similar to: Testing Rails Associations

Hi, it would be nice to have the touch option in has_many associations also. I have a scenario like this: An user has some credit (money) and some advertises. Each advertise can be enabled or disabled depending on some rules. One of the rules is that the user should have money. Each time the money of the user change, the advertises are touched, enabled/disabled and then cached, as they are much

Can someone clarify this for me? Suppose I have two tables like: class Company < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :category end class Category < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :companies end I understand that the belongs_to causes related companies to be read from the db when I ask for a category. I suspect SQL something like select * from categories, companies where category.id

Basically, how do I do this "The Rails Way(tm)" SELECT * FROM beta_users u LEFT JOIN beta_codes c ON u.id = c.beta_user_id AND c.code IS NULL At the moment I''m using find_by_sql, and that works Ok, but what would be the Rails way? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

I''ve tested this on both 2.3 RC2 and Edge. This pastie contains model, helper and view: http://pastie.org/415742 When I save a vocabulary - its terms don''t save. I''m fairly sure it worked in RC1. Would appreciate any insight. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

I recently wrote a matcher for testing AR associations which allows you to specify things like: Foo.should have_many(:bars).through(:bazes) I''m pretty darned proud of it and a couple of people have suggested that I should submit it to the rspec_on_rails project. Before I go to the trouble of writing out rdoc and fully spec''ing it, I just wanted to make sure this was

Hi there, I''ve been working on this for awhile and have finally decided to ask for a little guidance.I have a slight problem trying to save a selection. I have two models: A "Posting" has_many "Categories", and a "Category" belongs_to one "Posting". With that said, in the posting model I have "has_many :categories" and within the

Hi, Found a simple example breaking on moving to 2.2 from 2.0. This example illustrates the usage of nested :include finder options. class Book < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :distributors end class Distributor < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :book has_many :agents end class Agent < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :distributor has_many :shops end class Shop <

Hello everyone, I''m new in contributing and i saw in the contributing-guides, that i have to write an email at this list. I hope, that''s the right place for this. If it''s not, i''M really sorry.. ;) Could someone please give me feedback about this lighthouse-ticket?

I want to find out what are the associations with another active record class. So If my class is as below: Class Component < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :branches end class Branch < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :component end and then I do Component.reflections[:branches].active_record I would expect that to be Branch but it is in fact Component. The inspection of

Hi all, Does anyone know how to get radrails to use RSpec specs instead of tests? Cheers --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hello all, I''m currently having an issue with some specs, specifically scope issues (probably more of a scope issue than a spec issue at this point)... Here''s the error: ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch in ''A new User should know what role it has'' Role expected, got NilClass D:/ruby/projects/restful_authentication_test/config/../app/models/role.rb:5:in

Right now you can use either Pens/Balance/Pound to put in front of some Mongrels and it works really good (easy to setup too!). I got to thinking, would it be possible to mimic what Pens/Balance/Pound does in pure Ruby (yeah, I know the answer is yes)? I guess I''m looking for a starting point. Does one simply write an HTTP listener that then redirects the calls to Mongrel? Is

Hello list, I think I have a rails related RSpec problem with a mock going out of scope on a recursive call to a model. The code is at: http://pastie.textmate.org/79821 if you want to see it highlighted. I have pasted it below as well. Basically, I have an acts_as_nested_set model called "Node", which works fine. I have a function which finds the language name of the node instance.

Can anyone explain to me the sql query done in the last step : http://pastie.org/402200 -- Arpit Jain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group,

Hey people, I''m starting a new project and just finished creating the ERM diagram with about 30 tables. There are quite some tables with foreign keys so I''m not sure how to start creating the controllers/models. How should I start creating controllers/models? Should I first create all tables without foreign key? Should I just start somewhere and add them radomly? I''m

Is there a better way to do this? It looks really ugly! http://pastie.org/1640550 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Just starting a new thread so that it''s easy to follow. I just submitted a patch at trac to add a new class method called "set_default_values" ( not a great name I think ), which lets you do all kinds of crazy stuff with setting default values. This ticket is at http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9093 and example pastie is at http://pastie.caboo.se/81925 It also lets you make

Hi. In this setup "account has_many :consultations". Can anyone explain the following behaviour to me? Rails 1.2.2. The "sum" method should return 0 for an empty array. >> a = Account.find(1) => #<Account:0x39c80a8 @attributes={...} >> a.consultations => [] >> a.consultations.sum(&:foo) ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (1 for 2)

Hi, I'm not clear with the aliasing rules for the pointer pointing to const memory. It will be great help if someone clarify my doubts. Consider below test program: int foo(int *A, int *B, const int *C, int len) { for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) A[i] = B[i] + *C; } In this test case the type for "C" is const int * type, it means the pointer is pointing to a memory which is

Is there an easy way to programatically work out the associations on a model? If not, is there a positive reason it was omitted, or is it just something that hasn''t been implemented yet? Thanks Gareth