similar to: need help getting a word right

Hi, I''m trying out RSpec with the heckle option (for mutation testing). Problem is that heckle goes into an infinite loop when running it on an example. I want to send a "--verbose" to heckle but can''t find a way to do that through the spec binary. Since this is not an uncommon situation when using heckle I would like this to be supported in some way by RSpec.

I''m just getting started with rspec, I''m running on edge for both. In a fresh project, I freeze edge, install the edge rspec plugin. I generate a simple rspec_model and run the spec. It passes. When I run rake spec:doc, I get the following output: - NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) where the specification should be. In fact if I just make a pending spec, it does the same.

This is pretty much the same as last time around, if you recall. Thanks to Wilson for converting to the new form. I''ve added a few lines. Basically, it iterates over your model associations and does two things. - First, just try to call the association. Usually fixes speeling erors or other such silliness. - Second, try to find a record with an :include on the association. This

Hi, I'm currently working on porting some SAS scripts to R, and hence need to do the same calculation (and get the same results) as SAS in order to make the transition easier for users of the script. In the script, I'm dealing with a two-factorial repeated-measures anova. I'll try to give you a short overview of the setup: - two between-cell factors: facBetweenROI (numbering

Hi list, can anyone point me at some consise info on when rsync is capable of performing incremental updates of binary files? I need to rsync over a network, and currently I have this over an NFS share but I suppose that even if binary updates are possible there not going to do much good as reading the remote file over NFS to check what needs to be updated will use the same bandwidth as copying

I'm an experimental psychologist and when I run ANOVA analysis in SPSS, I normally ask for a test of non-sphericity (Box's M-test). I also ask for output of the corrections for non-sphericity, such as Greenhouse-Geisser and Huhn-Feldt. These tests and correction factors are commonly used in the journals for experimental and other psychology reports. I have been switching from SPSS to R

Chris Lattner wrote: > LLVM Compiler Infrastructure -- Release 1.3 > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >We are pleased to announce the release of version 1.3 of the LLVM >Compiler Infrastructure. > > > Great news, thanks. However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for cygwin? I followed the instructions and tried to

Chris Lattner wrote: >On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Robert Feldt wrote: > > > >>However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for >>cygwin? >> >> > >Nope, we don't have one yet, sorry. > > > >>I followed the instructions and tried to build them myself but get >>when building the cfrontend. Any ideas? >>

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1308 Summary: pam handling change breaks pam_abl module Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: PAM support AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

I''ve tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some way to supply extra options to heckle via. rspec? Scott

Hi, I'm still trying to figure out that GLM procedure in SAS. Let's start with the simple example: PROC GLM; MODEL col1 col3 col5 col7 col9 col11 col13 col15 col17 col19 col21 col23 =/nouni; repeated roi 6, ord 2/nom mean; TITLE 'ABDERUS lat ACC 300-500'; That's the same setup that I had in my last email. I have three factors: facSubj,facCond and facRoi. I had this pretty

I have 3 questions (below). Background: I am teaching an introductory statistics course in which we are covering (among other things) repeated measures anova. This time around teaching it, we are using R for all of our computations. We are starting by covering the univariate approach to repeated measures anova. Doing a basic repeated measures anova (univariate approach) using aov() seems

Hey all - The trunk currently supports three types of mocking/stubbing: Mock Objects (created dynamically at runtime) Partial Mocking of methods on existing classes Stubbing of methods on existing objects or classes The main difference between Partial Mocking and Stubbing is that Stubs don''t verify. I''m wondering if we really need the stubbing facility at all, given that we

Could anyone tell me a better way to achieve the output of this for loop? It seems to run quite slow. I'm sure there must be a more consise way to sum from FN to LN, excluding positive values, for each row. #sum between FN and LN, excluding positive values for(i in 1:R){ for(j in FN[i]:LN[i]){ if(Temp[i,j]<0) sum[i] <- sum[i] + sum(Temp[i,j])}} Cheers, R -- View this message in

I''m wanting to write a spec that a model is applying an :order option to a find call, but I don''t want to completely specify all of the find parameters. So I want to write something like this, say in a controller spec User.should_receive(:find).with(:all, hash_with_at_least(:order => ''user.name ASC'')) get ''index'', :sort =>

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1308 --- Comment #6 from Tom Cox <tomc at hot.rr.com> 2007-06-24 03:12:38 --- Created an attachment (id=1312) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1312) Change prevents pam_end from being called with current status. File shows problem introduced in session.c, version 1.346. -- Configure bugmail:

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Robert Feldt wrote: > However, when I go back to rebuild llvm, reconfigure, setting the > CFEINSTALL dir, then make it can build the tools ok but not the > runtime: [snip] > Compiling crtend.c to bytecode > Files/ATI: not found [snip] > I don't understand the error message since I see no reference to > Files/ATI. Any clues? Can

Hi, [System info: R 1.6.1 compiled from source (no args to configure) on Redhat 7.1 Linux i/386] I have some spatial statistics programs that recently (since R 1.6.1) have generated SIGSEGV. These R programs use the splancs library as well as some C code of my own for Voronoi analysis. The program has a big loop to fit various model parameters against a spatial distribution of biological

I have a step definition like this: Then "the account should be created" do account = Account.find_by_name("my shiny new account") p account.class account.should_not be_blank end When running this step, I got the error message: Account(id: integer, name: string, state: string, next_renewal_at: date, created_at: datetime, updated_at: datetime, full_domain: string,

The floating-point expectations allow for an error tolerance. Is there any similar facility for dates? For example, say I have a custom class that handles date/time spans and I want to spec it: context "A DateRange span" do specify "should know when a week ago is :)" do d = DateRange.new d.last_week.should_be_close_to(1.week.ago, 24*60*60) end end The idea