similar to: Special handling of IAX circuit-busy vs busy

I call the firm from my portable at home (zoiper softphone). I have internal extension 60, and I call the internal SIP-client 10 at the firm via an IAX-connection over internet. My colleague at phone 10 answers my call. I ask him to transfer me with my colleague at extension 50. He then presses "transfer" on the grandstream GXP2020 (I get music) and dials the number 50. Phone 50

Hi, I am attempting to make about ten calls simultaneously and intermittently get 'SIP/voipprovider is circuit-busy' followed by 'everyone is busy/congested at this time" I am not sure if this is related to my bandwidth to my voip provider, a configuration issue or something else. Has anyone seen this before and have any suggestions. Thanks in advance. --------------

I'm in the process of testing a TLS/SRTP install. My experience is improving with each new challenge, but this one is a great test of my 2 month experience with Asterisk. When I dial 6003 from 6001, it takes 35 seconds until I get the error message that 6003 is circuit-busy. Any help would greatly be appreciated. Below is the error message and the extensions and sip.conf files. *CLI>

Hi, I want to know, if someone has tried to use clustering in asterisk to increase its scalability and make it distributed?? If yes, how easy it is to cluster? Can someone please ive me details about the same Thanks Varun __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Hello. I'm one of the maintainer of ices packages found at http://plf.zarb.org. I'm currently trying to rebuild the whole ice/icecast/libshout trilogy. However, i'm running into some troubles.

Hi all, I was just wondering if this is the intended behavior. Here is my setup: controller def index respond_to do |f| f.xml { render :xml => true } f.html { render :layout => :none } end end In my views I have a file for each type index.herb index.xerb The first request I send is cached and interferes with the other one. For example, if I send an xml request

Hi, We have the following shares listed in smb.conf users cannot access the samba share directly i.e. \\sambaserver\rixilr or \\sambaserver\bridges error messages '/ibe/dusty/RIXILE Share/Bridges' does not exist or permission denied when connecting to [bridges] Error was Permission denied Aug 21 10:09:12 dish sambaserver[27859]: [2015/08/21 10:09:12.964101, 0]

In the smb.conf I have escaped the path to a samba share in quotes. path = "/ibe/dusty/RIXILE Share/RIXILE" all the users needs to do is go to \\sambaserver\rixilr but get's the following error message does not exist or permission denied when connecting to [rixilr] Error was Permission denied Is this correct syntax? On 24/08/15 11:18, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 24/08/15

i recently setup a dhcp at my home and now i am getting these errors in my logs and was wondering if i set something up wrong? --------------------- dhcpd Begin ------------------------ Unknown Entries: Unable to add forward map from STEVEN-DELL.dusty.home to 192.168.1.100: timed out: 4 Time(s) Unable to add forward map from laptop.dusty.home to 192.168.1.104: timed out: 4

On 24/08/15 10:49, Sundeep Singh Nanuwa wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any issues using spaces in directories paths? > > On 21/08/15 11:06, Sunny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have the following shares listed in smb.conf >> >> users cannot access the samba share directly i.e. >> >> \\sambaserver\rixilr >> or >> \\sambaserver\bridges >>

I have release my routines for PRI circuit monitoring. You, your client or anyone can be notified by phone, beeper, email or txtmsg that your circuit is down. If Asterisk crashes due to an oscillating circuit (as I have found it sometimes does), sendmail is usually intact and email notification and txt messages will usually get through. If the client has backup lines, and Asterisk remains up,

Hi- Perhaps someone with an E100P in hand can answer this: I just received an E100P from Digium (I normally buy quad boards) I noticed that the circuit board says "T100P" on it, and I assume that the T100P and E100P both use the same circuit board. Can someone please confirm that their E100P says "T100P" on the artwork? Thanks Scott Scott M. Stingel Emerging Voice

Is there any way to disable short-circuit evaluation of expressions in Clang/LLVM? Let's say I have C code like the following: bool validX = get_group_id(0) > 32; int globalIndexY0 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 0 + 1; bool valid0 = validX && globalIndexY0 >= 4 && globalIndexY0 < 3910; int globalIndexY1 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) +

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 Summary: Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All URL: http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg- src/rsync/rsync.patch.lastmatch OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW

10.10.2011, 18:29, "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org>: > Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > >>  int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1; >>  bool valid2       = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910; >> >>  Clang, even at -O0, is performing

In function read_metadata_vorbiscomment_ from stream_decoder.c, at various locations where we short circuit the computation, we also set `obj->num_comments` accordingly. For example: https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=blob;f=src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c;h=e0f1b14d30dd548268a88e4341af3f38290816e3;hb=HEAD#l1736

As an updatee to my last post, things are still not working! The drivers did get added but I'm still not sure whether I achieved this via the Add Printer Wizard or despite error messages the rpcclient adddriver did work. I did wonder if the lsa_io_sec_qos: length c does not match size 8 error is because the printer name is too long, especially as when I tried a shorter name such as HP2300 -

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-02-25 10:05 ------- I considered the short-circuit operators (-! and +!) for filter commands, but I am not convinced of their utility. Do you have an example of a real-life situation that they improve? Note also that the suggested syntax for the new operators is now being used to specify

Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1; > bool valid2       = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910; > > Clang, even at -O0, is performing short-circuit evaluation of these > expressions, resulting in a fair number of branch instructions being >