Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "sip.conf codecs: ulaw, alaw and g729"
2020 May 14
0
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
> From: "John Hughes" <john at calva.com>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List, Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:10:45 AM
> Subject: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and
> alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
> I am having a
2020 May 14
0
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote:
>
> I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729
> or alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw
> right? In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I
> get the dreaded "channel.c:5630 set_format: Unable to find a codec
> translation path: (g729) -> (alaw)"
2020 May 14
1
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:31 AM John Hughes <john at calva.com> wrote:
> On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote:
>
> I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or
> alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw right?
> In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get the
> dreaded "channel.c:5630
2020 May 14
0
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
The other end is sending g729 even though it was not negotiated. The other
end should not do this and it usually seems that the other ends that do
send g729.
This was recently fixed. See
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28139
Richard
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:11 AM John Hughes <john at calva.com> wrote:
> I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using
2020 May 14
6
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or
alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw
right? In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get
the dreaded "channel.c:5630 set_format: Unable to find a codec
translation path: (g729) -> (alaw)" and the call hangs up. Why?
Last minute thought: Is it possible that
2015 Jul 15
2
Problem "no voice"
Hi list!
I have 4 numbers on my Asterisk 1.8.
3 work perfectly, the 4.th not.
I'm not sure, when it finish to work, since a month ago it runs without any
problem...
Well, if I will be called on this number I can't hear anything and in
Asterisk I see these:
[Jul 15 18:59:55] WARNING[8752]: channel.c:5060 ast_write: Codec mismatch on channel SIP/00493514977290-000001d1 setting write format
2010 Nov 19
0
help with annoying warning message: Asked to transmit frame type ulaw, while native formats is 0x2 (gsm) read/write = 0x2 (gsm)/0x2 (gsm)
Hi all,
i have a little problem to understand this warning message, it's annoying
and it cause a lot of spurious in the log files.
Im working with this scenario:
a sip outgoing trunk (Trunk-out) that support only ulaw and all calls are
always routed to this.
a list of sip UAs that potentially can use any codec apart g729/g723.
I setup the asterisk to do as mediaproxy so directmedia=no and
2005 Mar 20
1
I cannot use G711 (ulaw|alaw)
Dear all,
I'm trying to use ulaw and alaw with Diax and Asterisk but I'm not able to,
I got the following error message:
Mar 20 11:47:59 NOTICE[7099]: chan_iax2.c:6350 socket_read: Rejected connect
attempt from 192.168.0.55, requested/capability 0x8/0xc incompatible with
our capability 0xfe02.
I do not understand why because my Asterisk box load these codecs properly!
Does somebody
2009 Sep 09
1
CLI file convert from alaw to g729 with TC400B transcoding card results to an empty file
Good afternoon,
I'm trying to use the CLI command file convert on an Asterisk 1.4.26 server with a TC400B transcoding card.
The transcoding card is working well for calls but I have some trouble converting sound files from alaw to g729. The command creates empty
file as you can see below...
CLI> file convert /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/fr/service_notactivated.alaw
2010 Jul 05
1
Problems with ulaw/g729 translation
Dear Folks,
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.31 server, on an Ubuntu 9.10 system. My scenario is
simple: connection to the PSTN directly via SIP, using g729 codec, and
connection to the softphones (X-lite 3.0 build 56125) trought local network,
using ulaw codec.
Sometimes, I got messages like:
[Jul 1 15:26:16] WARNING[26483]: chan_sip.c:5514 process_sdp: Unsupported
SDP media type in offer: image
2005 Jun 08
2
format g729 and Voxee.com
Hi,
I have just signed up with Voxee.com and have attached my Asterisk
server to dial them via IAX2.
Below is the start of the log which dials the number and promply
hangs up when the call is answered, with the logs saying that the
channel is not compatiable.
I have traced this down to the g.729 codec which I don't have
installed. Any ideas on how to force that the codec not be used?
2006 Mar 14
1
Codec Issue
Hi,
I have an issue which is kind of a catch 22 situation. I had outgoing calls
to my new PSTN provider working perfectly. Then I started focussing on
incoming calls. It seems that I can solve an error which gets my incoming
calls working but that in turns means my outgoing calls don't work. -
Strange
Anyhow I was getting an error:
Process_sdp: No compatible codecs!
And from the SIP
2005 Jul 13
1
Suddenly a problem with outgoing calls made from Cisco phones...
Hi all!
Quite a mystery. The following happened when I was on holiday, and no one else has changed any configs of either Asterisk or the Cisco's in the building...
The situation: Incoming works fine on all phones. Outgoing only works from non-Cisco phones. When calling from a Cisco phone to an external phone, all the Cisco-user hears is a ticking crackle and
after about a minute the phone
2004 Dec 21
1
G729, x-pro, and codec ordering
-----Original Message-----
I'm crazy here trying to make X-Pro use ONLY g729, and you're struggling
to make it not to use it :)...
Can you please indicate what's your config for X-Pro and sip.conf?
sip.conf:
[12345]
type=user
username=12345
secret=12345
nat=no
host=dynamic
reinvite=no
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=g729a
allow=g723.1
allow=g726
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
2011 Mar 09
3
Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4 (ulaw)/0x8 (alaw)
Hello!
Client is using ulaw, however server sometimes fills the log with following:
[2011-03-09 21:23:07] WARNING[27204] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit
frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4
(ulaw)/0x8 (alaw)
[2011-03-09 21:23:07] WARNING[27204] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit
frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4
(ulaw)/0x8 (alaw)
2004 Sep 26
2
Asterisk <-> WellGate 3502a : ulaw/alaw only?
Greetings,
I'm running latest * from CVS on FreeBSD 4.10 box. We've just bought
several WellGate 3502A FXSes to play with till welltech guys fix the
3504a's registration bug.
So far everything is working as expected, except the fact only ulaw and
alaw codecs work with *. If I add allow=gsm or allow=g723.1 in FXS's
ports entries in the sip.conf, no voice is heard from both
2006 Jan 23
1
Installing the none commercial intel g729 codecs into Asterisk@Home 2.2?
Yep I did the same.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Francesco Peeters (Asterisk)
Sent: Saturday, 21 January 2006 5:34 PM
To: fbraeuer@gmail.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
2008 Nov 11
3
Use the NEW ulaw/alaw codecs (slower, but cleaner)
In Asterisk 1.6, there is an option to use the 'new g.711 algorithm'.
"Use the NEW ulaw/alaw codec's (slower, but cleaner)"
By slower does this mean more 'expensive', or does it instead mean that there will be more algorithmic latency? Both? Can anyone speak to the relative increases?
With regard to accuracy, can anyone speak to what kind of situation might
2008 Jul 07
2
Codec negotiation for Thomson ST2030 and g729
Hi all,
i'm trouble with codec setup on an asterisk machine 1.4.18 and some
Thomson ST2030 as extensions.
In the users.conf file for internal extension i have:
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
Without any codec installed (i mean with original g729 of asterisk)
all go fine, calling from an extension to one other:
Peer User/ANR Call ID Seq (Tx/Rx) Format
2010 Aug 02
6
Codec negotiation : expecting G726, getting G711a (alaw)
Hello list,
Grandstream GXP2010 phone calling to Snom 320, Asterisk in the middle.
Grandstream allows for 8 different codec specifications. I have defined
them as 4 x G726 & 4 x alaw.
Snom allow for 7 different codec specifications. I have defined them as
3 x G726 & 4 x G729.
The SIP peers are both defined as :
disallow=all
allow=g726
allow=alaw
allow=g729
allow=gsm
This is the