similar to: Asterisk hyperthreading compiling.

Hello, I read an interesting article on 2cpu.com that talks about the performance differences between a P4 processor with Hyperthreading(HT) enabled and disabled. http://www.2cpu.com/articles/ht_explored/index.html The bottom line of the article is that processor intensive applications greatly benefit from HT being enabled, but memory intensive applications can actually see a slight decrease in

Except that mixmonitor still has a bug in it. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:45 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] call center running Asterisk -sound quality-critical! Matt Roth

Hi all, We have Xeon-based system with only 1 (hyperthreaded) CPU (in a HP DL360). We are seeing high load on multiple meetme session as well as g729 transcoding. My question is will putting an extra CPU help or does Asterisk just run on a single CPU. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

My Dell 2800 Dual 64bit Proc. machine came in with hyperthreading enabled. (they call it virtual processor??) I have been intending for a month to disable it. Tonight, I rebooted, turned it off, and let the system come up. zaptel loaded and asterisk loaded, but both of my t1s were red. (it is a TE411P) /proc/interrupts looked OK, zttest gave OK numbers. I doublechecked all of the files in case

Are they any issues still with hyperthreading processors, I've read and been told by a few people to make sure its disabled in bios if I want to use * on a hyperthreading machine. Kind Regards, Chris Bond

I just tried to install CentOS (x86_64 4.4 and i386 4.3, not both at once, when I found the 64bit version didn't boot, I tried the 32bit version, same result) on a dual Naconda Xeon system. I get an OOPS just after the IDE info is printed on the screen during boot (this is booting off the CD during the install phase). After mucking about with the bios settings (and many reboots later), I

Hi, my video sharing website (politube.org) that I developed with rails, runs on lighttpd/fcgi (I know it is obsolete by now) and is severely under load and regularly blocks because the lighttpd process chews up 50% of RAM (1GB). So now I want to move the system to a new server with 8GB, 64bit , Quad core processor (intel i7 920) but I am not sure if hyperthreading will really do anything better.

I've to setup Asterisk on a Dell PowerEdge 1750 server. Its dual Xeon 3GHz with Hyperthreading. People on this list who have experience with this server please advise me how is the performance of Asterisk on this server, what flavour of linux is good on it etc. Is Hyperthreading going to be a problem or not. I once read somewhere that hyperthreading caused some voice quality problems in

That's the problem we had with Asterisk and HT on a 2.4 Kernel: whenever Asterisk was staying in the RTP stream, and HT was enabled (on a Dell Dual Xeon system), we had choppy audio. After disabling HT, everything was fine again. Nothing measurable, indeed, but you could definitely hear it. So there *must* be something. -Manuel -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Peter Corlett

Hi, I have been trying to get Hyperthreading to work in a Windows HVM on Xen 4.1.2 as described in ''xmexample.hvm''. I think I have set it up correctly, but I can''t seem to get it to work. There is not much documentation on it and most topics are from years ago. I''m curious to know to whether this functionality is still supposed to work. I''m aware that

Hi, I can''t get rid of an annoying domU machines hanging issue with Hyperthreading enabled in my BIOS. Hardware config: IBM x325 series 2 * CPUs Intel Xeon 3.06 Ghz Xen version: 3.0.0 Kernel version: 2.6.12.6 Linux distrib: Debian Sarge 3.1 r1 I run 1 domU machine on my dom0, here is my Xen config: . xen0: /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp : (dom0-num-cpus 0) .

>but if I disable hyperthreading (noht on the kernel line in lilo/grub) Could the same result could be obtained if hyperthreading is disabled from the BIOS ? Supermicro Motherboards (most Phoneix based) have this option Also, would we see same pops and clicks in a dual CPU box (Zeon) then ? SW Message: 1 Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 14:32:16 -0500 From: Jeremy McNamara <jj@nufone.net> To:

Hi all, Is there a way to connect two live calls through the manager api without directing them to a meeting room? Currently, I can connect them by sending them to a meeting room. However, I don't know what the overhead is, and I kind of think that if I can connect them or link them up, the overhead would be minimum. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Just gave 3.0 a spin. Had been running 2.0.7 for the past 3 months or so without problems (aside from intermittent failure during live migration). Anyway, 3.0 seems to have an issue with my machine. It starts up the 4 domains that I''ve got defined (was running 6 user domains with 2.0.7, but two of those were running 2.4 kernels which I can''t seem to build with Xen 3.0 yet, and

My TE411p does not seem to like to have two PRIs from different telcos (span 1 and span 2). I can get one working, but not the other. However, if I use vpmsupport=0 when loading the wct4xxp module, they both work. But here is the problem, vpmsupport=0 disables the on board echo cancellation. Any ideas? BTW, here is zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs span=2,2,0,esf,b8zs bchan=1-23 dchan=24

Hi, All: Does the guest OS need to detect hyperthreading? One would think that the hypervisor decides what to schedule on what CPU, and the job of the guest is not to be too smart for its own good. So, my first reaction was to comment detect_ht() altogether. Fedora Core 5 has the code in detect_ht(), though I have no idea what the results of this are on HT CPUs, if they match the reality.

Anyone tried the digium TC400B transcoding card? What are your opinions? Thnx

Hi all, I am handed a project to setup *. The requirement is that it can handle 8 T1s. Half of the calls coming into the system will be routed to SIP extensions (with transcoding). The machine we have in our disposal is a new dual Xeon 3.2gHz server with 2g of ram and an dual 1000mb nic. Voice will be coming in from the PSTN (through 2 quad digium cards) in g711ulaw, and most of the time will

You got to be kidding about 53 calls being recorded at sametime is an issue. I have done at least twice as many on my dual xeon 3.4Ghz system and had no problem as clients like to record every call that goes through the system. Then again, in my system, the in and out channels are mixed first before they are written to the disk. ________________________________ From:

Asterisk People, I'm currently using Asterisk and with a SIP voip provider and I'm having problems where DTMF input in my IVR app is getting corrupted intermittently. For example, if someone enters 1025, it may come though correctly as 1025, or it may come trough as 10025, or 100255. DTMF digits will just double up. This doesn't happen all the time. Asterisk will just pick times