just walk down to your local airport, and use the IP part of the phone on their network. You have to have a non nat local server, to get it to run. Other than that, the phone can accept calls both

Hi All, I just noticed something interesting. When a sip device registers and regcontext is setup in sip.conf, a NoOp priority 1 extension is dynamically created in the dialplan within the specified regcontext. Works great. If for some reason, modification is made to the extension.conf and a >reload extension is performed, those dynamically created extensions in the regcontext vanish. Now

hi all, just wondering what's happening here: i have a pap2 and an spa941. everytime i call my spa from my pap2 i can see it being added dynamically on the regcontext: [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Saved useragent "Linksys/SPA942-5.2.8" for peer 100100 [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Added extension '100100' priority 1 to sipregcontext but from spa to pap2 i dont see it, i looked

Hello As far as ive understood, you can just write Exten => s,n,GotoIf([${AVAILSTATUS} = 1]?autoanswer:fail) ${AVAILSTATUS} would return 1, and "${AVAILSTATUS}" would return "1" Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Brian Capouch Sendt: 27. juni 2006 09:10 Til:

Hello Is it correct that IAX2 uses more CPU, than SIP? Also, can it be true that IAX2 is much more sensitive against high CPU loads? Also, does Asterisk support and use multiprocessor architectures, such as Xeon? ? Regards Jon -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 12-06-2006

OK this was an easy one to fix. All I had to do is RTFM. Note on the wiki: ATTENTION: Make sure you take a look at bug report 7144 Just do what Kevin said, include the regcontext in whatever static context you have the priority 2 extension and don't make a static regcontext in extension.conf. Let sip module do the rest. Works great. Thanks Guys. JR On 12/5/06, JR Richardson

Hello list, I would like to seek your expert opinion on a setup I am trying as part of my research. I have not been able to successfully make a call so far. In my setup, I use two laptops that are interconnected by means of a stand-alone IS1581 switch. Thus there is no LAN involved. I have assigned static IPs to the two laptops, say 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2. I have installed Asterisk 1.6.2.6 and