similar to: Authenticate CDR Logging

Does anyone have any idea why this will not redirect output to a file exten => s,2,System(/home/./supercallerid.pl ${CALLERIDNUM} ${CALLERIDNUM} ${CALLERIDNAME} > /home/supalogs/super_callerid_output.txt) I know the perl script works as it I get this in CLI> * Executing System("SIP/9169541949-c23c", "/home/./supercallerid.pl 9164003223 9164003223 Buffalo

On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: > On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: >> is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or >> 993 over 143? or? > There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about this. > The opinion againt 993/995 is that these are not standard ports, Out of curiosity, is there a

I have two vectors x and y, which I would like to plot against each other. I am also displaying other data in this plot. However, I have about 1 million points to plot, and just plotting them x againt y is not very informative. What I'd like to do is to do sort of a continuous box plot. My x values goes from -1 to 1 and my y values from 0 to 1, so I?d like to plot the median and quantiles,

On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > >> >> On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: >>> On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: >>>> is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or >>>> 993 over 143? or? >>> There is no concrete answer. There

Hi all! Question about idmap=ldap backend in domain with win2k PDC: Should I manually add all domain users to ldap and then retrieve the idmap from ldap, or in case of sucessfull authentication againt Win2k PDC, users are addedd automaticaly to ldap? Or I can use idmap ldap backend only in SAMBA LDAP PDC case? Thanks! Gints

Hi Bill, On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:52:03PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi Wei-Ren Chen, > > Thanks for the reports. Could you ask on the cfe-dev list if adding these flags to the tests are appropriate to fix the issues? > > -bw If I send patch for LLVM 3.1 rc1, what revision I should againt? The one (r154899) which rc1 branch from, or the current svn head? Regards, chenwj

Hy all, I wish to use the date function to draw againt the lifetime of a motor. This lifetime is given to me in Hours (it can go over 5000 hours) I'm unable to find how to convert this lifetime value to something like %H:%M:%S because when R see 24H it says 1 day, i don't want that, i just want %H:%M:%S with a value of %H higher than 24... for example: i've got this value in hours:

Every attempt to upgrade to current versions of samba or to get a second samba server to accept logins has failed. This is the second Samba server we are attempting to run, configured more or less with the same smb.conf as an operation samba server - runnind an older version. Specifics: Samba Version: samba-1.9.18p10 Platform: Sun OS 5.6 We are attempting to operate with clear_text password

Hello guys, recently I update my driver stack - Kernel up to 4.12.1 with additional flags for amd_si http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ - Drivers http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/drivers/ xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-22.20170607 Xorg level 1.19 compiled againt the 1.17 server. rebuilt intel-vaapi-driver-1.8.2-1, because I need it for steam (test suite)

Please reply to my email address as I can't get that uch email a day or my schools account starts dropping mail... Could someone please help, I have a Dec Alpha running Linux with Samba. I can log onto it with net use, but I just can't get the pain in the butt to appear on browse lists. I think the first problem is that nmbd is not looking up anything. When I do an nmblookup it

just setting a new Dovecot server to migrate from older system, but, I have a general question: 1. I've set the server with self issued cert, and both pop/imap StartTLS/110/143 SSL/993/995 (apologies if I'm using wrong naming terminology) is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or 993 over 143? or? my current understanding is that some (MS?)

Here i am doing a dial command from a php agi... EXEC DIAL H323/123456789@xx.xx.xx.xx:1720|40|HL(585000:61000:30000) But asterisk is not disconnecting the connection after 585 secs... the result is ... answered time is 1926n but thing is time out is working some time and some time not.... LOG: 2005-06-28 20:26:13 VERBOSE[19094] logger.c: callcard.php: string(111) "app_callingcard:

Update: > Clang :: CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp > > Seems to be difference between ARM and Intel C++ ABI, but I leave it to > James to comment. Use "-triple x86_64-none-linux-gnu" makes this test pass. Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)

Hi Wei-Ren Chen, Thanks for the reports. Could you ask on the cfe-dev list if adding these flags to the tests are appropriate to fix the issues? -bw On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:35 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > Update: > >> Clang :: CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-stdinitializerlist.cpp >> >> Seems to be difference between ARM and Intel C++

Hi, I have configured the MTA (exim4) to put the messages for my local users at /var/mail. If the user does not exist as true unix user, it looks at a postgresql database and if the user exists there, it delivers the message at /var/mail/virtual Example: User fred is a unix user, and peter is a virtual user. If i send a mail to fred at mydomain.org, the message is stored at /var/mail/fred (im

On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: > is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or > 993 over 143? or? There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about this. The opinion againt 993/995 is that these are not standard ports, and there is no need to allocate new ports for the secure version of each protocol since we

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > > On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: > > On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: > > > is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or > > > 993 over 143? or? > > There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about > > this. > > The

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote: > > > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > > > > > > > > On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: > > > > On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: > > > > > is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over

Hi, I'm trying to connect to a Samba Domain Member, but I always end up with the same strange error. The PDC (authenticating againt LDAP) and the server itself (Lobo) are Samba 3.0.2a-1 (Debian). I first tried to connect from my Windows client. It gave me the following error: "\\Lobo is not accessible. The specified network name is no longer available." When connecting via

Hi All! We have just solved the problem. The error resides in the code placed in /samba-X.X.X/source/lib/util_getent.c between line 275 and 291 . By default, when you compile samba with solaris support, samba uses "getgrnam" function because of the "BROKEN_GETRNAM=1" in Makefile. This function is what's making samba going wrong. The soluction was to undefine