similar to: update - 512 Simultaneous Calls with Digital Recording

List users, Over the last few days we have been working with MCI's development lab to test our Asterisk setup. We were using a piece of hardware called an Abacus 5000 that is capable of creating and terminating thousands of SIP calls. Initially, we could not get past 64 simultaneous digitally recorded calls without having call quality issues including dropped calls. We identified an

On 6/22/17 7:50 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:42:40PM -0700, Erik Pilkington via llvm-dev wrote: >> I've been working on fixing this by parsing first into an AST structure, and >> then traversing that AST to produce a demangled string. This provides a >> significant performance improvement and also make the demangler somewhat

This is a little success story about the benefits of changing the defaults in config.site when I was building R-1.4.0 for Solaris (on a Sun Sparc that I'm currently using). For previous versions of R, I had just used the default config.site and not given it any thought. Since the Sun machine that I'm using is not getting any faster, I decided I would give config.site a look when building

> Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using tmpfs as opposed to the > following method: Matt, Its simple. To quote the docs, "tmpfs lives entirely in the kernel's caches" It will shrink and grow to accommodate the files that currently on the filesystem. So if you allocate 10GB for your /tmp but only use 500MB it will only use 500MB of RAM. Think of the time your server

The simplest solution and the one already implemented in linux, tmpfs. It would be best to allocate 4-8GB to tmpfs on /tmp and let the kernel do the work it was designed to do. And you would not be limited to PCI bus speeds. The DDR2800 is about 12GB/sec. Some would say "overheads, etc, etc". Agreed, even at 95% loss (doubtful) you still get higher badwitch then PCI bus/hard rive could

How can I activate Intel Virtualization Technology on an Intel Entry Server Board SE7230NH1-E with Pentium D 950 CPU? I have the lastest BIOS patch (1179) but there is no option to activate Virtualization Technology. I searched all over the Internet but it''s imposible to obtain a clear information if this combination of SE7230NH1-E motherboard + Intel E7230 server chipset + BIOS +

Hi everyone. Some body knows why my instalation always says Could Not mount root device (0,0), then reboots, i try to compile my own dom0 kernel, but always says the same thing. I''m seeking on create the initrd image, but nothings works. :( The currently hardware profile is this. Intel Server Board SE7230NH1-E (VT Enabled Motherboard) Intel Pentium D 830 CPU (3Ghz x 2 CPU) 2 GB

Another day, another apparant unexplained hardware incompatibility. I have a TE412P and a TDM400B living quite happily in a whitebox using an Intel motherboard: http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/se7230nh1-e/index.htm I tried to move to an IBM x3650 system. It uses a slightly newer chipset, but apparantly it's in the same family. The SE-7230 board has been EOL'd and the

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: >I wasn't talking about bandwidth but rather lengthy >Dial() commands... > >exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/someuser&SIP/someuser&SIP ...... > >kind of thing... seems awfully unwieldy. That's why you would stick the members into a global variable [globals] DIYCALLGROUP => SIP/111&SIP/112&SIP113 etc. then dial using

hi list, i try since weeks to authenticate my linux-clients against my samba-server. This works very fine with 2 windoze-cliens. but i still cannot authenticate with my linux-clients. i am @office now, thats wy i ask instead to test: i heard, winbind is used to authenticate linux-clients against the samba-server. the wbinfo -u gives me back: DOMAIN-user (i use the minus as separator) so i

If you have a rjs template with 10 lines of code. Is it possible to make then run in order, one after the other. Is this possible with rjs or are you stuck with the simultaneous execution of the javascript. I don''t want to resort to the delay method. Charlie bowman recentrambles.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Run this as one process: #!/bin/sh while [ 1 = 1 ]; do iptables -t mangle -F chain1 iptables -t mangle -X chain1 iptables -t mangle -N chain1 || exit 1 done Run this as another process: #!/bin/sh while [ 1 = 1 ]; do iptables -t mangle -F chain2 iptables -t mangle -X chain2 iptables -t mangle -N chain2 || exit 1 done and you get: iptables: No chain/target/match by that

I have a share that has been exported via NFS as well as shared using Samba 3.0. On the Windows side, all authentication is currently done using Winbind and Active Directory. On the standalone Samba server (also authenticated using Windbind) where the exported NFS resides, I have the same local Unix user (identified by the same name and UID/GID) that I have on each Unix (Mac/Linux) host that

Hello, is there anyone who has some ideas about the problem I posted? Help! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, My Gigaset S450ip allows 2 simulatneous calls when each incoming call are targeted to different phones. When both calls target the same extension, the second one is forwarded to voicemail. I couldn't check yet SIP messages but has anyone met this limitation (one simultaneous call per phone) ? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello all, I would like to ask a short question about the configuration capabilities of sshd / sftp-server. I want to limit the number of connections (or instances) to an sftp-server a user can spawn from the same ip address. The reason is that multiple connections overload by box (connection). My first idea was to move control of sftp-server to xinetd. There I could maintain control of such

> I have seen the following effect in Asterisk, though: where > it converts > an inband DTMF (eg coming off a Zap channel) into an > indication, it mutes > the audio where that tone is. But sometimes it leaves a > teeny bit of the > tone behind. > > If you take such a call over say IAX to somewhere and then > back out a Zap > channel, you end up with the

Did not get a response so I am reposting. I have a share that has been exported via NFS as well as shared using Samba 3.0. On the Windows side, all authentication is currently done using Winbind and Active Directory. On the standalone Samba server (also authenticated using Windbind) where the exported NFS resides, I have the same local Unix user (identified by the same name and UID/GID) that

Does anyone have any experience with a high number of *simultaneous* connections? We're investigating the possibility of moving one of our servers from novell to solaris, and the only "concern" we have at this time is what happens if 800 clients all decide to connect at the same time? the server will be running solaris/7 on a dual-ppro system ... I konw with the 'idle'

List, Would someone be so kind as to point me to a function that will calculate simultaneous confidence intervals of regression coefficients based upon their distribution as (under the assumption of normal errors, with \mathbf{X} as the design matrix): $\hat{\mathbf{\beta}} \sim N(\mathbf{\beta}, \sigma^2(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X})^{-1})$. 'confint' calculates individual coefficients so