similar to: List Rules

The owner of my company just asked me for an Asterisk brochure. Has anyone seen such a creature? I know of some really informative websites, but I think a pdf would be priceless at this point. Thanks, Bob McDowell EMAIL PRIVELEGED & CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION    *** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION *** This e-mail message and all attachments, if any, may

I ran into a weird one last night. If I use 'service asterisk start' I have problems (see below). If I exclusively use 'asterisk -vvvvvvvvvvvvc' everything works normally. It happens like this: 1) 'service asterisk start' 2) Use asterisk normally, etc, etc - eventually change something that requires a restart 3) Issue either a CLI 'stop now' or a 'service

My Asterisk server believes that a Digium TE405P and sound are incompatible. Basically, no matter what else I do to the machine it terms of hardware, if the TE405P is installed, none of the playback/background/etc commands work. MOH works fine. So far, I have tried: 1) Seven different PCI soundcards with different chipsets. (Go go Computer Junk Store!) 2) Disabling each and every device

I think I'm very close to getting IAXModem and Hylafax going, but my current inbound hylafax logs show this: Feb 23 10:09:37.98: [ 3638]: MODEM <Empty line> Feb 23 10:09:37.98: [ 3638]: MODEM TIMEOUT: waiting for v.21 carrier Two questions - 1) Does anyone know what step I missed here? (I.e. please help!) 2) Is there a document I should be working off of? Google doesn't seem to

I realize that this isn't the biz list, so I'll make this short. If you have a good vendor of IP hardware that you'd recommend someone check out, please send me their info off-list. My e-mail is 'bmcdowell@federalprotection.com'. Any tips would be much appreciated. Thanks, Bob McDowell

I'd like to use native moh instead of with mpg123... for some reason the processes never bloody die. For native moh to not spawn an external player, I'd need to convert the default supplied moh sound files in /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3 to ulaw and g729 format. Anyone know of a free, easy way to convert them? Thanks, Doug.

I realize this is off-topic, but I need to post it. I had to go up to Connecticut on January the 12th quite unexpectedly because my great-grandmother Ethel, someone I was very close to, died that morning, at 93 years old. She was an incredible woman. I was asked to be one of the pallbearers. Her ultimate goal in life, and one she fulfilled every day, was to make people laugh. She truly

We''re excited to let you know that Timothy Mcdowell has invited you to Dropbox! Timothy Mcdowell has been using Dropbox to sync and share files online and across computers, and thought you might want it too. Visit http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.ftpgPVIkHP/NjY5MjU5ODU3 to get started. - The Dropbox Team ____________________________________________________ To stop receiving invites

Rsync only cares about the modification time. The ls command usually abbreviates the timestamp so it is better to use the stat command on one of the problem files to see the full thing. On 06/02/2016 06:42 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Cool Thanks! > > Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l" > but do not match for "ls

The man page has a section on what all the itemize-changes flags do. There is a --ignore-times but the result is what you have now, re-copy everything even if the timestamp matches. The best you can really do with storage that can't handle timestamps is to use --update. But if you do that you need to get rid of --partial (part of -P) or else rsync will never complete a file that was

On Mon, January 25, 2016 19:12, Benjamin Smith wrote: > > Which I'd consider "best practices" and we do them. > They are specifically asking about what to do *after* a > breach. Despite all the best practices in > place, there's *still* some risk. > If someone wants in to your network then they will get in. There is no point in deluding yourself or your

Again, --partial only means don't delete the incomplete file if rsync is aborted. Normally rsync will delete the incomplete file so you don't have bogus files laying around. When you rsync to or from a network mount to rsync that is a local copy. To use rsync over the network either your source or your target would be hostname:/path (for rsync over ssh) or hostname::module (for an

On Monday, January 25, 2016 11:56:19 AM Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Smith <lists at benjamindsmith.com> wrote: > > We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the > > event of unauthorized access. > > Tell them you use the Mr. Miyagi defense: ?Don?t get hit.? > > Your prospective client sounds like they?re

I have never seen rsync do that. What exactly are you doing? On 04/07/2017 03:07 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Thank you! > > I run --times when I use rsync (I actually use the -a flag) but the times do not transfer over and if I run rsync dryrun with -i I can see that it wants to transfer the files because of times. When I run rsync a second time with your suggestion the times do

It is saying the timestamp is wrong and that it is copying the file and changing the timestamp. If it does that every time then either the timestamps are changing on the source or the target isn't storing them. On 06/02/2016 06:13 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you > provide some insight? > > This is a local

Full_Name: Andrew Grant McDowell Version: R 1.1.1 (but source in 1.3.0 looks fishy as well) OS: Windows 2K Professional (Consumer) Submission from: (NULL) (194.222.243.209) In article <xeQ_6.1949$xd.353840@typhoon.snet.net>, johnt@tman.dnsalias.com writes >Can someone help? In R, I am generating a vector of 1000 samples from >Bin (1000, 0.25). I then do a Kolmogorov Smirnov test

If you are doing a local only copy (rsync isn't networking) then --whole-file is forced. There is no benefit of reading and checksumming files to reduce network transfer when there is no network transfer. You said you were moving data to a remote server so I assume you are using a network mount of some kind to make it a local copy instead of letting rsync do the networking. Anyways, if

the T means that the timestamp is wrong and rsync is not fixing it because you don't have --times or --archive in your command line. On 06/08/2016 08:17 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Yes, both file systems are the same. > > rsync -nri --modify-window=1 <src> <dest> > > Gives me the following for most files >f..T....... >

I''ve just finished upgrading both of my test hosts from XCP 1.0 to XCP 1.1, and the pool master is fine and happy. The second host, however, isn''t. To be perfectly clear, I didn''t ''upgrade'' that one, but had installed something else in the interim, so I did a fresh install of XCP 1.1. Anyway when attempting to get it to join the pool, I get an error

When my Asterisk box is called from my company's standard type of phone, it does not detect normal button presses on the keypad. You can use the phone's 'touch tones' feature to send data to the box, but that is a bit cumbersome. My Norstar voicemail system (that is being replaced) does not have this limitation. Is there anything I can do on the Asterisk side? Thanks, Bob