Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Re: [Serusers] high-availibility setup using f5 bigip"
2005 Mar 16
1
Re: [Serusers] ser+asterisk - security
Do some reading about contexts in *. Basically, you want all "public" sip requests to land in a dialplan context that has no access to PSTN, and requests from your own SER box(es) to land in another context (that DOES have access to PSTN).
You can achieve this by adding an entry to your sip.conf for your SER box with it's IP address (and context) specified.
----- Original
2005 Jun 28
0
RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
Sorry
it's asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
--- harry gaillac <gaillacharry@yahoo.fr> a ?crit :
> Luca,
>
> you may find help here:
>
> http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~somlo/CSU-SIP-notes/
>
http://www.asteriskdocs.org/
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+at+large
>
> ask for help to asterisk-users@lists.digium.org
>
> Regards
>
2004 May 31
0
Fwd: [Serusers] CDR mediation for VoIP
FYI, for those of you who aren't on the serusers list.
I'd like to hear how others can get this working in small Asterisk
settings; I don't really have the time to implement it, but it looks
very interesting.
JT
>To: serusers@iptel.org
>From: Adrian Georgescu <ag@ag-projects.com>
>Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 23:05:47 +0200
>Subject: [Serusers] CDR mediation for VoIP
2007 Aug 23
1
[Serusers] why combine ser with asterisk
Asterisk is an excellent PBX system, and makes a very good endpoint in
the SIP chain for all sorts of things -- IVR systems, voicemail
applications, automated messages, etc.
It has an extremely well-written CDR engine, so many people mesh it with
billing applications to produce accurate accounting information. It also
is fully aware of the media stream, which means it's capable of cutting
2006 Jun 25
0
RE : Re: [Serusers] CDRTool +Asterisk + Ser
Hello Robert,
Ser, Asterisk, Mysql and Freeradius are working fine ,
I'm feeling tired with CDRRTool .
I will use an other billing system.
Thanks for your answer.
Regards
Harry
--- Robert Zorop <rzorop@gmail.com> a ?crit :
> HI, i've got a working config of ser 0.9.6,
> freeradius, MySQL, and CDRTool
> 4.5.3. I can't get the quotaCheck script working, i
> think
2005 Jan 07
0
Re: [Serusers] softphones
Hi
I tried Xten, its very good, because it can stay in the taskbar (next to the
clock) and start when windows starts, and is allways ready to receive calls.
Maybe it s the best way to introduce VoIP to my company workers....
But theres a feature that s missing (or I couldnt find), there s no way to
connect this softphone with the adress book. I think this feature is very
important, because
2005 Jul 05
0
Re: [Serusers] NAT considerations...
You will also need your SIP clients that are behind the same NAT to
support ICE (Interactive Connectivty Establishment) if you want calls
between them. Xten Eyebeam and Snom phones are the only ones I'm
aware of that support it.
On 7/5/05, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez@redvoiss.net> wrote:
> And even worst.
> There are some kind of NAT that STUN does not work.
> You can check
2005 Jun 27
1
RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
I don't want to offend you but you should have a look
to sems .
You won't find docs to help you at asterisk.org
--- "lucape@inwind.it" <lucape@inwind.it> a ?crit :
> hello
>
> help me to configure ser + asterisk
> how to do the configuration?
>
> Luca
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
> 6X
2006 Sep 11
0
[Serusers] MS LCS 2005 / SER / Asterisk Integration
Hi to all,
I read
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/MS+LCS+2005+%252F+SER+%252F+Asterisk+Integration
Is it possible to use ser as a presence server instead
of LCS 2005 ?
Harry
___________________________________________________________________________
D?couvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet !
Yahoo! Questions/R?ponses pour partager vos
2005 Aug 24
0
Re: [Serusers] SER IP PBX for multiple clients
lqbal,
I do plan on having alot of users. Two markets I'm trying to get some
volume users from are: residential consumers and business users.
Residential consumers should get basic line services such as their
own DID, voicemail, caller-id, call-waiting, three-way calling, and
basically, all the standard features you get from companies like
Vonage, etc. This particular market base
2005 Aug 24
0
Re: [Serusers] SER IP PBX for multiple clients
Waldo,
How do you let your customers manage 'their' PBX. I too have a setup
like you. However, I installed a * server for each customer, via
vserver. I'd like to now what kind of software/webbased package you use
for this.
I also have SER installed as a front-end server for the * servers. But,
as I'm still not very into SER, don't know exactly how this fits in.
Should I use
2005 Jun 22
1
Re: [Serusers] ASTERISK+SER+MWI
What's wrong with ARA (asterisk realtime architecture)
from voip-info:
Asterisk, SER and MWI
http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-December/013727.html
Actually I wrote a patch for this and it supports
ast_data too. What you do is tell asterisk that all of
your phones IP addresses are your SER machine. Then
when a message gets left Asterisk sends the NOTIFY to
username at
2005 May 29
0
[Serusers] QOS of VoIP
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@iptel.org
http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
2007 Aug 10
9
Problems monitoring Mongrel with F5 BigIP
If this has already been covered, please point me to that (I didn''t find
anything in my searches)...
We are using F5 BigIP LTM load balancers. They have many pools of Mongrels
they load balance across, and I of course want the F5 to know when a Mongrel
goes down or is unavailable, etc. To do that, I need to have an F5 health
monitor for HTTP make a request to the Mongrel. We do this
2005 Sep 28
0
Problem redirecting to voicemail through a SIP proxy (Looks like a bug)
I'm having a problem redirecting to voicemail. This may be an asterisk bug
I'm not sure, can somebody confirm?
Network layout
GATEWAY - Asterisk 1.0.8-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8h connected to a PRI line.
(Additionally patched with http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=2687)
PROXY - Ser version: ser 0.9.3 (i386/freebsd)
FEATURE - Asterisk 1.0.8-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8h handling voicemail.
2011 Nov 18
4
BigIP and Puppet
Has anyone successfully puppetized BigIP (F5)?
I''m specifically trying to figure out a path in making our BigIP
instances be under puppet so all the VIPs, pools, profiles, etc. are
all under puppet control. My requirements are probably going to be
fulfilled even with just uploading a rules file if a delta''s detected.
The main issue I have now is figuring out when to reload the
2004 Mar 31
2
SER Asterisk problem
Hi All.
I'am using Asterisk with SER. I can make call between two internal VoIP
gateways or from na internal to external VoIP gateway. But when I get a
external call, this call hang ups 5 seconds after and I reveive the
following messages
*CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/16008-3d17",
"SIP/16007&SIP/16006|20|tr") in new stack
-- Called 16007
-- Called 16006
2005 Aug 28
1
SER + ASTERISK voicemail
Hello,
I try set Ua---SER----Asterisk (voicemail/ARA)
|
Ua
ser stable
asterisk cvs head
I read
http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-February/015997.html
to forward unavailable or busy sip agents to asterisk
voicemail in failure route.
How may I configure extensions.conf and ser.cfg ?
I have been trying without success!
Regards
Harry
2005 Jun 27
0
RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
Beautiful.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kohlsmith
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:48 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Serusers] *** SER - Asterisk
On Monday 27 June 2005 14:50, harry gaillac wrote:
> I don't want to offend you but you
2005 Oct 28
2
VLAN tagging problems
We are using Centos behind an F5 Bigip load balancer.
The linux box is using bonding and tagged VLAN's
Everything works fine except that when traffic is forwarded from the BigIP
to the linux box on the VLAN where the web server is running the linux box
returns the traffic on the wrong VLAN, It returns traffic on the lowest
ordered VLAN.
ie. here is a tcpdump on my load balancer showing