similar to: Regcontext, only 1 context available?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Regcontext, only 1 context available?"

2006 Mar 13
0
Re: Regexten & Regcontext, working now
Just figured it out, I think. I put regcontext=mycontext into the [general] section in sip.conf instead of the the [user] section and when the sip user registered, the NoOp extension priority 1 came right up in the dial plan. All is well again, so far. Clarity of sight becomes infinitely greater with head removed from rectum. >> > Hi All, > > I've been trying to get
2006 Mar 13
0
Regexten & Regcontext
Hi All, I've been trying to get regexten and regcontext going for some sip peers but following the examples on the wiki is not working, as far as I can tell, nothing is happening. the phone registers, sip show peers is ok, but the NoOp priority 1 extension never gets created or added to the dialplan. Has anyone got this working? Thanks. JR JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses
2006 Dec 05
0
RE: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > JR Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:49 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] RE: regcontext,NoOp extension > vanishes when extension reload > > > > > Let me guess: The
2006 Dec 05
0
Re: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload, WORKING
OK this was an easy one to fix. All I had to do is RTFM. Note on the wiki: ATTENTION: Make sure you take a look at bug report 7144 Just do what Kevin said, include the regcontext in whatever static context you have the priority 2 extension and don't make a static regcontext in extension.conf. Let sip module do the rest. Works great. Thanks Guys. JR On 12/5/06, JR Richardson
2006 Dec 05
2
regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload and doesn't come back
Hi All, I just noticed something interesting. When a sip device registers and regcontext is setup in sip.conf, a NoOp priority 1 extension is dynamically created in the dialplan within the specified regcontext. Works great. If for some reason, modification is made to the extension.conf and a >reload extension is performed, those dynamically created extensions in the regcontext vanish. Now
2005 Oct 08
0
Regcontext/regexten broken??
Recently I've noticed two bits of odd behavior with respect to regcontext/regexten in CVS HEAD & 1.2 Beta1, and I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on this. I've set up a regcontext in sip.conf. I've set up two users with regexten entries, one in sip.conf and one in a mysql realtime table. The first bit of oddness is that regexten seems to work somewhat as described
2006 Jun 08
0
SV: Using regcontext
Hello Thanks for the answer... Just realized it myself, as your mail arrived :) Could be a nice feature though. Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Olle E Johansson Sendt: 8. juni 2006 12:09 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Emne: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using
2006 Jun 08
1
Using regcontext
Hello List Ive been trying to use regcontext, but I cant get it to work. Ive setup my sip peers to have the regexten _[0-9]., so that I can capture all registrations in a single extension. But when they register, I can see that the dynamic extension is created, but none of the rest of the code is executed, priority 2-4. Can anyone explain how I should use the regcontext parameter, etc. am I using
2006 Oct 06
3
regexten & regcontext broken for SIP?
Hi ho, is there anyone out here that is making use of the regcontext and regexten settings in sip.conf? I've tried this on two Asterisk boxes (1.2.10 and 1.2.12.1) and in both cases I don't see the Noop priority 1 being created upon SIP client registration, "show dialplan xxx" reveals no change. And yes, I have also read and checked bug 7144; if I go down that route and no
2009 Aug 07
1
regcontext regexten
Hi Anyone know how to use regcontext et regexten parameter from sip.conf and can give an example ? thx regards Harry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090807/ef9ba45e/attachment.htm
2008 Oct 29
0
What syntax to send user:pass in SIP Dial string?
Hi All, I'm trying to get the user:pass embedded in a SIP Dial string instead of calling a SIPuser in sip.conf: Regular way, exten => 1234,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@sipuser|30|) Where the 'sipuser' is a context on sip.conf [sipuser] fromuser=sipuser What I would like to do is embed the username:password in the Dial string, something like this: exten =>
2006 Mar 17
1
RE: DUNDi .... Halfway and CLUSTERING
At the moment I'm out of the office, but when I return I'll be certain to do that. Note that my solution is different from what you are working on with regexten, though I suspect some of the challenges that I've faced and overcome are not. I'm actually using UltraMonkey for load-balancing and failover of the Asterisk boxes, and my dialplan is set up so that it need not be changed
2007 Oct 06
1
DUNDi, regcontext, softphones.. fail.
> I'm having an issue deploying softphones into my DUNDi/regcontext > setup. My current design is that all SIP users get registered into a > sipregistration context in the sip.conf. I then have a dialplan > function that includes that and does the dial: > > include => sipregistration > exten => _XXXX,2,Answer() > exten => _XXXX,3,Wait(1) > exten =>
2006 Mar 17
1
Re: DUNDi .... Halfway and CLUSTERING
Do you mean the peristence of connecting a specific phone to a specific server? If so, then it's relatively easy. The ldirectord has a persistence setting that does that. If I'm misunderstanding you, then could you explain further what you mean? Regards, - Brad -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On
2006 Dec 05
0
RE: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload
> > Let me guess: The context in which you have the 2 thru n priorities is > the same one as you're using for regcontext right? > > Don't do that, bad things will happen (as you've noticed). > > I'd have to review the code again, but I think what you're seeing is as > a result of this. > > Regards, > - Brad > No, not exactly, I have a
2008 Oct 07
1
regcontext
hi all, just wondering what's happening here: i have a pap2 and an spa941. everytime i call my spa from my pap2 i can see it being added dynamically on the regcontext: [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Saved useragent "Linksys/SPA942-5.2.8" for peer 100100 [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Added extension '100100' priority 1 to sipregcontext but from spa to pap2 i dont see it, i looked
2006 Mar 13
7
Clustering "NEW THREAD", Almost Working
All, I made some progress, but it seems the further I go with clustering the harder things get. Hmmm, I guess if it were easy, it would be documented...... Anyhow, I have 1 * server as the DUNDi peering master with a ttl=1. The only function of this server is to lookup where other sip peers are registered and forward that info on to the requesting * server. I have 4 * servers accepting
2006 Mar 21
1
VoiceMailMain(@context) Problem with Option 5(Advanced)
I had the same problem yesterday. I thought it might have been a realtime problem. Guess not. Bloody annoying too. > -----Original Message----- > From: JR Richardson [mailto:jr.richardson@cox.net] > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:52 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] VoiceMailMain(@context) Problem with Option > 5(Advanced) > > > Hi
2011 Dec 16
2
Which device auto-registered an extension?
Hi all, In sip.conf: [general] regcontext = autoreg [devabc] regexten = 543 creates "exten=> 543,1,Noop(devabc)" in context autoreg when devabc registers. But I can't use "exten=> _5XX,2,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN})" in the dialplan, because there's no device SIP/543. Now I know I can add a line like "exten=> 543,2,Dial(SIP/devabc)" for each and
2006 Mar 21
2
VoiceMailMain(@context) Problem with Option 5 (Advanced)
Hi All, The situation: When I dial into VoiceMailMain(@context), put in my VM # 1001 and Password 1001, no problem, but at the voicemail main audio prompt (Alison), when I ?press 3 for advanced options? then ?press 5 to leave a message? I put in a mailbox number 1002 within the same [context], but VoiceMailMain looks for the mailbox in the [default] context and will not recognize the mailbox I?m