similar to: RE: Hardware dimensioning issues To: <juanmoyano@southecon.com.ar>

Hi all. What is the best hardware configuration to handle this following scenario? - 4 IVR menu with conference applications for each option; - Only SIP/g711 user access - 3500 simultaneous users(800 at the beginning) - No ZAP channels Where is the most important point of failure? CPU? Ethernet? RAM? Im planning to separate in three servers: Server01: 01 Xeon 3Ghz getting the 1st level of

Has any one used the Ipvolution tdm120 cards i am intrested to know how well it works and how well the on board dsp's work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050901/208c5541/attachment.htm

Our company, Signate, is going to be offering a three day introductory Asterisk training course, the first of a series. The first class will be in San Francisco the week of June 28. It will be a beta test to get the kinks out and we will not charge for the class or the materials. Anyone who attends is responsible for their own travel and lodging, if necessary. I doubt anyone reading the lsit

>From atacomm.... ________________________________ From: Jessee J Holmes [mailto:jholmes@atacomm.com] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:24 PM To: Wiley Siler Subject: Re: Got a date yet? No specific release date as of yet; but, we're hoping to have a physical date soon. So far planned release is either in June or July. Right now they developers are cleaning up the echo cancellation

Has anyone on this list gotten hold of these cards? It's been 2 months since their official ship date. Even the website www.ipvolution.com is in wee-wee land. /leo

But for us? _____ From: William Boehlke [mailto:william.boehlke@signate.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:24 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Second edition of my * book has been released $39.95 retail. _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com

Hey all, I know you all saw the topic and let out a groan. However, I understand how to get an overhead paging system to work with respect *, however I am now looking for a small(?) paging amp, that I could hook 3 or 4 horns to. I would like to just have the * extention be routed to a soundcard and out an output, so I would like an amp that is voice signal activated. Has anyone found anything

Hi I am setting up a phone system for a small office. The office will have 5-8 phones and a fax line. There are 4 hunt lines coming into the office. We have made no hardware purchase yet. Being an asterisk newbie, before I suscribed to this list I just assumed that I would buy voip phones and connect all the phones to a private ethernet network. However, I see many people inquiring about FXS

I don't think they are doing it with one Asterisk box. They did say "one rack of servers". Well, that might mean up to 50 computers if they are using blade servers. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of John Todd Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:21 PM To:

Thanks! So aside from the lack of redundancy, will it perform well and scale to utilize a full T1's worth of calls through to the legacy PBX? We would probably build a backup server from old equipment and rsync the configuration files. Thanks again! > -----Original Message----- > From: William Boehlke [mailto:william.boehlke@signate.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:33 PM >

Hi all, first post. My company's office in the UK is soon going to get a Cisco VoIP solution system. What I am interested in, and couldn't find googling, is if it is possible to connect an Asterisk solution to the Cisco system and have all the nice advantages of it (mainly calling the extensions and directly reach the other office). Thanks, have a nice day Simone

I'm trying to get a souped-up test machine(G5 Xserve) from Terrasoft to do some testing in a few weeks. If/when I actually get it I'll certainly post the results here. In theory the G5 should mop the floor with the Intel for high-volume Asterisk Zaptel usage, and I have heard from several Mac-heads that they have run three quad T1 digium cards on the Mac platform with no problems.

Why is using ulaw or alaw an unlikely scenario? I wouldn't use anything but ulaw\alaw. The Bells can compete on price and will if they have to. Where they CAN'T compete is quality. If there were something better than 711, I'd offer that. Well, there is 722, but not many things support it. ---- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original

Isn't it ridiculous that Hammer charges an arm and a leg for any work they do. For systems as large as that one, we just setup a seperate one, connect them back to back and run automated script to burn it in. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of William Boehlke Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006

It is amazing to me at this point that there is not an official Digium list of supported servers (including 1u models!). Clearly the number 1 issue with the Digium PRI cards is the server that they are used in. The new cards even go as far as listing server that DO NOT work on the Digium site! The wiki references are old and do not have any testing parameters. C'mon guys! Certify a

Hello, all. I'm tired of having to drive out to the colocation facility each time my dedicated asterisk server craps out, just to press the button to do a hard reboot. (I'm running 1.05 stable at present, no telephony hardware, as this is mainly a system that receives calls, no dial-out ability is needed.) I've been looking at the fancy xeon-based systems listed on ebay for a couple

We have asterisk running on a quad processor dell. The kernel has been compiled with SMP. However, asterisk seems to only use 1 processor. 3 of the 4 always stay at 100% idle. Is it pointless to have a multi-proc machine? I was going to buy a new dual 3.6Ghz Xeon server but if nothing will take advantage of the other proc... Perhaps my conception of multi-proc/threaded is warped. If asterisk is

There you go. "if it is doing no other work" is key phrase. A lot of PC can do that these days if all it has to do is re-route packets to different destinations, and guess what, if you make sure silence compression is turned on at the endpoints, you can claim even more streams can be passed through. The trict here is how * stores the mapping pair and how effiecent its lookup process is.

Hi, im trying to setup ASTCC but I'm getting it difficult. I've correctly set up the mysql database astcc and added a brand, trunk, route and a card as follows: brands +------+----------+------+--------------+------+--------+------+------+ | name | language | inc | publishednum | did | markup | days | fee | +------+----------+------+--------------+------+--------+------+------+ | FWD

hi any chance of making asterisk support these? http://voipstore.atacomm.com/shops/ViewItem.aspx/27934028032 -38356249088.htm roy