similar to: DTMF Mode supported by VoiceMail Application

Hi, I'm using Asterisk (1.2.4) as a voicemail system for our Softswitch. When forwarding a call to Voicemail, here is somehow what the softswitch sends to Asterisk : In INVITE : Vm Phone Number ( to route the call ) In To : Person who has been called ! In From : Person who was calling ! Of course, I need to send the call into the "Called User" Mailbox (Thus To SIP header) ! So

Hi all, I have been using asterisk to do such kind of thing, But I must admitt, this is not 100 % conveniant (Mainly because Asterisk isn't a SIP Proxy). I just wanted to know if you knew/used some kind of SBC or packages which would deal both with SIP AND RTP ! SER/OpenSER woulc be a good SIP Proxy ... but then how to deal with RTP ? Any tip, info greatly welcome ! Thanks, JM

Hi, I 've a proxy on my network where some calls are routed to .... And as well some extensions on my Asterisk Server. What I would like to do is to accept all incoming calls from the proxy, wherever they are coming from or going to ... but, as soon as I receive a call with the same number as one extension defined in Asterisk (but through the Proxy !) , it refuses the call, saying that there

Hi, I would like to return different values/cause to another SIP Server with Hangup cmd. I tried to put different values in Hangup(xx) ... but it always returns the same value ! How can I send back different error cause ? Thanks, Jean-Marc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I use in Production : Asterisk 1.2.9.1 We Use Asterisk as a SIP Transit Server to record centrally all the calls. The call flow would be: incoming calls : PSTN -> GW -SIP-> Asterisk(Record) -SIP-> Softswitch -> IP Phone outgoing calls : IP Phone -> Softswitch -SIP-> Asterisk(Record) -SIP-> GW -> PSTN Dial plan in Asterisk is quite simple: [record] exten =>

I'm confused a bit about the following and was hoping to get some answers on this group - What is exactly implied when we say asterisk can connect to a PSTN. Does it mean connecting to the PSTN via PRI/T1/E1? If yes, then I assume asterisk does not need to do any SS7 signaling and all it does (playing the role of a PBX) is to connect to a Class 5 Switch at the CO. Is this a correct statement?

Dear List; I am trying to create a link between Asterisk and My softswitch, the link to be SIP Trunk. I did the below configuration and I do not know if any one can help me and advise me to have better configuration to be sure that link is fine. But I do not know how to determine the SIP username to be sent for my softswitch as sometimes the softswitch need to check it. Also, does asterisk

Dear all what is softswitch what is difference between asterisk and softswitch ?? regards satish patel --------------------------------- Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Pardon my ignorance, but I was hoping someone could clear up something for me. - For a few POTS lines, digium has a single port card for that, or a T1 card to a channel bank. - For 10 or more lines, digium has a T1 or E1 card for that too based on PRI channels - For 100's to 1000's of lines, I suspect a soft-switch is in order??? A traditional phone company will sell: - POTS lines for

Hello everybody, Im new to the list and also new to asterisk, Im wondering if I could set up asterisk as a softswitch, I guess for what I've been reading that It could be possible but almost all the info and documentation Ive found so far is about asterisk as a PBX, etc. Im willing to set a small voip wholesale traffic bussiness and Im not quite sure asterisk is the right chocie for that.

Hello, ? I'm in a bit of a fix. We have a particular Windows based softswitch which is has its SIP and H323 ports hardcoded to listen on a particular IP address. The problem is that the ISP is having major issues and we can no longer depend on them for service. The softswitch will not listen on any other IP address and this can not be fixed. I was thinking of creating a NAT network wherein we

Dear Alex; Thanks alot for your nice help. This is if I need to let Asterisk register with another softswitch (so I used register =>), what if I need asterisk to send call for the softswitch without register to it (directly)? If I removed the register => then how it will distiguish the IP address in the "host" at the [sip_trunk] is the IP address of the softswitch that need to

Hello averybody, I'm looking the softswitch in digium website, anyone test the softswitch? Best Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20071202/2440f782/attachment.htm

Hi List; If I need to do a trunk between Asterisk and another SIP softswitch (so Asterisk will send a SIP calls to that softswitch), then I have to configure this on the sip.conf file or where exactly? And is it the same when I configure iax trunk? Should I determine the context in this case for this SIP trunk? Regards Bilal

I've been working in the VoIP industry for just a bit over a year now... Mostly taking care of the underlying systems. I've now reached the point where I'm being drawn more and more into the call processing side of things. My background is in computer and "classic" telephony systems (DMS250/MTX, DSC 400, T1, channel banks. telabs analog echo supressor modules and

Hello, I use both ser/asterisk . In fact i wish asterisk to forward all the sip requests which are not handled by domain=domain.tld in sip.conf Here is a diagram: The sip agents use the Sip proxy as an outbound sip proxy and domain=domain.tld . When the sip agents dial sip:user@otherdomain.tld so the request is sent to sip proxy and so to Asterisk. I wish Asterisk to Look up the

Source: xen Severity: normal User: debian-lts at lists.debian.org Usertags: upstream-trixie X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-lts at lists.debian.org Dear xen maintainers, Testing (trixie) currently ships xen 4.17, which, according to the upstream support matrix [x], will get security support until 2025-12-12. The latest upstream release (4.19) will get security support until 2027-07-29. I believe it would

Hello, I have found out that a domain administrator is always mapped to root in the UNIX filesystem: drwx------ 2 jive smbguests 1024 2004-12-23 18:59 jive drwx------ 13 salsa smbusers 1024 2004-12-23 18:58 salsa drwx------ 13 root smbadmins 1024 2004-12-23 18:56 tango jive is a domain guest user, salsa a domain user and tango a domain administrator. Is it possible to change the root

On 02/12/2019 15:21, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > yaml-bench is shipping in libclang-common-9-dev Ok possible. Though, it adds an unnecessary 46MB to my docker image. > It should be indeed in llvm-9-dev instead. This would hide the problem, right. I am not sure it's is a good solution. Where can we review the build process for the apt packages? On 02/12/2019 15:21, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:

Knorrie and I just discussed our plans for sid and buster, on the phone. Here's my notes of the discussion. Plan is to upload Knorrie's 4.11 packages to experimental, to make them more public, while we fix the bugs in them. There's a list of Salsa issues and the BTS bugs list. This duplication is not ideal. We agreed that new things should go to the BTS. For now we'll keep