similar to: exten statement execution order

Somebody know if they are down? Let me know, Julius C. Barber ventas@gringotel.com www.GringoTel.com Tel. USA: 1-408-705-1189 GringoTel - ahorre en sus llamadas internacionales. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060509/924605b6/attachment.htm

Hi Junaid, Sorry about the confusion, indeed I gave you the wrong output. So let's start to the beginning. I disabled quota and I reactivated it My configuration : Volume Name: venus Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: ylal3020:/soft/venus Brick2: ylal3030:/soft/venus Brick3: yval1000:/soft/venus Brick4:

I hope you'll all forgive me for displaying my severe lack of knowledge on this topic, and I can't really provide much in the way of reproducible code. A colleague of mine has asked if I know how to import an S object into R. The object is stored in a file named 'pre3.f' When I open the file as a text document I get what's printed below. Being one of those young bucks with

On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: > Likely because 2.6.3 is not a current release. 2.7.2 (or 3?) is rhe current version, and it makes little sense to backport changes. Tim, It's possible that these changes didn't make it in. I admit that would be my knee-jerk reaction to seeing an older version number, but the last occurrence of

Hi, Back in 2011, it was reported that Liebert PSA devices persist in reporting OB (On Battery) when using usbhid-ups regardless of the actual state. Pier Paolo did some work (2011) which reportedly solved the issue. However, that doesn't seem to have reached mainstream and I now face the same problem. I'm using NUT 2.6.3 with a new Liebert PSA 1500Va that only ever reports OB and

Likely because 2.6.3 is not a current release. 2.7.2 (or 3?) is rhe current version, and it makes little sense to backport changes. Nut is a trivial compile . . . 'Use the source, Luke . . .' - Tim On October 17, 2014 6:05:35 PM CDT, Derek Harding <derek at lagham.org.uk> wrote: >Hi, > >Back in 2011, it was reported that Liebert PSA devices persist in >reporting OB

I guess it's kind of a natural response on my part, working professionally in software. T-Shooting step one: Get current and see if the problem persists. If it does,then step rwo: debug. 2+ years is forever in software, noting that 2.6.3 was mid 2012 . . . - Tim On October 17, 2014 9:38:15 PM CDT, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: >On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Tim Dawson

Begin forwarded message: > From: "Paul Smith" > Subject: Liebert PSA UPS problem. > Date: July 31, 2013 4:42:33 PM EDT > To: <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org> > > Hi all, > A brief summary: > > I have a new Liebert PSA UPS which I wanted to help support my FreeNAS box (a FreeBSD 8 variant). Unfortunately the nut-ups implementation here for

I have a matrix of p-values for for each explanatory variable. Each row is an area of the response variable and each column is an explanatory variable. e.g. PSA pval_DOY pval_PDSIconcurrent pval_PDSIantecedent_annual_average pval_TMAXanomaly pval_FM100anomaly 1 NC06 0.96747495 0.6092668 0.53353019 0.9301115 0.99801334 2 NC04 0.04699659

This patch adds support for the following ups to liebert-hid.c: $ lsusb | grep Liebert Bus 007 Device 005: ID 10af:0001 Liebert Corp. PowerSure PSA UPS Using this patch, I'm able to obtain information about the ups via upsc: $ upsc upsname battery.charge: 100 battery.runtime: 1012 battery.type: PbAc battery.voltage: 1172 battery.voltage.nominal: 12 driver.name: usbhid-ups

Commit-ID: d87680c971e35a218ca10941c6014ae9861e6a55 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=d87680c971e35a218ca10941c6014ae9861e6a55 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:39:47 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] [BUILTIN] Exit without

Commit-ID: 85a5a4a9d96c0c680597432f1e4454718e7ad101 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=85a5a4a9d96c0c680597432f1e4454718e7ad101 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:39:47 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: [BUILTIN] Exit

Problem: I keep getting: "Error in (index - 9):index : argument of length 0" when I run this code in an automated loop, but when I step through it by hand, I have no problems. It keep crashing when i<-10. I cannot figure this out to save my life! Please help and THANK YOU in advance! variables: FM100 is a matrix of columns: year, day (all years set to 366 days), region 1, region

Commit-ID: bb0a62dfa61fec6497f1409c3cdfe8ceec94f1fa Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=bb0a62dfa61fec6497f1409c3cdfe8ceec94f1fa Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Sat, 19 May 2018 02:39:38 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: main: Only set

Hi all, This is just a PSA that as of r302752, 3 parallel algorithms (for_each, for_each_n, and sort) are available in llvm/Support/Parallel.h. Effort was made to match the C++ Parallelism TS N4507 [ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4507.pdf] as closely as possible, but some aspects were intentionally omitted. No support is added for the executor proposal N4406 [

Hi I'm new to stats and R, so can you please help me or guide me building ROC curve in an elaborate way with codes I loaded ROCR package, but I'm not sure how to use it. Requirement To build ROC curve using only PSA(variable) alone of the original cohort against the ROC of the Model of the original cohort. It would be really great if you could help me with this. Thanks

Hi, I got a forced update when pulling today. If I merge master to a local branch, I get a bunch of add/add conflicts. This same commit exists under several hashes: https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/commit/687841777ef505 https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507/commit/74725885552 Did someone push -f to the monorepo after doing branch surgery? Maybe there was a

At Microsoft, we believe that we gain a competitive advantage by making the Visual Studio versioning story as complicated as possible. To wit: The compiler in the first VS 2015 release was version 19.00. For each update/hotfix release, we bumped that version by .01. When VS 2017 was released, we decided to keep the major compiler version the same to signify backwards-binary-compatibility with the

It's hard to say. By definition it appears undefined (in the sense that the TS literally does not define it), but on the other hand it is a TS and this issue would (hopefully) come up and be specified before it made it to standardization. Supporting recursive parallel calls certainly seems like desirable behavior, so from my point of view it would be nice to make sure it works. Not sure if

Commit-ID: 0d63aab8d433cd244e221aee978d2bcd4153cd1a Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=0d63aab8d433cd244e221aee978d2bcd4153cd1a Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:52:02 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: eval: Only