similar to: Kernel for Pentium MMX

I've tried to install midnight commander on centos3.1 final. No luck in installing it via yum install. When I download src.rpm from centos2 updates SRPMS I couldn't rebuild it. RPM --rebuild mc*.src.rpm didn't work (no rebuild option). What can I do then ? Best Regards Cooba

Today I have changed my DSL modem and problems with postfix begun. It receives mail, but cannot send any. In logs I can read Jun 22 19:39:53 server postfix/smtp[5040]: 9A51711FF85: to=address at somedomain.com, relay=none, delay=12840, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=somedomain.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) My resolv.conf is proper. I can

yum was unable to find and install netatalk, so i used RH9 package. It successfully installed, but didn't started. Dmesg showed me that some module is missing. I pressume I will need to compile new kernel, right ? Best Regards Kuba

I am running Samba 3.0.9/KRB5 1.4 on Centos 3.4 on x86 with security = ADS in a Win2k3 domain. I have successfully used kinit to authenticate, joined the domain, and wbinfo -g/-u/-t return the expected results. However, when I try and access the samba shares from a Win2k3 box, it fails telling me I don't have permissions to access the share. Needless to say I am thoroughly perplexed. I have

Andreas Bogk mentions: [about the perl script that searches for the specific sequence:] > Do *not* rely on this program. The program could create the sequence > at runtime. Right. The sequence is not at all hard to hide from such a per script. Some people mentioned that there are now 4 known opcodes that stop a pentium. Some claim that "it stops the clock" because the temp of the

<URL:ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/testing/pre-patch-2.0.32-4.gz.maybe> ___ Trevor Johnson

these are both fixed in 2.0.32-pre4 and 2.1.63. The 2.0.32-pre4 stuff seems very solid, though the f00f bug fix is not proper for SMP machines yet. It looks like 2.0.32-pre5 fixes the f00f bug on SMP machines properly. All of these are available on ftp.kernel.org: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/testing/pre-patch-2.0.32-5.gz ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.1/linux-2.1.63.tgz

Is there a binary available for the Pentium 4? Kindest regards, Oliver. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be

Hi Does anybody have some experience with running XEN 3.x on Pentium D 805/820/830/840 (Dual core)? I would like to purchase Intel 7230 based motherboard with Pentium D 830 and plenty of memory but I´m not sure if it will works with XEN. Example of motherboard: http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/server/svr/pro_svr_detail.php?UID=618 In hardware compatibility list on xensource is nothing

I''ve ran into a bunch of threads and postings that seem to be outdated or end up on a different topic. I can''t seemto find one that will actually help. What I need is to simply re-compile Xen (and maybe the kernel) for a Pentium M computer that does NOT support PAE. If I install CentOS 5.1 (without XEN) on Pentium M machine. What do I have to do next to recompile and turn off

Dear R people, I have been trying to use install.package() to install packages from CRAN. The machine is a Windows 2000 with Pentium 4. The machine operates under a proxy environment. I have followed advices I found on R-help mailing list: change internet2.dll to internet.dll so that R will use the same setting as Internet Explorer uses. After I made the change, R crashes when I attempt to use

Hi all, i'm going to install asterisk with a 4 BRI (HFC chipset) on a Celeron at 2.6 GHz I don't known Celeron performance, but i listen that is not very good. Could I have some performance isuue with this kind of processor ? Thanks for all Giordano -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello: I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5015P-TR. It has a Pentium D and is running CentOS x86_64. Can this machine use 8GB RAM? I think it should because it is running a 64 bit OS, but I am concerned because it is fundamentally 32 bit hardware. Anyone have any experience in this area? Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com Eliminate junk email and reclaim your

On 8/31/18 9:29 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish to > be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in > it. > > Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it? I would use FreeBSD (and I do use FreeBSD for bacula, now bareos backup server and storage hosts), it has really

Gary Stainburn wrote: > I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I > wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / > processor in it. > > Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it? CentOS will work, but you might start with minimal (but make sure it includes networking). Please note that I installed CentOS 6, just

I?m fresh out of FreeBSD world. Depending on the port, it can be easy and predictable, or an absolute confusion-fest. > On Aug 31, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > > Thanks for this. I haven't looked at FreeBSD since the 1990's or there abouts, > but I'll give it a look. Cheers, Bee

On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, mark wrote: > CentOS will work, but you might start with minimal (but make sure it > includes networking). > > Please note that I installed CentOS 6, just a few months ago, on an HP > Netbook from '09, and it runs perfectly well. > > mark "see? I didn't say anything about systemd...." CentOS 6 requires a PAE supporting CPU.

Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I > wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / > processor in it. "Old Pentium" isn't very precise; the first Pentiums were in 1993! The least demanding distributions I know are Bodhi, https://www.bodhilinux.com/ ,

> Am 31.08.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk>: > > I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish to > be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in > it. We use mysql as database backend for bacula, and it becomes heavy loaded, over time especially wenn restoring respectively

On 31/08/18 16:47, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > Gary Stainburn <gary at ringways.co.uk> wrote: <snip> > "Old Pentium" isn't very precise; the first Pentiums were in 1993! They were the ones nicknamed "i586.01" see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug -- J Martin Rushton MBCS -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was