similar to: Installing MS JVM

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Installing MS JVM"

2007 Nov 01
1
using Unicode characters
Hi all :-P , I want to browse Arabic characters with Wine, but i noticed that wine don't show them perfectly, although i installed extra font to it (i copied windows fonts and put them in .wine folder in home path). How i can solve this problem? -- Best Regards ?????? Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi ???? ???? ??????? My Blog ?????? http://hali-sy.com/
2005 Jul 27
2
oh323 geting voice problem g729 xeon 2.8 , fedora 1 , asterisk 1.0.6
Abwesenheitsnotiz: [Asterisk-Users] oh323 geting voice problem g729 xeon 2.8 , fedora 1 , asterisk 1.0.6Hi All I am using oh323 with 6.6 virsion , and runing under xeon 2.8 dual with 2 gb ram, with g729 for i686 , (fedora 1). my problem is sip - oh323 - h323 (quintum) - pstn , sip party can listen otherparty realtime voice , but other party geting sip party's voice 1 sec later (not
2017 Jun 22
1
hpc r configure not recognizing zlib
System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) I?ve installed zlib 1.2.11 on the home folder of a Red Hat HPC as part of the process for installing R base 3.4.0. I get this error even after successful install of zlib checking for inflateInit2_ in -lz... no checking whether zlib support suffices... configure: error: zlib library and headers are required I?ve checked R
2006 Jul 17
10
String manipulation and formatting
I'm trying to write a simple function that does the following: [command] xify(5.2) [output] XXX.XX [command] xify(3) [output] XXX Any simple solutions (without using python/perl/unix script/...)? Thanks, Saghir --------------------------------------------------------- Legal Notice: This electronic mail and its attachments are i...{{dropped}}
2005 Mar 01
2
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM to target the JVM
Hi, I'm interested in using LLVM to run source languages supported by GCC (mostly just C and Fortran, actually) on a JVM. There seem to be two general ways this could be accomplished. 1. LLVM bytecodes could be compiled to JVM bytecodes 2. LLVM bytecodes could be interpreted by a program running on a JVM Has anybody started work in either direction? Has anyone started work on anything
2012 Jun 19
0
[R-sig-Geo] Help in simultaneous equations
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Saima Bashir <saimabashir11 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Sarah, > > I have installed and loaded them into R but get same error. > > I am using four equations, cross-section data, version R i386 2.15.0. That is by no means all the information I requested in my original reply, or all that is requested in the posting guide. Nobody can help you
2009 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
On Sunday 29 November 2009 02:06:04 you wrote: > > So it will stack overflow on tail calls > > At the moment, yes. But then again, so does java. Sure but a lot of people like me are using LLVM precisely because it offers these wonderful features. As long as your JVM backend does not handle these features correctly its utility is greatly diminished. > Also, it looks like
2010 Aug 03
1
Bug#591537: xen: FTBFS on sparc: Scilab cannot open JVM library.
