similar to: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"

I agree. I haven't had a problem using CAT-5, even for long runs, however it's not a real T-Carrier cable and I didn't know how old the PBX is. Paul >I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality >Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you >should be fine. As far as the shielding goes, I use UTP cables and >Connectors

I have used cross-connect wire from the spool to make T1 crossover cables with RJ45 ends. All that matters is that pin one goes to four and two goes to five on both ends. ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Andrew Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1

I for one think it is a great idea to buy a book with hard earned money and wait a few days to a week just to get an answer to a question that is freely available on the internet immediately. Hard pressed to think of anything in the "book" that is not on with wiki with more up to date and useful information. -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Lopez

I tend to use the soft sell. Looks like I Just self-promoted :-) -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Novack Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 12:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users]

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:14 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users] > whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to

My telco used cat5 as well for the demarc to CPE. It's also with noting that many channel banks, such as my Atlas, and zapata.conf itself also have parameters to allow you to tune the gains to compensate for cable signal loss. I've never had to touch them, and my CPE is about 300 feet from the PRI demarc (with an ordinary Cat5 cable connecting them)

I was once told by a lineman that the cables they use didn't have that many twists in them because it wasn't needed, and that the extra twists would effectively use more cable and thus cost and weigh more than triple what they do now. He told me that with the number of twists in the Cat 5 cable it would cancel out any interference, but he also stated that the effective length was

At Sangoma we do quite a lot of back-to back T1 and E1 connections. T1 is not a very fussy connection, as the baud rate is only about 750 kbps. In our experience, for error free communications you can use the following rules of thumb: Up to 50 ft: Flat patch cable Up to 500 ft: Ordinary twisted telephone cable Cat 5 may be overkill unless you are going hundreds of feet. David Yat Sin

Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs. A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows: 1 - 4 2 - 5 3 - NU 4 - 1 5 - 2 6 - NU 7 - NU 8 - NU NU = Not Used I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you should be fine. As far as the shielding

Have you thought about making them agents, they would both be reachable by dialing there agent number then, and I know only one agent can be logged in at once. Just a thought. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 8:26 PM To:

>> >>Good thing he doesn't work for a cable manufacturer as that's >>a total crock of crap that even an inexperienced person >>should be able to detect. (You can't twist two wires to make >>them weight three times as much, or cost three times as much.) He may have started out as an underground lineman, posibly inhaling too much swamp gas and CO from

> I've never bothered to check to see if cat5 cables use the appropriate > mating twisted pairs or not. Since the pinouts are different for cat5 vs > T1 cables, I'd have to guess a single strand is used from two different > twisted pair groups. That wouldn't be cool, but in short runs it > probably doesn't have much of an impact. > IIRC, standard Ethernet uses

I'm getting Number but when I look at the CDR database. I do see the name -----Original Message----- From: Lacy Moore - Aspendora [mailto:aspendora@gmail.com] Sent: Mon May 01 17:10:26 2006 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Spam? Re: [Asterisk-Users] CallerID Name problem Do you get caller ID number? If so, WAITing is not going to help, since you

> Close. 10/100mbps Ethernet uses wires 1,2,3,6 but that is pair 2 & 3. > Pair > one is the pair up the dead center (pins 4&5), pair 2 is pins 1&2, pair 3 > is > 3&6 and pair 4 is 7&8. A T1 uses pairs 1&2, which is why you can't use a > regular crossover cable for a T1 crossover, but you can use a regular > ethernet patch cable as a T1 patch

> Unless you're going for some kind of distance record, standard Cat5 will > work > without any issue on any modern installation. As I said, I'm pretty sure > (not 100%, but close) that the T1 specification is only Cat3, since it's > standard BellCore wire and they don't run your T1 loops (which aren't T1 > anymore, they're DS1 over HDSL or HDSL2) in

> Ever looked at the underground cable in the street outside your > building? If it's more than 20 years old, it's probably paper-insulated > gel-filled cable, with an _extremely_ thin amount of insulation between > the conductors and _zero_ insulation between the pairs. T1s seem to work > just fine on it, unless it's very old or they try to put more than 6-8 > spans

Is there any technical difference between a T1 cable and a cat5e patch cable as far as using them with Digium T1/E1 cards? Can PRI circuits terminating at a smart jack connect successfully to Digium cards using straight through CAT5e cables? If so, are they using all of the pins in the cable? Thanks in advance

I'm connecting a T1 PCI card to a Nortel Option 61 switch T1 card. My Sangoma A102D shipped with 2 T1 cables - which I assume are straight through. Do I need to make crossover cables for this scenario? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071026/9cea5e74/attachment.htm

Hi, Digium's E400P has RJ45 conector and my E1 link has BNC concetor. Could someone tell me the cable pinouts to make this conection? thanks Eduardo

Before I go nuts trying to figure this out, is anyone using DISA in this manner? exten => s,1,DISA(XXXXX|context|callerid) Everything works except the caller ID part. What I had wanted to do is to setup up a file of authorization codes where each code was associated with a context and caller id. The format for the file, I thought would be: XXXX|context|callerid and I had it set up in