similar to: Updates For Centos3

Greetings, 4 belated x86_64 updates here for CentOS-3 (I just got my 64-bit development boxes back from a show). They'll be hitting the mirrors eventually. Future updates will be much more timely. libxml2: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-615.html RPMS/libxml2-2.5.10-7.x86_64.rpm RPMS/libxml2-devel-2.5.10-7.x86_64.rpm RPMS/libxml2-python-2.5.10-7.x86_64.rpm

Hi everyone, Updates for 3 sets of packages. For centos 3. These updates should be finding their way to your local mirror shortly. libxml2: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-615.html RPMS/libxml2-2.5.10-7.i386.rpm RPMS/libxml2-devel-2.5.10-7.i386.rpm RPMS/libxml2-python-2.5.10-7.i386.rpm SRPMS/libxml2-2.5.10-7.src.rpm freeradius: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-609.html

Hi all, I've been approached by someone who has an installation of rhel ES 3 (taroon update 2) to see whether I can take over doing security and other updates for them (no current rhn subscription). What I want to know is, with a suitable yum setup can I use a centos3 repository to apply updates to this box? If so, should I source updates from centos 3.5? Does the whole box need to become a

While in centos3, using vim and clicking the backspace I see the ^? character instead of it actually deleteing the previous character. In centos4 this was not a problem. I have rad about remapping keys and such, but can someone tell me what the difference between centos4 and centos3 is so I can make the change to make it work on centos3.

Anyone using or recomend a content management system that will install without out a lot of mucky muck on a Centos3 system? I looked at Zope but it needs a newer Python, Midgaard looks likes it's geared towards RHEL4. OpenCMS looks like it runs on java so that might work. I have yet to look at Rubyrails and Django.

I don't see the tzdata updates for 2006m in the centos 3 mirrors ?!? http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/3/updates/i386/RPMS/ its here for centos4... http://mirror.centos.org/centos-4/4/updates/i386/RPMS/tzdata-2006m-3.el4.noarch.rpm and here for 2.1, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/updates/noarch/tzdata-2006m-3.el2_1.noarch.rpm so where is it for centos3 ?!? my RHN connected RHEL3 system

Hi all, I was wondering if it was existing a version 2.4.x of yum for CentOS3 somewhere ? Because the 2.0.x is so slow... Thanks for your help... M$-Internet Exploder est le cancer de l'Internet, voyez pourquoi ici : --> http://www.decroissance.info/Ateliers-Liberez-votre-ordinateur <-- Et plus vous ?viterez les produits Micro$oft, plus libres vous serez : ------------->

Hi Everyone More updates for Centos3 Available from: http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/3.1/ and soon your local mirror. Security: Mozilla: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-421.html updates/i386/RPMS/mozilla-1.4.3-3.0.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mozilla-chat-1.4.3-3.0.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mozilla-devel-1.4.3-3.0.2.i386.rpm

Anyone get kqemu to make in Centos3? I'm getting modules disabled messages, AFAIK module support is enabled, its the stock kernel. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/qemu-0.7.2/mips-softmmu' make -C kqemu make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/qemu-0.7.2/kqemu' make -C /lib/modules/2.4.21-37.EL/build SUBDIRS=`pwd` modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-37.EL' The

how is the stability of software raid1 on a system running centos3. i have 2 75gig hard drives that i would like to mirror if possible, that being the reliability is worth it...there will be lots of network traffic on the server. It will be used possibly as a file server, it will most definitely be used also as a mail server and webserver. i would be ok to me to not mirror the drives but this is

Hi, I've got a HP 380 G2 which is running RHEL AS 3 Taroon update 1. The current smp kernel 2.4.21-9smp is booting with a HPinitrd image. Mostlikely generated with the HP proliant Service Pack for RHEL 3. Now if I migrate this system to CentOS 3 and a new kernel will be installed ,will that work ? Does the new centOS kernel use the same config as the current RHEL kernel ? Anyone done this

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror RHSA-2004:174 Updated utempter package fixes vulnerability RHSA-2004:178 An updated LHA package fixes security vulnerabilities RHSA-2004:219 Updated tcpdump packages fix various vulnerabilities John. -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of

Dear sir; i am using redhat 9 on a production server and i plan to migrate to centos 3.1. the issue now is redhat 9 vulnerable to LHA package security vulnerabilities . and if so how can i solve this vulnerabilities till i implemment the upgrade. thanks in advance.

Hello, Sorry if this mail would have to be post in the development ML, but my problem is just at using centOS.. I'm trying to recompile the centOS-3.1 kernel. I done this: # cd /usr/src/linux-2.4 # make menuconfig < i select my CPU type > < Exit and save > # make dep # make modules (...no errors ...) gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include -Wall

Greetings, I'm investigating a bug in the PowerPC back end in which a load from a storage address is being reordered prior to a store to the same storage address. I'm quite new to LLVM, so I would appreciate some help understanding what I'm seeing from the dumps. I assume that some information is missing that would represent the memory dependency, but I don't know what form that

Hi Bill, Which scheduler do you use? MI or SDNode one? In either case the problem is likely the same, but cause might be in a different place... The way I see it, you have an issue with the alias analyzer, not scheduler. When scheduling DAG is constructed, AA is checked for pairs of mem accessing objects, and if no potential interference is flagged by the AA the chain edge is _not_ inserted.

On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 11:34 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > Thanks for the response! We just discovered there is likely a bug > happening during post-RA list scheduling. There's an invalid successor > index in the scheduling graph that is probably supposed to be the > missing arc. Starting to investigate further now. This is recorded in >

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Here's another data point that may be useful. [Scheduling experts, please help! :) ] If the two-byte bitfield is replaced by a two-byte struct (replace "short i:8" with "short i", etc.), the scheduler properly generates a dependency between the store and the load. For this case, a GEP is used instead of a bitcast:

If anyone would like to help test the latest RPM on Centos 3, heres your chance. There are several new features that are not mentioned in Jeff's email, but as he said he wants to make sure it does no harm more than anything else. As an example though, this version supports: - runtime depedency checking (think of being able to have cpan modules that weren't installed by rpm being