similar to: TE405P V2 - Fantastic!

Hello! Is it legal to use RedirectAction to redirect a call that is waiting in a queue? The idea is to have an external application manage a queue via manager API. The queue would merely collect calls and play moh. I've tryed this already but asterisk sends SIP/Forbidden to the channel in queue, after the channel has been redirected by RedirectAction, even though the response to

Hello We have discovered a problem with DTMF on Asterisk. We have a setup with a T1 from PSTN going into an Asterisk box, and then out again on T1 and into a normal PBX (EADS) We use it to record all calls going to/from the PBX. The problem is that when we record the calls (with MONITOR command), DTMF tones gets obscured, and is not understood in the other end, if we dont Monitor, there are no

Feeling once again like an idiot, I come to the list for help... While my carrier (MCI vi PRI, fwiw) was trying to diagnose a problem, they asked me to put my interface in loopback -- and I couldn't figure out what they meant or how to do it. I've plugged a loopback *connector* into my 405p and tested it internally, but they wanted something that, apparently, looped back _their_

Hello, We have finished our tests of the new Digium firmware on the quad T1 cards(TE405P/TE410P). Overall it is a big improvement over the version 1 firmware. Here's the review: http://astguiclient.blogspot.com/2005/09/digium-405p-v2-review.html MATT--- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi! I am in the process of upgrading our 1.2 servers to 1.6. We have a lot of realtime extensions with app=Macro and appdata=stdexten|080512|SIP/080512 But this does not work in 1.6. It is expecting , and not | as the argument seperator. If I change the | to , then it does not work in 1.2. Is there any backwards compatible switch you can enable in 1.6, so it accepts | as a argument seperator

Hi! We have some problems with calls that get disconnected in the middle of a call. We are using Asterisk 1.2.1 with a TE410P (2.gen firmware). When the call is disconnected Asterisk writes this to the log: Jan 9 14:56:17 DEBUG[4404] dsp.c: ast_dsp_busydetect detected busy, avgtone: 300, avgsilence 2090 Jan 9 14:56:17 DEBUG[4404] dsp.c: Requesting Hangup because the busy tone was detected on

Hello, I would like to know if FreeBSD has drivers for TE405P cards submitted to the ports. I have acquired a card and would really like to use it with FreeBSD. The wiki said the drivers havent been tested yet. Have there been any updates since then? regards Kavit _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com

Hi, I have some interesting problem with htb , I set up root class and sub-classess: $TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1990kbit ceil 2000kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 190kbit ceil 200kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 1400kbit ceil 1600kbit $TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:1

I have a TE410P running on CentOS 4 which (fortunately) is my test system. This card has been working flawlessly for the past few weeks. Today I did a cvs update to the latest head files, and the card is now not working. When I try a zaptel start, a series of messages appears on the console: Found TE410p at base address fdff0000, remapped to f8a34000 TE410P version c01a010b, burst ON, slip

I have a number of servers with TE405P cards. The servers are DELL 1850's (which I _NOW_ see are listed on the digium "not recommended page" because of the ethernet interface). The problem I have is only during bridged calls. If I place a call into a service hosted on the box, or out to a VOIP phone, audio is crystal clear. If place a call "through" the box (a bridged

Forget the sound card. It isn't related. The subject above should have read 'TE405P No Voice Problem' or something similar. It appears to be a zaptel timing issue, but I have found a workaround. For those of you just tuning in, here is the story: I have a CentOS/Intel 865 box currently running Asterisk 1.2.7.1 and zap 1.2.5, both compiled from the source available off the main

Anyone care to elaborate on the differences between the T400P and the TE405P? -Darren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/e817f8bb/attachment.htm

This works fine. Message: 26 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:22:23 +0800 From: "Ma Zhiyong" <mazhiyong@sohu.com> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] te405p and dell poweredge To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <004501c56b42$6a12fcd0$7301a8c0@hylaclient> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Hi, I want to install * and te405p on Dell Poweredge 1850. Can I

http://www.mixdown.ca/~asterisk/ The card seems to be working fine. Don't expect warranty on it though. :-) Why? Because I wanted a quad-span T1 card which worked in the high-end systems I was intending it for, but that I could also keep a few in stock and if the system mainboard failed, pull the card an put it in a standard PC system. I didn't want to have to stock 3.3V and 5V

Hi, I want to install * and te405p on Dell Poweredge 1850. Can I do that successfully? Any one has successful experience on that scenario? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050607/fb7408a1/attachment.htm

Hi Everybody, Is there anyone who already uses Asterisk with TE405P card? Is this card going well with the old E400P or T400P drivers? Are there a lot of differences? In the card's data sheet writes this sentece: "Digium has designed the TE405P to be fully compatible with existing software applications..." Is this meaning the the old drivers are also OK for this card? Thank you

Is there anything to choose, in performance, between a TE405P and a TE410P? I understand the difference between the PCI bus voltages, and certainly don't intend to try Andrew's hacksaw operation :-). But if I choose the card first, and a compatible mobo second, does it make any difference which? Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play:

Can anybody tell me the difference between a TE410P and a TE405P? Is it JUST the 5v vs 3.3v pcis slot spec, or is there some thing else? </edg>

Hi, I've got an * box with 4 E1 (TE405P) and a Class 4 Cirpack switch (www.cirpack.com). <IP Network>--<*>-[TE405P]-<Cirpack>-<Public PSTN Network> ISDN interco is EuroIsdn, ports are configured ccs, hdb3, crc4. Cirpack is Network, * is Terminal/User. As I encountered some pb with Sip to Zap transcoding (* to Cirpack way poor quality, the other way fine), I

We originally purchased a TE405P so we could connect our Asterisk server directly to the T1 PRI from our provider, however due to all the problems reported with T1 PRI's interacting directly with Asterisk, we scrapped that idea and decided to stick with our Cisco router making the conversion to SIP. Anyways, we found a new potential use for it. We have an old location with an existing PBX,