Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Sudenly unable to get incoming from"
2005 Aug 19
2
Sudenly unable to get incoming from Broadvoice
So it was all working well and then suddenly I'm unable to get incoming
calls from BV. Outgoing is fine. I'm using AAH.
I have the following settings;
register=9738281625@sip.broadvoice.com:PASSWORD-GOES-HERE:9738281625@sip.broadvoice.com/2208
[broadvoice]
username=9738281625
user=phone
type=peer
secret=PASSWORD-GOES-HERE
qualify=1000
port=5060
nat=yes
insecure=very
2005 Jan 18
1
aDSL on ppp0 and dialin ppp
Hi all ....
I Have installed Bering LRP on Many sites and I am very pleased with the
capabilites of shorewall.
Howerver I came across a prob that I am unaware ot its solution.
Using shorewall 2.0.2f
Kernel 2.4.24
On one Site LRP box serves internet outgoing connections through ( static
IP ) a DSL line AND an
incoming dial-in PPP conection.
My shorewall configuration Is based upon the fact
2010 Oct 15
1
Help with R
Dear Sir/Madam;
I'm not sure whether this is the correct contact for help.
I've been recently working with R on my project, unfortunately It sudenly crashes!
It gives me the following message:
"FATAL ERROR: unable to restore saved data in .RDATA"
I decided to uninstall the copy (a R2.11.0) and installed a new version (2.11.1) but I'm still receiving the same message. When I
2009 Aug 21
0
winbind error..or else
HI,
After a quite long period wehere samba was wroking well, sudenly, with
an apparently good reason started do not work. This mean the user are
not able to connect to server, to samba shares.
this is something i could find in logs.
I google it for something like:
[2009/08/21 13:59:16, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(790)
rpc_api_pipe: Remote machine DC01.mydomain pipe \NETLOGON fnum
2011 Mar 03
0
About wine
Hallo guys,now I'm start learning about wines, and sudenly go on one verry nicely web site about italian wines. You can too go and learn in this site www.restofood.com
2016 Feb 18
0
Problems after migration from samba 3.5.2 to samba 4.3.1
The dublicated uid numbers where too a problem fo me on updating to samba 4.3.4 (groups and sudenly machines have uids the same).
As mentioned you have to sort them out and change them.
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
2005 Dec 13
0
non-threaded Ogg/Vorbis/Theora player implementation (java)
I develop j2me applications for mobile phones and for fun I tried to port
Cortados java player to j2me. Took the source code changed a couple of lines
to make it a MIDLET and sudenly, without even thinking it would work, I ended
with a pure j2me theora player for my mobile phone.
Of course is for very small clips (128x96 @ 10.000 fps ) and no audio.
So now I want to implement a full j2me
2022 Dec 30
1
CentOS Stream 8 sssd.service failing part of sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 baseos package
On 12/27/22 22:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2022-12-25 07:44, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>> A recent update of the sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 package is
>> causing sssd.service systemctl failures all over my CentosOS machines.
> ...
>> [sssd] [confdb_expand_app_domains] (0x0010): No domains configured,
>> fatal error!
>
>
> Were you previously using
2023 Jan 03
1
CentOS Stream 8 sssd.service failing part of sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 baseos package
> On 1/3/23 05:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 12/30/22 04:06, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>> On 12/27/22 22:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>>> On 2022-12-25 07:44, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>>>> A recent update of the sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 package is
>>>>> causing sssd.service systemctl failures all over my CentosOS
>>>>>
2023 Jan 13
1
CentOS Stream 8 sssd.service failing part of sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 baseos package
On 12/30/22 04:06, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> On 12/27/22 22:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 2022-12-25 07:44, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>> A recent update of the sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 package is
>>> causing sssd.service systemctl failures all over my CentosOS machines.
>> ...
>>> [sssd] [confdb_expand_app_domains] (0x0010): No domains configured,
2015 Aug 14
2
chan_sip.c: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission
Hello friends:
I am facing cutoffs randomly when negotiating calls.