Source: xen Version: 4.0.1~rc5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: debian-sparc at lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc Hi, your package no longer builds on sparc: | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-sivp_0.5.2-2-sparc-3aHxSt/sivp-0.5.2' | SCI_DISABLE_TK=1 SCI_JAVA_ENABLE_HEADLESS=1 DOCBOOK_ROOT=/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl/nwalsh \ | /usr/bin/scilab -nw -f
2005 Mar 18
15
Meetme2 compilation problem
Hi All, I am trying to compile meetme2 in my asterisk box and getting the following compilaton error. Please help me to sort it out. cc -fPIC -c -o app_dial.o app_dial.c In file included from app_dial.c:14: /usr/include/asterisk/lock.h: In function `ast_mutex_init': /usr/include/asterisk/lock.h:317: `PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
2011 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] JVM bytecode generation vs. LLVM
Sorry if I'm repeating something that was already said. I was just thinking "why the heck do I seem headed for JVM generation if what I want to use is LLVM", and this is the result: I'm coming from a Java background. I'm using Eclipse, I'm used to the syntax highlighting, cross referencing and refactoring support that Eclipse offers. I know I will want to have the
2012 Jun 15
1
R under JVM
Dear all, first of all I apologize for not having changed the object. I just re-used an old email I sent some time ago. The let us go into the question. Our architecture is the following: A (set of) java programs running under a jvm that passes data and instructions to an R instance via RNI and at the end of the process extracts calculated data from R. The question is: can I
2008 Jan 06
1
tomcat still sees jvm version 1.4.2 in Cent OS 5
i chose to install tomcat during the OS install as well as java....however, since I needed to use a different jvm, i used the method described in http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS for Sun jdk 1.5.0_13 and it worked fine as I can tell, as using the alternatives --config java command, i see both 1.4.2 and 1.5.0 versions and choosing the 1.5.0 version yields the right version when doing a
2005 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM to target the JVM
On Feb 28, 2005, at 19:16, Curt Cox wrote: > I'm interested in using LLVM to run source languages supported by GCC > (mostly just C and Fortran, actually) on a JVM. There seem to be two > general ways this could be accomplished. Here is a better way to do this. At least, I think it is better, mostly because someone else has already done all the work: http://www.xwt.org/mips2java/
2009 Nov 24
2
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
Hi, I've written a backend for LLVM that allows LLVM IR to be transformed to a Java/JVM class file (llvm-jvm.patch.gz attached). Indirect function calls don't work yet, and there's probably some minor bugs in it, but it works well for the test cases that I've run through it. Also, several instructions are emulated by method calls due to deficiencies in the JVM instruction set
2006 Feb 15
1
Sun JVM 1.5 and CentOS latest kernel - regress?
I've been running a lot of apps with Sun's 1.5.0_03 JVM on CentOS 3.6. After the latest kernel update 2.4.21-37.0.1.ELsmp is seems I'm starting to get hangs. Just like I used to a year ago on an earlier kernel release. It looks like the infamous futex bug: strace -p 22406 Process 22406 attached - interrupt to quit futex(0x821be34, FUTEX_WAIT, 15, NULL <unfinished ...> Anyone
2009 Nov 29
5
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
> So it will stack overflow on tail calls At the moment, yes. But then again, so does java. Also, it looks like they're working on support for tail calls in the Da Vinci Machine[1]. > and break with run-time errors When I said it raises an assertion, I meant at compile-time. > on structs? No, structs are supported. The only unsupported types at the moment (as far as I am aware) are
2011 Dec 28
4
JVM 7 fails to start
Hi, I installed the jre-7u2 into the wine under Ubuntu 11.10 But, when I try to run the java itself: Code: wine ${PATH_TO_JAVA/BIN}/java.exe I get following error: Code: fixme:heap:HeapSetInformation (nil) 1 (nil) 0 Error occurred during initialization of VM java/io/IOException: Bad pathname Any hints? Help will be mostly appreciated, I need to run windows app, which uses JVM. Thanks.
2006 Feb 21
4
rekord id-je .create után
Hali! Mi a legegyszer?bb m?dja annak, hogy egy pl. note = Notes.create(...) ut?n megkapjam az adott note ActiveRecord id-j?t (primary key)? Sajnos ez ugye 0, mivel frissen lett l?trehozva... ?tlet? G?bor
2009 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
Hello, David First of all, thanks for the backend submission. I let Chris comment about the procedure of adding it to the tree. :) I just did a quick look into the code. The comments are below > Indirect function calls don't work yet, and there's probably some > minor bugs in it, but it works well for the test cases that I've run > through it. Could you please provide some
2009 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] JVM Backend
On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:20:39 David Roberts wrote: > > How do you handle tail calls and value types? > > I haven't worried too much about optimisation yet, so it doesn't do > anything special for tail calls (although neither does the java > compiler). LLVM types are translated to their equivalent java > primitive type (or currently it raises an assertion if