similar to: Helping out?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings folks, I'm currently redoing my home server as one of the hard drives in my RAID-1 array went down and I'm going to replace the lot of it with a 3Ware Escalade 9500S RAID capable card and four Seagate 200GB SATA drives. These drives are supposedly the coolest and quietest SATA drives available (better than the Maxtors I had anyway)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings again folks, One of the things I like about Fedora Core is the fact that I can add apt as a repository tool. Has anyone done this for CentOS-3? Why was yum chosen? I prefer apt over yum because of features and was wondering if anyone had created an apt repository for CentOS. Thanks in advance for the info, I'm not trying to start an

Hello all, Just need some info to clarify something. How is 3.3? By word of mouth I heard that their may have been some issues with it. However I have not heard anything here on this forum or any problems with RHE3 U3. So I am assuming all is well. Please verify if possible. Thanks all Dominic Iadicicco _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register

Roger Price wrote, On 12/4/2013 12:35 PM: > I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more > complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its > components have started operation but does not automatically log their > activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this > under-reporting of important facts is too minimalist -

On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Kris Jordan wrote: > Roger Price wrote, On 12/4/2013 12:35 PM: >> I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its components have started operation but does not automatically log their activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this under-reporting of

I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its components have started operation but does not automatically log their activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this under-reporting of important facts is too minimalist - it would be better for system administrators and for the nut

Anyone read the rough cuts of this book? I''m interested in checking it out because Bruce Tate''s work is always great. How does it compare to the agile books (2nd edition) in terms of timeliness, difficulty, etc. Thanks! Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm wondering how much performance boost there is to tinc if cipher and digest are set to none. In my application, I need to re-broadcast time not security sensitive information to a bunch of connected remote users. The information is usually disseminated in a LAN where there is not an issue with either security or performance. However, for the connected remote users in number of twenty

<dag at cray.com> writes: > Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: > >>> Really, patches get dropped *all the time* to the point where pings are >>> a regular part of the development process. That's a huge waste of time >>> for everyone. >> >> It's only a waste of time if your workflow is entirely synchronous >> with patch

On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Roger Price wrote: > I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its components have started operation but does not automatically log their activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this under-reporting of important facts is too minimalist - it would be

> - I have to *remember* I submitted the patch (not hard, but it is a > cost). If you forgot, the chances are high that the patch was unimportant. I do my development on local git branches, so every time I do `git branch`, I'm reminded. There's really no overhead. > - I have to save that e-mail from llvm-commits so I can refer to it when > the inevitable ping is

Greetings everyone, I've got a problem with my fileserver running CentOS 3.1. The kernel seems to crash about once a day (inevitably when I'm not present), forcing me to reboot. This behavior started after I applied the new kernel patch (2.4.21-15.0.3.EL.c0). I've left it on 2.4.21-15.0.2 for a little bit to see if it will crash tonight/tomorrow. As this may be a hardware

Charles Lepple wrote, On 12/4/2013 4:11 PM: > On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Kris Jordan wrote: > >> Roger Price wrote, On 12/4/2013 12:35 PM: >>> I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its components have started operation but does not automatically log their activity when UPS's switch

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: >> - I have to *remember* I submitted the patch (not hard, but it is a >> cost). > > If you forgot, the chances are high that the patch was unimportant. I > do my development on local git branches, so every time I do `git > branch`, I'm reminded. There's really no overhead. Every time you have to check it's

Recently I'm getting these errors on my slave when adding new domains: Sep 26 13:48:27 hosting named[1668]: zone wholesaletvtime.com/IN: refresh: unexpected rcode (SERVFAIL) from master 207.218.174.4#53 The master/slave transfers work for the other 1000+ domains that I have, just not the handful of new ones that I just added after the CentOS 4.3 -> 4.4 upgrade. I regenerated the

Hello, We're getting around to upgrading our mail server and here are the quick specs: MegaRAID SCSI 320-2X http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/scsi_320_2x.html TYAN Transport TA26 B2882T26U8H 2U Barebone Server-Rackmount - Retail http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?item=N82E16856152007 plus RAM, CPU and 4 SCSI drives setup in a RAID-5 Is that MegaRAID controller supported in

Hi, I'm about to copy the contents of one server onto another. The "plan" that I've come up with is: 1) boot the new server with a live disc, partition accordingly 2) a big tar-over-ssh for the /boot, and root partitions (that's all there is) 3) adjust the fstab so that it'll find the new scsi partitions vs. the old ATA ones. 3) then chroot into the new system

> On Jul 4, 2015, at 1:23 PM, Stephen M. Jones <smj at cirr.com> wrote: > > Hello, I searched through the archives and found a suggestion for a > cyrillic DJ to put the following in icecast.xml: > > <mount> > <mount-name>/mountnamehere</mount-name> > <charset>UTF-8</charset> > </mount> > I've not made any more

David A. Green wrote: > I find llvm-commits daunting. So much that I hesitate to do reviews. > As Chris commented, I am not very active on that list. There's a reason > for that beyond lack of time. So the goal is to make it easier for a member of the community to review only commits to a sub-tree that interests them? Let's say it may or may not be easier for reviewers to

I have had good sucess with the par(mfrow=c(#,#)) for formating graphs and they look good to me. I have seen a lot of use of the lattice package and thought I would go fishing on the list for y'all's comments. Is there a time when lattice would be easier more appropriate for certain graphics over par(mfrow(#,#)). Just wondering Stephen -- Let's not spend our time and resources