similar to: Redirect problem/bug/feature

Greetings to all, I ma having a problem with channel variables on a couple of our Asterisk boxes. Here is the setup. Asterisk on customer's site (1.2.5), using IAX to our external GW (1.2.5), IAX to PSTN GW (1.0.10), E1/PRI to PSTN. On the External GW, we also have an IAX trunk to a VOIP provider if for some reason the E1 is down. If the DIALSTATUS is CHANUNAVAIL, which should be

We recently deployed 10 SNOMs as part of a PBX hosted solution. We have one phone setup as the receptionist phone, using hints to show busy office lines. This all works as expected. This is a new installation, and people are just starting to setup their phones. For those of you not familiar with SNOM phones, there is a row of keys on the right side of the phone which SNOM calls function keys. In

Hi: i have a problem. Mi extensions.conf: exten => _N.,1,Setvar(VOICEMAILREQ=${EXTEN}) exten => _N.,2,SetAccount(${customer}) exten => _N.,3,SetCDRUserField(${VOICEMAILREQ:1}) exten => _N.,4,ResponseTimeout(5) exten => _N.,5,Background(ifyou) exten => _N.,6,Background(silence/1) exten => _N.,7,Background(ifyou) exten => _N.,8,Background(silence/5) exten

I'm trying to implement direct_media between multiple peers and an uplink provider, all of whom have direct_media=yes configures. For originating calls to the uplink provider direct_media=yes works like expected. SIP flows through asterisk, rtp doesn't SIP: enduser <-> SBC <-> asterisk 13 <-> uplink RTP: enduser <-> SBC <-----------------> uplink SBC

I''m trying to build a QoS system that would divide the outgoing traffic into four categories, each one also subdivided into two more categories. For that I chose a htb root qdisc subdivided into four classes, each of these classes contains also a htb qdisc. Until these point everything goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a problem with the sintaxis

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

Dear friends: I was analizing the HTB script at "The ultimate traffic conditioner", at the Cookbook, at Lartc. I have a very basic question: First, it is defined the root htb qdisc, as expected; then, it is defined the main (parent) htb class, with the total uplink as rate, also as expected; then, they are defined 2 child clases: first of them has also the total uplink as rate (!)

Hi I''m moving to hfcs (mostly succesfuly:) ), but I''ve encountered a strange problem: When I download something from this server using wget (one thread) via an idle uplink, I get no more than 130 kbit/s, and when I''m using prozilla (or start more wgets), I get about 200 kbit, but still it''s not all the link can do (240) - the rest remamins unused. Is this

Hi folks, I''m trying to shape two clients in my LAN when accessing the internet. Actual situation is that EVERY traffic goes into 1:40, so the client which should fall into 1:30 does not get the lower uplink it should have, but the uplink defined for the client defined as 1:30 When I disable the definition of 1:40, every traffic falls into 1:30 (except for the traffic defined to be in

Hello, I''m a total tc newbie, and I''m trying to tweak the wondershaper script (http://lartc.org/wondershaper/) to get a slightly different result. Excuse me if I will not use the correct technical terms, it''s a whole new world to me :) wondershaper.htb creates 3 HTB classes; 1:10 is high prio, 1:20 is bulk (default), and 1:30 is low priority. The classes are

Mar 15 12:54:01 NOTICE[24269] channel.c: Dropping incompatible voice frame on Local/[removed number]@context-5c3e,2 of format ulaw since our native format has changed to slin Can anyone provide an English translation of what this means? The extension is a Polycom IP 501 The only allowed formats are g.711u MOH is MP3 files (obvious) All prompts have been re-recorded in .ul uLaw

Several times a day I get this meesage scrolling on one of our asterisk boxes: Mar 13 14:43:47 NOTICE[11264]: channel.c:1911 ast_read: Dropping incompatible voice frame on Local/928@sanset-d88e,2 of format slin since our native format has changed to alaw Mar 13 14:43:47 NOTICE[11264]: channel.c:1911 ast_read: Dropping incompatible voice frame on Local/928@sanset-d88e,2 of format slin since our

hi all. here in Lebanon,Beriut we are allowed only to use satellite for downlink only. uplink is made through a router connected to public land lines. The satellite card is a penta card. i want to distribute Internet connection to customers. such a connection i want to do on linux. but what hinders me is the configuration which i dont know how to do. so please , some one tell me how to

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

Hello all, I am providing broadband service through DVB circuit. I have 4KB uplink and 32KB downlink. I want to share 32KB downlink bandwidth among 192.168.0.0/24 (20 users in this subnet i.e 192.168.0.2-192.168.0.22)subnet where each user will get 2KB to 6KB bandwidth. And from 4KB uplink bandwidth each users will get only 1KB to 2KB bandwidth.

First, I apologize if this message has been received multiple times. I''m having problems subscribing to this mailing list: Hi xen-users, I am trying to decide whether I should run a game server inside a Xen domain. My primary reason for wanting to virtualize is because I want to isolate this environment from the rest of my server. I really like the idea of isolating the game server

Greetings, My question deals with the htb version of wonder shaper. I used it for some time without much alteration except I noticed something odd in the way the rates are set up for the 3 htb classes. The way I understand it, there are 3 classes: 1:10 - high prio class with rate ${UPLINK}kbit 1:20 - bulk/default class with rate $[9*$UPLINK/10]kbit 1:30 - bulk/default low priority

For easy reading: http://www.karthaus.nl/r/ Hi, We used to have 1 single ip range (1.1.1.0/24) that had one uplink to a = switch of the colocation provider. Recently we got a second range 2.2.2.0/24 and a redundant uplink = directly on two routers. But our switch does not have spanning tree = protocol support so we cannot use them redundantly. We have set up the switch to have a vlan for both