similar to: DID's Now Offering Romania Bucharest 4021+ and 4031+

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5702 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060412/6e31a115/attachment.jpeg

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5702 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060528/4b320d1d/attachment.jpeg

hi Guys, We are live streaming the Dojo sessions today ( thanks to hostway for getting this up ). The live streams will be at http://www.centos.org/media.html once the sessinos start. The scheduled kick off is 10am localtime ( UTC +3 ) - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

hey all, I'm trying to double forward a DID , from PSTN to SIP DID then to my *. Double forwarding my DID , but the Digits are not getting relayed correctly ... sending double digits and sometimes missing digits? Is here anywhere I can put a delay on DTMF? Or a different solution for this? I use asterisk 1.2.1 , centos 4.2 , codec ulaw Let me know oliver@wvg-tele.com Oliver World

Hello Everyone, The timezone is set correctly on the OS America/Toronto: mv /etc/localtime /etc/localtime.bak cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Toronto /etc/localtime I even tried adding the timezone setting to sip.conf: timezone=America/Toronto However. Asterisk wants to be in Bucharest? Thinking about it, I want to be in Bucharest! Cheers, Nick.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5702 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060608/e786d4d3/attachment.jpeg

Hello everyone. My land-line provider (Romtelecom) has a very nice offer for ISDN. All in all they offer me a digital land-line with 1 base number + 2 MSN's and that would make a grate addition to my full-time home office. Romtelecom say they're providing EURO-ISDN and the line is compatible with any euro-isdn compliant equipment. They say they'll install a NT at my office and this

OOPS <blush> http://vcalinus.gemenii.ro/quaggarealms.html is what should have been posted by me... This deals with the metropolitan / other issues, I think. I can''t read it... -- gypsy

Hi, My name is Monenci Nicolae. I'm from Romania, an i have a problem that i could not find any answer on net. I have an "Samba version 3.013" instaled. I have atach-ed the smb.conf that i have configured my self. So my problem is: I have a network of 10 PC. (5 windows XP, 2 windows 2000, 3 windows NT) I have installed 1 new PC with windows XP. After i installed

Using => and <= instead of -> and <- would make things easier, although the precedence would be different. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:43 AM Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your replies, this actually has little to do with the > regular R code but more to signal what in my package QCA is referred

I have a simple function such as: foo <- function(x) { call <- lapply(match.call(), deparse) testit <- capture.output(tryCatch(eval(x), error = function(e) e)) if (grepl("Error", testit)) { return(call$x) } } and I would like to detect a formula when x is not an object: # this works > foo(A + B) [1] "A + B" # but this doesn't >

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > > It never gets to evaluating it. It is not a legal R statement, so the parser signals an error. > If you want to pass arbitrary strings to a function, you need to put them in quotes. I see. I thought it was parsed inside the function, but if it's parsed before then quoting is the

I suppose it would work, although "=>" is rather a descriptive symbol and less a function. But choosing between quoting: "A + B => C" and a regular function: A + B %=>% C probably quoting is the most straightforward, as the result of the foo() function has to be a string anyways (which is parsed by other functions). On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Richard M.

You are right. >= is not as evocative as =>. Perhaps > and < would do? %=>% and %<=% would work. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:41 AM Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Bill, > > I already tried this, and it would have been great as (currently) the > sufficiency relation is precisely

Adrian, Indeed, this has come up in a few places, but as Gabor says, there is no such thing as right hand assignment at any point after parsing is complete. This means the only feasible way to detect it, which a few projects do I believe, is process the code while it is still raw text, before it goes into the parser, and have clever enough regular expressions. The next question, then, is why

Would making it regular function %=>%, using "%" instead of quotes, work for you? On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > wrote: >> [...] >> >> It never gets to evaluating it. It is not a legal R statement, so the > parser

I searched and tried for hours, to no avail although it looks simple. (function(x) substitute(x))(A <- B) #A <- B (function(x) substitute(x))(A -> B) # B <- A In the first example, A occurs on the LHS, but in the second example A is somehow evaluated as if it occured on the RHS, despite my understanding that substitute() returns the unevaluated parse tree. Is there any way, or is

Dear Bill, I already tried this, and it would have been great as (currently) the sufficiency relation is precisely "=>"... but: foo <- function(x) return(substitute(x)) foo(A => B) Error: unexpected '>' in "foo(A =>" It seems that "=>" is a syntactic error for the R parser, while "<=" is not because it denotes less than or

Hello, Is there a way to extract multiple columns from a dataframe using their names instead of their numbers? Currently I use: data2 <- data1[, c(1,3,9)] And I am looking for something like data2 <- data1[, c("XX","YY","ZZ")] I use the same dataframe for many purposes, and I run codes that change the order of the columns every time. Many thanks, Adrian

%=>% would have precendence ('order of operations') problems also. A + B %=>% C is equivalent to A + ( B %=>% C) and I don't think that is what you want. as.list(quote(A + B %=>% C)) shows the first branch in the parse tree. The following function, str.language, shows the entire parse tree, as in > str.language(quote(A + B %=>% C)) `quote(A + B %=>%