similar to: Seize phone line

Does asterisk support this? I have a location that I planned to only put a PRI line, but testing 911 (I called them first), I just get a hangup. Does 911 normally work over a PRI line? Anything special I have to setup in asterisk? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello list: Sorry for my ignorance but anyone could you tell me if is possible setting automatic transference or seize fsmo roles on samba4, to avoid manual action over server, such as HA, i mean in case that my fsmo role owner crash. Best regard.

I found on the web that there is way to customize the softkeys for the 7941/7961 phones. In the SEP<mac>.xml there is a section called "softKeyFile" where you can specify an xml file for the softkeys. I couldn't find any examples of this softkey file or the format to this file. Does anyone have a call manager enviroment where they can look at this file and send me an

On 3/31/2016 3:12 PM, IT Admin wrote: > Aaaaaaand more problems... Welcome to the continuing saga of FILER. > > It appears that neither SOA or NS records were updated during the process > of moving fsmo roles to CBADC01. SOA entries on all three active DCs point > to FILER. There aren't any NS records for any of the new DCs, only FILER. > In RSAT each DNS server's

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:17:41 +0300 Taner Tas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm testing to a seamless upgrade from 4.3.11 to 4.8.3 on my test > setup. Database migrating from 4.3.11 was successful. After > "samba-tool dbdcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes", 4.8.3 was launching ok > except replication (4.3.11 to 4.8.3 : WERR_BADFILE). After demoting >

On 4/5/2016 8:17 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: > For me: > - SOA means where updates can be sent. > - SOA can be one or several. > - NS is a record to help non-authoritative name servers to find a valid > name server for the zone they receive a request and they don't know > anything about that zone. > - SOA is often declared as NS, I agree. I explained this is not mandatory.

I have been discussing an asterisk solution with a company that has a custom written dialogic based solution. The issue is that their dialogic solution can read callerid from incoming calls, even if the callerid is blocked. I have read before that Asterisk can do this, and they want me to make sure that their new system will be able to do this. A quick poke around inside the zaptel source code

On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to contact for the domain records. > Using Bind-DLZ all DNS servers can modify the AD zones, they all reply "I > am the SOA" when you ask them about SOA for AD zones. Sorry, but this, as

Hi, Snom phones firmware 5.0 is now out. Try it if you like: http://www.snom.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Regards, --------------------------------------------------------------------- Usman Tahir snom technology AG www.snom.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Aaaaaaand more problems... Welcome to the continuing saga of FILER. It appears that neither SOA or NS records were updated during the process of moving fsmo roles to CBADC01. SOA entries on all three active DCs point to FILER. There aren't any NS records for any of the new DCs, only FILER. In RSAT each DNS server's properties show filer.cb.cliffbells.com is the primary server. This

Does anyone have any suggestions for connecting analog DID trunks? I have some small locations that will have 2 analog DID trunks each, the only solution that I can see will work will be using a channel bank and T1 card, but it will be close to $1500 to terminate these DID trunks. Was hoping someone had some experience using an ATA or TDM card and analog DID trunks. Rhino Channel Bank - $750 4

On 05/04/16 13:48, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 4/5/2016 8:17 AM, mathias dufresne wrote: >> For me: >> - SOA means where updates can be sent. >> - SOA can be one or several. >> - NS is a record to help non-authoritative name servers to find a valid >> name server for the zone they receive a request and they don't know >> anything about that

I'm testing to a seamless upgrade from 4.3.11 to 4.8.3 on my test setup. Database migrating from 4.3.11 was successful. After "samba-tool dbdcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes", 4.8.3 was launching ok except replication (4.3.11 to 4.8.3 : WERR_BADFILE). After demoting older ones and seize (transfer doesn't work) all roles to 4.8.3, dns (bind_dlz) service won't start anymore

2016-04-05 15:46 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl>: > Ok Mathias.. > > I hoop this helps a bit. > https://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/library/cc816941(v=ws.10).aspx > > now type : > nslookup -type=soa internal.domain.tld > or > nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld > and look at > nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld

No one knows about this?! It''s normal for domU in Xen-3.3 to have only 16KB of CPU cache size? Thanks! Thiagi 2008/9/18 Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com> > Hi folks! > > After upgrading my Xen-3.2.0 to new Xen-3.3.0/Linux-2.6.18.8-xen-3.3.0 my > domU /proc/cpuinfo shows only: > > administrativo@vsrvXX:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo >

Hi, These days I run into something quite odd. I have an A@H that was modified to meet our requirements. We have a completely funtional DISA which we use pretty much all the time. I works flawlessly with incomming SIP calls from several providers, IAX calls from FWD and with ZAP. Recently we came out with a situation where it doesn't work... with a

I have a Vdex-40 for sale http://www.twacomm.com/catalog/model_VDEX-40.htm It's 'used' in that I set it up on my test bed etc for about a month while I was consulting to them last year and it's been sitting on the shelf ever since. Great little unit 4 port FXO with dual cpu's. Tech Specs <http://www.technoco.biz/vdex-specs.php> Functionality

On 05/04/16 09:33, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>>: > > On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > > SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". > > > No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and

>> There is no link between SOA and NS except they share the zone.... Really... ? i dont agree.. SOA specifies the DNS server providing authoritative information about a domain, so looks to me its direcly related to NameServers. SOA contains the primary (NS) server of the domain. Looks to me its related... Below it nice explained how DNS works. That a SOA not (always) related is

SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". Using Bind-DLZ all DNS servers can modify the AD zones, they all reply "I am the SOA" when you ask them about SOA for AD zones. Using Internal DNS I expect all DNS servers can modify the AD zones also (that's internal stuff) but even if they can modify the AD zone locally that's is not the process chosen by Samba