similar to: RE: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 169

Having built libtheora-1.0alpha3, I tried it out on a 46 second long, 161 MByte raw dv format video clip. First, I copied these lines from ogg-theora-microhowto.html <snip> mplayer -ao pcm -aofile stream.wav -vo null file_to_be_encoded.avi & mplayer -vo yuv4mpeg -ao null -nosound file_to_be_encoded.avi & encoder_example -v 1 -a 1 stream.wav stream.yuv > theora_file.ogg

2.4.18 kernel) using 3 x 60GB WD 7200 IDE drives on a 7500-4 controller I could get peak I/O of 452 MBytes/sec, and a sustainable I/O rate of over 100 MBytes/sec. That is not exactly a 'dunno' performance situation. These tests were done using dbench and RAID5. Let's get that right: 100 MBytes/sec == 800 Mbits/sec, which is just a tad over 100 Mbits/sec (the bottleneck if you use

I'm relaying an icecast1 mp3 stream with icecast2. This works fine, and the song title is displayed correctly no matter if I use <relay-shoutcast-metadata>1</> or not on the relay. But, the stream name and other metadata provided by ices0 on the icecast1 server is not displayed in the listening client. Icecast1 source: [Id: 1] [Sock: 11] [Time of connect: 09/Aug/2004:10:01:24]

Hello everybody, althought there are a lot of discussions on Samba's performance, I would like to share my results trying to connect Samba running on a Linux box to a Win95 workstation on a fast ethernet network. If any of you could have some ideas or suggestions , please mail me (cc: teo@flex.ro) because I am not (yet) on this mail list. First of all, may I present you : 1. THE SERVER -

I found that for a modern PC running zero loads, (my server is a P4 3.2 with 512 M dual channel RAM an Intel Etherpro Express 100 nic, serving cached disk files from RAM) samba could be 30% slower than it should be. It would serve data at about 7 MBytes/sec compared with the old NT4 sever (same Intel nic, 512 RAM, P2/266 Cpu, NT4 with SP6a) that would do it at 10 Mbytes/sec under all

Unable to install packages in R: Error in if (any(diff)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed Sorry for my bad english I need help in solving the following problem with R When I try to install a package it end with the following error msg: Error in if (any(diff)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed the enviroment in windows 7 xp1 x64 R-3.4.1 was just installed R was started with

Hi, I have a problem with a large data set wrapped in a reference class. I do that to access the data by reference from within various functions in a script. # The class definition: setRefClass("data", fields = list(h5_df = "list", training_data = "array",

Hi! Today I found that a user can successfully login on a homes share despite that share should be disabled. To quote smb.conf(1): available (S) This parameter lets you "turn off" a service. If avail- able = no, then ALL attempts to connect to the service will fail. Such failures are logged. However, see the following: % walter@qdevel2:/home/walter> smbclient

Hi, I am trying to load kernel 2.6.6 on a Soekris net4521 from the network using PXE. I built my initrd with mkinitrd. RedHat nash (while running linuxrc) hangs after mounting /proc and says "Creating block devices". I am using the pxelinux.0 from the syslinux-2.10 distribution and the kernel and initrd were built on redhat 9.0. I built my kernel with BLK_DEV_RAM, RAMFS, TMPFS,

Hi, I'm using R to collect data for a number of exchanges through a socket connection and constantly running into memory problems even though task I believe is not that memory consuming. I guess there is a miscommunication between R and WinXP about freeing up memory. So this is the code: for (x in 1:length(exchanges.to.get)) { tickers<-sqlQuery(channel,paste("SELECT Symbol

Hi, I am testing tinc for a very large scale deployment. I am using tinc-1.1 for testing. test results below are for tinc in switch mode. all other settings are default. test is performed in LAN env. 2 different hosts. I am getting only 24.6 Mbits/sec when tinc is used. without tinc on the same hosts/link I get 95 to 100 Mbits/sec using iperf. Over Tinc: iperf -c 192.168.9.9 -b 100m -l 32k -w

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are

Hello, I can't think of an explanation for this memory allocation behaviour and was hoping someone on the list could help out. Setup: ------ R version 2.8.1, 32-bit Ubuntu 9.04 Linux, Core 2 Duo with 3GB ram Description: ------------ Inside a for loop, I am passing a list to a function. The function accesses various members of the list. I understand that in this situation, the entire

If you're using StrictSubnets, you will still be fine. StrictSubnets means that A will only use B's key (which C does not know) to send packets to B's statically configured subnets. C cannot impersonate B (as in, take its node name) because it would have to know B's private key to do so, and it cannot impersonate B's subnets because A is using StrictSubnets. The worst that C

connection will remain a TCP connection unless it is broken and restarted. Usually if I stop the client and wait for about 30 seconds to reconnect, there is a much greater chance that the MTU probes work fine, and in about 30 seconds MTU is fixed to 1416. Every time when the MTU probing fails, I see latency between 700 - 1000 ms with 32 byte pings over a LAN. Every time when the MTU probing does

Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc ''that is also below''. The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external network. Both tests were run at the same time. The links are policed at 6.0M ''by our provider''. 192.168.70.1 --> 192.168.30.1 My question is: If using a prio qdisc should''nt the iperf run with a tos of b8 have

Greetings all, We are proud to announce the release of LDTP 1.7.0. This release features number of important breakthroughs in LDTP as well as in the field of Test Automation. This release note covers a brief introduction on LDTP followed by the list of new features and major bug fixes which makes this new version of LDTP the best of the breed. Useful references have been included at the end of

On 09/03/2016 10:56 AM, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > C will still need keys in order to establish metaconnections with A and B (as > well as a few other things). However there is no need for C to own any > "Subnets" at all. If somebody breaks into C, he could get access to the vpn network, right? Because the keys are there, it will be possible to use them to get access. Even if

C will still need keys in order to establish metaconnections with A and B (as well as a few other things). However there is no need for C to own any "Subnets" at all. On 3 September 2016 at 06:21, Armin <armin at melware.de> wrote: > On 09/02/2016 08:51 PM, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > > What version of tinc are you using? tinc 1.1 already does what you want > out of

Running rsync 2.6.9-1.el4.rf on CentOS 4.4 client and remote server. Backing up user data from 2 different clients using following: su - $HOSTID -c 'rsync -azr --timeout=600 --log-file=$DEBUGFILE --log-file-format="%o %f %b %l %i" --stats --delete --bwlimit=$BANDWDT --rsh="ssh -P ____" $STAGE $TARGET:$TARGETDIR' Using "bytes sent"/"literal data"