similar to: Release Announcement: Updated CentOS 4 beta iso and DVD images for i386 and x86_64

To squelch the questions (related to the changing content on www.centos.org), I decided this needs to be published. The CentOS Team has been contacted by representatives of Red Hat's hired legal team regarding the use of Red Hat Trademarks on www.centos.org. (Full Email follows.) While the CentOS team feels we are using Red Hat's marks in a fair and legal manner, we have no choice

I''ve noticed some strangeness when using the InPlaceEditor. Here''s my code: <p id="storyTitle"><%= storyTitle %></p> <script type="text/javascript"> new Ajax.InPlaceEditor(''storyTitle'', ''editBlog.jsp'', { callback: function(value) { return ''v=edit&user=<%=

Anyone managed to get this working on CentOS 4? I'd love to hear how. .dn

while in firefox if i use arrow keys in text fields, it acts very oddly. starting at the beginning of the line it works fine for a few characters and then jumps to the end of the line. backarrow jumps backwards from the end of line to within a few chars of the beginning. anyone else seeing this?

All, The CentOS Project would like to invite you to come visit us at FOSDEM 2007. Here is an article with details about the 2 day event that is happening in Brussels, Belgium on 24 and 24 February 2007. http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=165 Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

i am having problems installing direct x i have followed the guide http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2334 the only problem is it doesnt work in steam it still says you need direct x 8.0 of greater i dont know if this is helpfull but it never tells me to reboot after direct x installation so i assume it is not installing properly i will hapily post any log files anyone

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-136.html refers updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/mailman-2.1.5-24.rhel3.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/mailman-2.1.5-24.rhel3.src.rpm To update CentOS 3.4 to this new version run 'yum update mailman' CentOS 3.3 shipped with an earlier version of mailman - mailman-2.0.13-5 - in the extras repo. This version has not been supported since 3.4 was

Hello, I would like to try CentOS on a PPC machine (a Pegasos http://www.pegasosppc.com ). http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=65 says, that a boot iso file can be downloaded, but I get a 404 error for http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.0beta/isos/ppc/ Could you please point me to the right URL? Thanks, bye, Peter

Hello, I originally sent it to centos at lists.centos.org, but it never seemd to reach the list. But sorry, if it's indeed a duplicate... Peter -------- Original Message ------- Hello, I would like to try CentOS on a PPC machine (a Pegasos http://www.pegasosppc.com ). http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=65 says, that a boot iso file can be downloaded, but I get a 404

I have a system with a PowerPC cpu which I'd like to run CentOS on in a production environment (albeit for a home personal server.) Does anyone know if the CentOS team are actually going to support PPC? I have found a page which states release 4 is in beta[1]. But little else. Is there lack of demand for support for this aging arch? Is there a lack of volunteers? I'd be willing to

What is everyone using for a firewall? I'm currently using www.astaro.com but their recent releases have soured me on ASL as a practical solution on my hardware (1.2MHz Athlon, 30G, and 256M). I only have 4 computers going through the firewall wall but it's consistently at 50% cpu load. There is very little network traffic (<10k bits per second on the wan connection, < 40k

Greetings Everyone, I finally got around to downloading and installing CentOS 3.1. Performed flawlessly :) Any of my whitebox friends still around here? I've been extremely busy with work as of late....I'm still considering getting involved with CentOS. -- Donavan Nelson donavan at whiteboxlinux.net http://whiteboxlinux.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The CentOS Team is pleased to announce the official release of CentOS 3.4 for x86_64 and EM64T. This release includes all RHEL 3 updates (for U4) and errata up to January 19th, 2005. New ISO images are available as well as an installable DVD edition. In addition this release is available via BitTorrent. Please visit the following page for complete

The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the availability of CentOS-4.3 in the following architectures: i386 - This distribution supports AMD (K6, K7, Thunderbird, Athlon, Athlon XP, Sempron), Pentium (Classic, Pro, II, III, 4, Celeron, M, Xeon), VIA (C3, Eden, Luke, C7) processors. x86_64 - This distribution supports AMD 64 (Athlon 64, Opteron) and Intel Pentium (Xeon EM64T)

On 23/06/18 21:03, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:58:21PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> * Is there a better page I can point at? > 'Better' is quite subjective; however this all goes back to > > https://web.archive.org/web/20060523223519/https://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=127 > > and is as good of a reference as any. >

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Due to the removal of caching-nameserver-7.3-3_EL3.noarch.rpm from the 3.4 i386, network installs (using boot.iso from within the os tree) will fail if the caching-nameserver package is included at package selection time. If you wish to use network installs and want to install caching-nameserver, first perform a network install excluding the

hi guys i just partially upgrade centos 3.4 to centos 4(using apt-get) and im having a problem removing kdb 1.08-10.2, kbd 1.12-2 is already installed and im trying to remove kdb 1.08 through apt-get and rpm -e here's what happened when i use apt-get: # apt-get remove kbd#1.08-10.2 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED:

Hi all, There are rumours flying around about a supposed vulnerability in OpenSSH. Two details which I've seen mentioned many times are (a) that this exploit was used to break into a RedHat system running OpenSSH 4.3 plus backported security patches, and (b) that "recent" versions of OpenSSH are not affected; but it's not clear if there is any basis for these rumours. Given

Hi Ralph, Whilst wearing you C-devel hat, will you please have a look at a recent forum thread [1] that has highlighted the ambiguity on the CentOS Product Specification web page [2]. I'm asking this here, as I guess that page really does come under documentation . . . and you are the documentation-meister. If it is not actually your area, please let me know who's cage bars I should