similar to: fedora core 3 kernel source - couldsomeonethrowthe dog a bone!

What was the issue with zaptel and 2.6.12? ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Lee Archer Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:22 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] fedora core 3 kernel source - could someonethrowthe dog a bone! I

I found that only the kernel is installed. I'd avoid 2.6.12 for now as I had problem with the zaptel driver and stay with 2.6.9. Regards Lee ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep Sent: 24 August 2005 22:33 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] fedora

Ok, don't flame me, I know this is a question with an obvious answer to some, but I am not one of them. Installed FC3, but this time I decide to update since my ISOs are a bit old, so typical yum update Downloaded the FC3 SRPM for my kernel 2.6.12... Installed the SRPM package Ran rpmbuild -bp -target=i686 kernel-2.6.spec Tried to build zaptel - error; You do not

Has anyone had success with the AGI STREAM FILE command with the CVS? I can't get it to work with the debian 1.0.5 package or the CVS on Redhat or Debian. It's not syntax, I'm doing that right. It doesn't give me an error when I use AGI DEBUG, it doesn't even give a response, just goes right on to the next command. I put a "SAY NUMBER 123 #" before and after

Don't feal bad about not reading. I yell at my 10 y.o. about it all the time. READ, NO more TV, READ!!! > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Damon Estep > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:23 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >

Hello, here is a preliminary patch allowing rsync 2.5.6 to compile in BeOS (using the new BONE networking stack). Some explanations: - BeOS doesn't have chroot(), - the BONE networking stack export legacy network function for old apps in libnet.so (linked to by default), so it's necessary to force linking to the new libraries for things to work. I've yet to get inet_ntop() to be

Yeah the "variable stays there" because the channel is never up to be cleared. If you do something like exten => _X.,1,Wait(1) exten => _X.,2,Hangup You will see the same behavior. Can you confirm?? I am running CVS from about a week ago... Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Damon Estep > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:48 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] dialing 2 channels at the > sametimewithdifferentcaller ID number? > >

What is CFU and CFNR? > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Michel Koenen > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:46 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to use * and # as part of > numberindialcommand > > > From: "Damon

I se what you are talking about I an able to reproduce!!! However your PRI may be in a Round-Robin picking order, that would cycle through all of the channels until it reaches an end and then it repeats. I set our PRI to first available hunting instead of RR and it will use the same channel over and over again regardless if the call exists. If anything it's a feature!!! Unassigned DID will

I tried that, you have to ANSWER before you can clear it, which is not a good idea... > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:27 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:09 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] dialing 2 channels > atthesametimewithdifferentcaller ID number? > > > >

But it does indicated that a variable is staying assigned that should not be, which could have other impact over time??? The behavior is very different for c call where there is a dialplan match for the dialed number, when the call completes the channel extension variable is cleared. If you do not mind please ad a bug note that you experienced the same thing! The bug marshals think I am nuts.

In the real world (or at least in my world) we use undersubscribed internet connections that come with a service level agreement (SLA) that guarantees that the jitter, delay, and packet loss with be within defined parameters in the service agreement. With most DSL and Cable you will not get a SLA, with the cheapest T1s you might get one, but the only penalty to the ISP if they do not meet is a

Whilst configuring another shorewall firewall router for another site, I must have made some totally newbie error.... While directly on the cable modem, it works great. But when placed on the LAN side of my existing Shorewall box, the NEW shorwall box could not ping, or look up dns or anything else. If I shutdown shorewall (clear) in the NEW box then it could surf the net and ping etc. When

Michel Send me the same output for a dial string that only sends the *31* Is this an ISDN line? What type of card/signalling/switchtype are you using? It looks as if the PSTN switch accepts the *31* and then hangs up so you can make the NEXT call with the *31* feature enabled. If so I assume the *31* feature will be enabled for the next call on the ENTIRE SPAN if it is an ISDN trunk group. If

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:20 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] dialing 2 channels at the same > timewithdifferentcaller ID number? > > >Exten

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:41 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-Announce] Asterisk 1.2.4 and > Zaptel1.2.3 > > Damon Estep

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:41 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: [Asterisk-Announce] Asterisk 1.2.4 and > Zaptel1.2.3 > > Damon Estep

Hi, I too have found this matching to be frustrating. I would like it to behave as you describe. Doug -- Doug Meredith 506-854-7997 ext. 801 ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Damon Estep Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:50 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial