similar to: vm notif

Hmmm.... Can't place calls... Can't access website... Neither of the 3 nameservers answer anything... Anyone heard/know something to explain all this?

why there is no general dependency analysis for the "machin code"? perhaps it's because the instruction scheduling is only implemented for sparcv9? i am going to implement a dependency analysis pass for machine code block. the result will be returned in a boost graph (http://www.boost.org/libs/graph/doc/table_of_contents.html). just to check if it has already been implemented. it

The new SUBREG target-independent instructions aren't getting mayLoad/mayStore flags set correctly. For example, in the generated X86GenInstrInfo.inc file, there is only one entry for INSERT_SUBREG: { 5, 4, 1, 0, "INSERT_SUBREG", 0, 0, NULL, NULL, OperandInfo107 }, // Inst #5 = INSERT_SUBREG THe sixth field is zero, which means it doesn't have the the

On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 14:45 +0800, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > why there is no general dependency analysis for the "machin code"? > perhaps it's because the instruction scheduling is only implemented > for sparcv9? Most backends use the SelectionDAG infastructure to do this kind of thing. (Simplifying things a bit) Each basic block is selected to a DAG based IR. Then

I guess this is slightly offtopic, but the post about the JIT and garbage collection made me wonder why LLVM supports JIT compilation at all. It has much smaller scope for optimisation due to the speed requirements, takes more memory and causes the same work to be repeated over and over for each execution. What reason is there for anything to use JIT compilation over ahead-of-time compiling to

On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:17 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > I guess this is slightly offtopic, but the post about the JIT and garbage > collection made me wonder why LLVM supports JIT compilation at all. It has > much smaller scope for optimisation due to the speed requirements, takes > more memory and causes the same work to be repeated over and over for each > execution. > >

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:56:48 -0500, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > Granted, LLVM currently doesn't really do much of this, but the > infastructure is there to do so. Right, but you can get this by doing profile directed optimisation during development so end users/production systems don't have the overhead. Also it seems to me that at some point the bookkeeping and analysis overhead for

On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > The new SUBREG target-independent instructions aren't getting > mayLoad/mayStore flags set correctly. > > For example, in the generated X86GenInstrInfo.inc file, > there is only one entry for INSERT_SUBREG: > > { 5, 4, 1, 0, "INSERT_SUBREG", 0, 0, NULL, NULL, > OperandInfo107 }, // Inst #5 =

Hi David, > On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:55 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi Quentin, > > On 18 Nov 2015, at 19:26, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> In the section “Goals", I defined (repeated for people that saw the talk) the goals for the Global ISel design. >> - Do you see

I am running samba-3.0.10 on a Solaris 8 box. The server is running as a DOMAIN_MEMBER in an Active Directory Domain. It has 8G of memory and 2 cpus. The smbd processes are started from inetd.conf. Lately, the server's load has been staying very high, from 10 - 14 and the smbd processes fluctuate between 1200 and 1600. This causes performance to suffer and clients start to complain that

Hiya. I'm in the middle of (re)developing a authentication system for an internet cafe here in Sydney. By complete accident I discovered the PDB MySQL plugin for samba yesterday in CVS - amazing. Haven't tried this yet (waiting for samba to compile on a really slow machine, heh) but it looks great. Is anybody using this? Would you recommend it for use in a heavy use type

Just a poll because I am curious, what kind of call volume do you see? Calls/Day -Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050909/9b8adf09/attachment.htm

I don't know the current status of the LLVA project, so I will let the current developers chime in. Please send all LLVM and LLVA questions to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu . ----- Forwarded message from N O S P A M <ti_dak at yahoo.com> ----- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:47:32 -0800 (PST) From: N O S P A M <ti_dak at yahoo.com> Subject: LLVA, TAO Intent, Morphun, DualCor Hello I want to

So, I'm bringing a discussion that has thus far been on llvm-commits to llvmdev because I finally (and thanks for helping me understand this Andy) understand what is *really* going on, and I think lots of others need to be aware of this and involved to figure out the right path forward. You can find the full review thread and more context under the subject "[PATCH][PM] Add pass run

Hi, I'm trying to compile linux kernel with llvm to generate llvm ir (bitcode). It seems like llvm-ld doesn't accept any linker scripts. How do I deal with vmlinux.lds in such a case? How did people who have compiled linux kernel with llvm deal with this in the past? Thanks, Ashish

I'd like to get some runtime profile data on my code using LLVM. The various -insert-X-profiling passes seem to add the profiling instrumentation to the code, but how do I actually generate profiling output? It seems like utils/profile.pl can do this, but it uses profile_rt.so which doesn't exist. I can manually compile the runtime directory using make install-bytecode, but it

Yes, I would hate for some library implementer to either interpret the standard differently or simply not consider the issue of recursive parallelism at all and end up with an implementation that doesn't support it (not that unlikely considering it went 1.5 years through committee as you said and the topic never came up). On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:25 AM Bryce Lelbach <balelbach at

> > Do you have plans to add other intrinsics? I'm curious as to why there > > is an llvm.sin intrinsic and an llvm.cos intrinsic, but no llvm.atan > > intrinsic. Why is there an llvm.pow intrinsic but no llvm.log > > intrinsic? > > Intrinsics get added on demand. Generally there has to be a good reason > to add them. llvm.sin was implemented (for

Misha Brukman wrote: > I don't know the current status of the LLVA project, so I will let the > current developers chime in. Please send all LLVM and LLVA questions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu . My apologies for the late reply. > > ----- Forwarded message from N O S P A M <ti_dak at yahoo.com> ----- > > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:47:32 -0800 (PST) > From: N O

Is the source code for llva available esp the linux kernel port. Is there a project page for llva ? Mike On 2/3/06, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Misha Brukman wrote: > > I don't know the current status of the LLVA project, so I will let the > > current developers chime in. Please send all LLVM and LLVA questions to > > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu .