similar to: 911 @ Zap Channel Breakin

Hey all, It such a shame that BRI technology is such a flop in the USA. For a small office such as mine it would be a great product. So her goes my question.... What is a known asterisk working BRI card that will operate in the USA. I need to weigh price/quality. I need to do DID/DDI (or what ever you want to call it). Asterisk will do everything else I need. The ILEC has at the other

Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather (especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link explaining how to setup Linux server -- #Joseph

Hello all, I'm looking for software for my asterisk logs that will compile the information into nice web-based charts and graphs. Something that works similar to webalizer for apache. I want to be able to spot trends of usage, call volume levels, disconnect/failure levels, and basically see exactly where my system has been at over the past day/week/month, etc. . I would prefer for

Ok this is a simple question... What has been your experience with the WellTech 38xx series (I'm looking specifically at the 3802) VoIP gateway? I'm looking for a good (and hopefully not too expensive) VoIP/T.38 gateway for my office. Asterisk intergration is not a major factor at this time but may be later on. How well does it work? Is Echo a problem? Do the T.38 capablities

Ok here is a real geek question, I building my own linux kernel for my asterisk system and came across the kernel setting for the timer frequency. I have one of 3 hardcode choices 100Hz, 250 Hz and 1000Hz. From what I understand the default Freq was changed from 100Hz in kernel 2.4 to 1000Hz (1KHz) in kernel 2.6. Timing is a BIG issue in asterisk with all the TDM and zap channel stuff.

I have a TDM400P with 2 FXO cards and I'm using Asterisk@Home 2.8 I noticed that when I place a call to the analog lines from outside, Asterisk takes a while to actually ring the extension the call is being sen to. I've been doing some tests, calling from my cellphone and here is what I see... - After the first ring on my cell, Asterisk logs to the CLI that is has an incoming call -

I know this is cruel, but I figured out a way to break dovecot, temporarily. The really great news is that it recovers nicely. I'm also not sure if anything can be done about this, since I've seen the same thing happen with courier-imap, uw-imap, and maybe cyrus-imap. I used cyrus-imap for such a short period of time that I didn't get to really test it much. how to... (this

Hi all Does Digium make a quad BRI card? I can't see anything of the sort on their page but I thought they might call it something else in the States. Failing that, can anyone recommend a make/model that would handle 4 BRI ports? -- Cheers Wayne

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645 Bug ID: 13645 Summary: Improve efficiency when resuming transfer of large files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hello I already posted this in smb-clients, but seeing the load difference I repost in the samba list. I am currently using samba 3.0.10 with kernel 2.6.9. In the doc one is encouraged to use 'security = user' level. If I then connect with 'smbclient //machine/share -U myname%mypass' all works well. But when I try to mount the share localy with smbmount //machine/share

Hello, We have several clients with GXP2000 in their network and behind NAT. We have one particular client that has several GXP2000 behind a Linksys RV082 VPN Firewall/Router which is doing NAT services. According to SIP packet inspection, it detects it's a symmetric NAT. The problem we have is that even though we have configured Asterisk AND the GXP2000 to register every 60 minutes, they

While not strictly on topic I think this could be an interesting opportunity for the Asterisk development community. As some of you might already know JavaOne will be happening in San Francisco in 2 weeks time http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf/ I wanted to draw your attention to an interesting company that will be exhibiting there called www.Savaje.com <http://www.savaje.com/> more

Hai Mark, I see the bugreport for this is still untouched. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11998 Is vfs_full_audit not an option? with %I you can log the IP address of the client machine. But i dont know if that wil work of if vfs_full_audit hase that option. With something like this. full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%m|%S full_audit:failure = connect full_audit:success = connect

>From http://www.apache.org/info/20010519-hack.html: "The ssh client at SourceForge had been compromised to log outgoing names and passwords, so the cracker was thus able get a shell on apache.org." user's ssh --> SF's ssh --> apache.org's sshd So basically the user's password was entered in the clear to an untrusted program (SF's ssh). Never mind that

Crap. I hit send too fast. Last sentence in first paragraph should have read "no completely secure way" for authentication to be passed-- because the agent-based forwarding program could have been compromised as well--except for the cases already mentioned such as SRP and RSAAuth where the auth. information is better protected. Even if the SF server had been capable of forwarding the

All-- But it's not as simple as forwarding the password-based authentication. Regardless of what method was used to SSH from system one (user's) to system two (SF), the user then started up *a second* SSH session to go from two (SF) to three (Apache). There is no effective way for any authentication information from the first session to be passed to the second, in my mind. Remember

This may have been asked before, but I can't find it. I am getting repeated external attempted to log into our AD/DC (running Samba 4.4.14). In /var/log/samba/log.samba I get entried like: 2017/09/19 05:02:25.562957, 2] ../source4/auth/ntlm/auth.c:430(auth_check_password_recv) auth_check_password_recv: sam_ignoredomain authentication for user [HPRS\333] FAILED with error

All: Yesterday I discovered something interesting. I dialed 1800ANCESTRY from the asterisk system I am testing and got the number doesn't exist message. I then dialed the same number from our old system and it went through. I realized that the "Y" in ancestry made the number too long, and went back to my dialplan. How do I ignore numbers that are too long? Obviously,

On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 17:02 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Mark, > > I see the bugreport for this is still untouched. > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11998 I've closed that bug now. Extensive work has been done to add this feature to Samba 4.7, due out this week: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Audit_Logging Two new debug classes,

The trojaned ssh client is nothing new to the hacker community, and the statement in the previous thread claiming "This type of man-in-the-middle attack (trojaned ssh) is not theoretical anymore, and password authentication is broken." is an example of how many poeple still think "hacking" is something very difficult and nothing short of a genius is required to make the