similar to: Moving from Fedora core 1 to CentOS

Can you upgrade RH9 to Centos, or do you have to do a complete install? Is there an iso with a .ks file on it to do a remote install?

I've downloaded the latest CVS as of yesterday. Zaptel and libpri compile and link OK but after issuing the "make asterisk" command I get the following: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lidn collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [app_curl.so] Error 1 make[1]: leaving directory '/usr/src/asterisk/apps' make: *** [subdirs] Error 1 Linux version is 2.6.9-1.667 gcc

Be curious myself as to what info you come up with on the "upgrade via ISO" and "SATA" support questions you posed. Hopefully someone on the list will help you out with a reply to the list. JT > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 19:47:15 -0800 (PST) > From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer at zanshin.com> > To: centos at caosity.org > Subject: [Centos] Upgrade

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings folks, I'm currently redoing my home server as one of the hard drives in my RAID-1 array went down and I'm going to replace the lot of it with a 3Ware Escalade 9500S RAID capable card and four Seagate 200GB SATA drives. These drives are supposedly the coolest and quietest SATA drives available (better than the Maxtors I had anyway)

Another quick question- In reading the "official" release notes for EL4, I ran across this- > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 support for SELinux uses Extended > Attributes on ext2/ext3 file systems. This means that, when a file is > written to a default-mounted ext2/ext3 file system, an extended > attribute will also be written. > > This will cause problems on systems

Hello all, I have a clerk connect box running at my library and it is based on RH9. I am having a little trouble with resolving URLs. I have two nics in it. eth0 with an Internet connection and and eth1 which is my inhouse LAN. Now I can ping IPs on the Lan, and On the net but I can not ping URL's (www.yahoo.com) now I do have an entry in resolv.conf nameserver xxx.xxx.xx.xxx and this

Dear sir; i am using redhat 9 on a production server and i plan to migrate to centos 3.1. the issue now is redhat 9 vulnerable to LHA package security vulnerabilities . and if so how can i solve this vulnerabilities till i implemment the upgrade. thanks in advance.

Hi folks, Just a quick hello having installed CentOS on my first box - an Acer Altos G310 (P4 2.8GHz, 768MB RAM with 70GB + 300GB storage. The 300GB unit is a SATA disk which I hope to software (hardware!?) mirror - if I'm in for any major fun mirroring a SATA drive do let me know now - I think hardware mirroring is not an option (yet!?) but I haven't checked this out completely. This

Hi all. Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer's problems ;-) ), since we've been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post here, so let's see, I have my faith on you. I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 . Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I try to do a yum update: yum

On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:00 -0600, asterisk-users- request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Andy Burns wrote: > > Shoval Tomer wrote: > > > >> Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production > system? > > > > > > when I tried the X100P drivers on FC3 I had problems with udev, the > > workaround didn't work for me, maybe

Moved samba (acting as a standalone system) from a RH9 system to a FC1 system. It wont authenticate the users. Here is more of the specifics: 1. Users log into a Samba PDC. 2. Login scripts setup their mappings 3. Some mappings are on the PDC (these still work) 4. Some mappings are on the standalone server. 5. The version of samba on RH9 is 2.2.7 6. The version of samba on FC1 is 3.0.4 I

Here we go again: Hi all. Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer?s problems ;-) ), since we?ve been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post here, so let?s see, I have my faith on you I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 . Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I try to do a yum update:

Hi, I will probably have to migrate a few servers running Red Hat 9 to CentOS and I'd like to have opinions. One server to migrate is running Fedora core 4. Reason for migrating to CentOS: no more security updates available, hardware change planned anyway. Here are the services to be migrated: sendmail pop (not sure which daemon, I think it is running the default daemon in RH9) DNS

Greetings, I've got 4 Redhat-9 servers in a production environment and I don't feel like moving to RHEL. So I'm testing CentOS-3.1 now. So far so good. I'd like to get these servers moved over in the next month or so to a better "supported" OS. Are there any issues I should be aware of in upgrades these RH-9 boxes? Should I be able to just stick in the Centos-3.1

I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: --------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -load request ignored. Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn

hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: > --------------------------------------------------- > [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll > Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol > _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > reference > -load request

I just upgraded my RH9 installation to Fedora 2. To my surprise, imapd seems to be gone from the core. I noticed there are now two IMAP servers docevot and cyrus. After reading brief descriptions of both, dovecot would seem to be more compatible with my setup. Especially since I'm using mbox's. I have 2 questions. It seems like dovecot does not support mailboxes inside of a

My desire to run Asterisk is finally giving me the reason to install a Linux box at home. Is RH9 the only distro that Asterisk will run on, and can anyone recommend a good source for a cheap Linux (RH9) box? For example, walmart.com has microtel boxes with no OS. Will RH9 and Asterisk run on these boxes? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi I am running a RH9 box in a w2k domain. I have installed winbind on the RH9 box joined it to the domain successfully. Domain users can login with their accounts. The problem is when they login they get a message stating that their home dir doesnt excists. How can i map their home dir that is on a w2k member server and how can i create their home dir on the RH9 box when the domain users login?