The PBX dials the destination, the provider (softswitch) receives the
request *[1]* and sudenly the PBX hangs up the call* [2]* while the
provider is still dialing it, as a consequence the remote peer receives a
ghost call. Along the atempt I could see six times a messages regarding NAT
isuues *[3]*
I hope anyone can give me an
2023 Jan 09
1
CentOS Stream 8 sssd.service failing part of sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 baseos package
On 1/3/23 13:41, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On 1/3/23 05:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 12/30/22 04:06, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/22 22:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>>>> On 2022-12-25 07:44, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>>>>> A recent update of the sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 package is
>>>>>> causing sssd.service
2023 Jan 09
1
CentOS Stream 8 sssd.service failing part of sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 baseos package
> On 1/3/23 13:41, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> On 1/3/23 05:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>> On 12/30/22 04:06, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>>>> On 12/27/22 22:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>>>>> On 2022-12-25 07:44, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>>>>>>> A recent update of the sssd-common-2.8.1-1.el8.x86_64 package is
2005 Aug 12
6
FXO port trhoug optimum voice VOIP service
Hello,
I have asterisk running on Fedora Core 3 with a x100p
(oem). After some time I got asterisk with some soft
extensions working (u gotta love open source), but I'm
stuck with outbound dialing. This is the diagnose:
- detect 1 wcfxo channel.
- when trying to make an outside call I get unable to
create channel of type Zap. Everyone is busy/congested
at this time
- When I plug the x100p
2020 Oct 29
0
Suden "ast_db_put: Couldn't execute statment" in 13.14.1 after high rate of incoming REGISTERs
Hello,
The other day, a 13.14.1 server suddenly stopped working correctly.
First, it printed:
Oct 23 21:53:40 FOOBAR asterisk[2377]: WARNING[27942]: db.c:332 in
ast_db_put: Couldn't execute statment: SQL logic error or missing database
This occurred while this server received a lot incoming REGISTER such as:
Oct 23 21:53:40 FOOBAR asterisk[2377]: [Oct 23 21:53:40]
2006 Jan 23
0
Firewall/Embeded System/CF/etc
Manny,
You really need to try Astlinux. See www.astlinux.org. It does pretty
much what you desire.
Also see my recent article about Aslinux embedded on a Soekris Net4801
(http://www.tomsnetworking.com/Sections-article153.php)
Michael Graves
Sr Product Specialist
Pixel Power Inc
mgraves@pixelpower.com
o(713) 861-4005
o(800) 905-6412
f(713) 864-8668
c(713) 201-1262
> -------- Original
2012 Feb 01
3
Router that support Asterisk
Hi All;
I heard from some friends that there are a dsl router that has Linux OS and it has asterisk on it, so the ip phone can register on this router, also if the router has FXS or FXO ports then it can be used to place calls through them.
Is it really? Where I can these routers? Did anyone try it to tell us if it is stable and working fine?
Regards
Bilal
-------------- next part
2016 Feb 17
2
Problems after migration from samba 3.5.2 to samba 4.3.1
On 17/02/16 20:14, Fernando Favero wrote:
> And, there is any problem if I change the uidNumber manually via ldbmodify
> ??
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
>
>> On 17/02/16 19:53, Fernando Favero wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
>>>
2006 May 22
1
Asterisk on Proxy
Good Day All
I recently implemnetd asterisk outside our LAN (external network).It works well in a NAT settings.
But on external network with PROXY setting ASTERISK DID NOT WORK.
My question are
1 Can ASTERISK work in a PROXY setting .
2 If it can work how can i implement it .
Expecting your reply
Thanks
Paul
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger
2016 Feb 12
2
sudden change GID number on DC
Hai,
I just noticed something strange with my group GID assignments.
This happens on my DC.
I have my “Domain Admins” “Domain Users” etc given a GID.
(im using ad backend )
Running
getent group "domain admins" gives back.
domain admins:x:3000008:administrator,admin
But this is fault.. that GID should be 10001
Anyone noticed this also ?
After