similar to: Open/Closed Ports

Hi, I have updated the kernel to 2.4.21-27.0.2 on Centos 3.4 (was 3.3 when I did the kernel update) and have modified grub.conf to use the single CPU kernel: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. #

First off, please excuse the cross post between lartc and netfiler, the line between the two is very blurred here (at least for me)... A thought just crossed my mind now while working on a new iptables/tc collaboration for a project. I use iptables to basically seal off a linux gateway, we''re very restrictive on what users can do on the connection. For now I''m using destination

Using Shorewall v1.2, and testing the firewall using scan.sygate.com, I am informed that several ports (web (80), ident (113) and DCE locator (135) are ''closed'' rather than ''blocked''. All other ports show as blocked or ''stealthed''. I haven''t set up any rules or policies that have anything to do with 80, 113 or 135. Is this

Dear netters, My linux box is installed with samba 3.0.0 and joined with NT domain (w2k based). Samba are working fine, until I filter the incoming traffic using iptables (v1.2.7a) on default RedHat 9 kernel 2.4.20-8, using these rules: [root@Bhp-0m03-0472 root]# cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables # Generated by iptables-save v1.2.7a on Sun Oct 12 19:36:36 2003 *filter :INPUT DROP [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

Hello, I have the following problem: On a solaris 10 machine, with 5 "zones" there is a process that is talking to the wrong db server. I need to find out which process this is, so I can analize this further. I have tried to doing this using tcpsnoop from the DTrace toolkit, but without success. This is what I''ve done. First I started tcpsnoop, dumping it''s output

Hi, I''m new to shorewall and to this list. I just switched from custom iptables-based scripts to shorewall, and everything seems to work smoothly. There''s only one thing I wasn''t able to port : rules similar to this one : iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 5190 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 5190 Can this be expressed using shorewall config files ? Or

Reading the documentation there is conflicting information: According to https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/GlusterFSonCentOS we only need port TCP open between 2 GlusterFS servers: Ports TCP:24007-24008 are required for communication between GlusterFS nodes and each brick requires another TCP port starting at 24009. According to

hi all: the following scipt is wokring perfectly with limiting ...on limimitng per ip basis.. ---- eth0=public static ip eth2= private ip ( 192.168.2.1) -- iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 192.168.0.0/32 -d 192.168.2.101/32 -j MARK --set-mark 21012 tc class add dev eth2 parent 1:1 classid 1:2101 htb rate 32kbit ceil 64kbit tc filter add dev eth2 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 2 handle

I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

When you run your functional tests, rake wipes the "test" database clean and recreates it based on what is in the "development" database. Since it appears you are using the same database for both, that would explain why you lost your data. In addition, if you omit the data needed to access the development database you will get an error like you described, because

I have an incoming 800-number over IAX from Teliax and I'm experiencing the large packet loss on connection. When a call comes in there is no ring tone and the first few words of the welcome message are cut off, regardless of the delay I set. Standard call (not 800-number) coming over IAX with the same provider works just fine only the tall free number. So it seems there are some packet loss

Hello, I''m having a trouble when I try to connect RoR and Oracle. I believe that it has something to do with database.yml, this is how my database.yml looks: development: adapter: oci database: 127.0.0.1:1521/XE username: system password: y1984nip0359 host: 127.0.0.1 And this is the Error that i get: -> http://127.0.0.1:3000/blog OCIError in BlogController#index

Sorry, in my haste I forgot to modify the subject. 5/2/06, "Christian R. Garner" <olus@digitalapathy.net>wrote: > > All assumptions aside, "rectest" and "salt" are usernames not > databases/schemas according to the pasted config. If they were in fact > different databases/schemas, this problem could never have happened. > While >

Hi, I'm on a Dell VEP 1405 running Debian 9.11 and I'm running a few tests with various interfaces given in PCI passthrough to a qemu/KVM Virtual Machine also running Debian 9.11. I noticed that only one of the four I350 network controllers can be used in PCI passthrough. The available interfaces are: *# dpdk-devbind.py --status Network devices using kernel driver

hey guys, I have a really silly question for you! I just built a cobbler server that I am using to bare metal some boxes. But I am a bit n00b and need to figure out which ports to open in iptables. Here's a start: xinetd 2031 root 8u IPv4 94306 UDP *:tftp in.tftpd 9203 root cwd DIR 253,0 4096 588097 /tftpboot

Hi all, I need my rsync to listen on port 8090 as well as on the standard rsync port. Is this possible, and if so, how does one do this? Thanks! Robert -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

I need help. I'm trying to connect with an Oracle DBMS and MySQL DBMS, I'm using RJDBC package. My code is the next: library('rJava') library('DBI') library('RJDBC') //Mysql drv <- JDBC("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver","C:\\Temporal\\mysql-connector-java-3.0.9-stable-bin.jar","'") conn <- dbConnect(drv,

Hi all, We are planning to shift our sip users from one platform to another. (basically from one asterisk server to another). the problem we are facing is that both asterisk servers are using different ports to listen for sip. and both have live customers on them. provisioning their ata's is not a good option for us coz of our settup. we cant just ask the customers to change their ports for

Hello, I was trying to compare the performance of icc, gcc and llvm on the program almabench.c in Coyote Benchmark suite. Here is a line of code from the program. da = da + (ca[np][k] * cos(arga) + sa[np][k] * sin(arga)) * 0.0000001; gcc and icc are performing way better than llvm as they are using 'sincos' library function to compute the sin and the cos of the argument in a