similar to: telextreme and *

Hi All, Does anyone know if there has been any developments in asterisk to use LineJacks to dial out (connect to the PSTN)? The card works perfectly with virtually anything else but asterisk. Maybe the CVS versions have some work on it? Cheers, -Z -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com

Hi All, I have the following scenario, it may already have been answered elsewhere, but I cant find the solution. I already have a PBX and would like to start implementing asterisk. I have ordered a 4 port card from the asterisk store (2 port FXS and 2 port FXO) and am waiting for it to arrive. I do not want to plug my incoming lines into my FXO ports yet as not all the desks have IP phones

Humm... should the list would be magic again? I have just intsalled, using the register, benchmark and downloared the correct codec to my asterisk installation, but I don't have the g729 command at my CLI... Any advice... Do I reboot? ;D

I'm lost in documentation. I setup a samba4 AD, and configured winbind so I can have local authentification using pam, I can now login to AD users v?a ssh. I want to achieve the Holy Gria of 1 source of users and password, for both, linux and windows machines, but I'm lost in documentation. So far I know: samba4 cann't use openldap as backend. samba4 ldap doesn't really is a full

I'm using a Te201p card, with unichan, I want to know if my channels are "ready" or in alarm... but uc show channel o uc show channels, doesn't show me anything... Any Ideas? thanks.

I have Asterisk CVS-HEAD-05/25/04-17:13:22, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium. Usign exclusively digium hardware. 3 TDM400P cards. 1 4xFXO 1 4xFXS 1 1xFX0 & 3xFXS When * is attending FXO calls, bridged to FXS calls, natively ofcourse, at a random time, the call hangus up. Also, for example, if a call is done, and an other extension hangup, there are some probability that the other extension

I tried this with no luck on the machine, seems the fax did not like even ulaw. Ended up just putting it inline, but of course, in a multi-line setup it could be a problem. Just a word of advice, get another line for it if you can. I fought for about a year with my pingtel ip phone over a wireless connection, now I got serious and got a normal line about 5 months ago. Much better off now...

which ir is the * channel? I have decleared 1 peer one in veracruz: [aullox_gdl] type=peer username=aullox_gdl host=200.67.99.127 and aat gdl I have: exten => 200,Dial(IAX/aullox_gdl@200.64.35.58/200@aullox) 200.64.35.58 is my ip 200 is tehe xtension and aull is the context and at veracruz i have: [aullox] exten => 200,1,Wait,2 exten => 200,2,Playback(transfer,skip) ;

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a astunicall-1.4 setup with a te110p to a nortel pbx in Mexico. (Hate R2!). This is what I get when trying to call to * box using testcall: ./testcall Chan 31, class 'mfcr2', variant 'mx,20,4', end 0, caller 0, from '' to '' Loading protocol mfcr2 Thread for channel 0 MFC/R2 Chan 31: Call control(9) MFC/R2

Surely there must be someone here who can help me with this problem. I have spent weeks trying to get this damned service to work with no luck. I have incoming calls working, but no outgoing. If get outgoing working then incoming don't work. I have sent this problem to this list a couple of times with little or no response, and I _really_ need some help to sort it out. I have an asterisk

I've tested both 6.3 and 7.0-RC2, amd64 architecture, and have found the occurrence of an interrupt storm using an ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (nForce 4) motherboard with an AMD Opteron 175. Relevant dmesg output: atapci0: <nVidia nForce CK804 UDMA133 controller> port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 6.0 on pci0 ata0: <ATA channel 0> on atapci0 ata1: <ATA

I see that there's now a 2.16.1 upgrade path for Cisco ATA-186 devices, dated (variously) July 11 or July 14 2003. Here are some interesting bugs that claim to be fixed. Most notable is CSCeb17953, at least from my perspective, as I've hit this bug before. CSCea42480 The Cisco ATA ignores the Require:100rel header and processes call. CSCea69889 The Cisco ATA builds a 302 Moved

I've got an Asus P5E3WSPro with 8 SATA ports and 8 disks attached. 6 disks are on one controller (and work perfectly) and 2 are on a second Marvell controller. FreeBSD sees the controller, but not the disks. If I move a working disk to the Marvell controller I can boot off it up to the stage of mounting root where it fails to see the disk. atacontrol shows: ATA channel 2: Master:

Steve, My Problem is not a problem, with the codec negotiation between end points. But when asterisk does it with canreinvite=no, * do not do it right. I replied with a lengthy discussion about my findings here, This behavior can be reproduced. But '*' do not seem to do the negotiation correctly. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-January/032197.html

Hi I know that this topic was on the list maybe dozen of times. But I have a question regarding the fax support in asterisk, because all the information I could get does not give me the clear view of if. I read that Asterisk 1.8 will have strong fax (t.38) support, but I want to know if these four scenarios will be possible to achieve: fax machine (phone+fax) connected to ATA --- SPA2102 ATA ---

hi, i have a host with a LSI SAS 3108 RAID controller in JBOD mode with 4 SSD SATA disks. i installed oVirt node (= CentOS 7) on the first two disks configured as SW RAID 1 (in the oVirt node/CentOS installer). when i look at the device names in the running OS i get # lsscsi --scsi_id -g [0:0:0:0] disk ATA SAMSUNG MZ7LM480 204Q /dev/sda - /dev/sg0 [0:0:1:0] disk ATA

For all thos Asterisk users not on the FWD list, it works for me!: -----Original Message----- From: Free World Dialup - The Future of Dialing [mailto:FWD@LISTSERV.PULVER.COM] On Behalf Of Leonidas Piagkos Sent: donderdag 12 juni 2003 0:58 To: FWD@LISTSERV.PULVER.COM Subject: Re: [FWD] FWD losing Registration Hi Don, All you have to do with your ATA is to set the following parameters as :

Hello, I've got a (P)ATA disk in a special frame. The disk itself supports UDMA-100 (and has an 80-ribbon cable), but the frame isn't compatible with that. By default, FreeBSD negotiates UDMA-100, and the console starts to fill with ICRC errors. In the past, I used a patch to ata-all.c that enabled the following entry in loader.conf to force the disk to UDMA-33, so it worked fine:

Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don''t start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c8t1d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1

Hello, I have been trying to get my coders to work without a conversion. I have read all the available asterisk documentation and support groups without any luck. Here is my issue. (Please feel free to ask questions if you do not understand what I am talking about.) I am using Cisco ATA-186 set to g729 codec. (But it will switch to g711 if sip-server request g711) I have 2 SIP-services to