similar to: Disconnect supervision question

> > > > I would be grateful if anybody could tell me what I should > > tell Verizon > > in NJ so they would enable "disconnect supervision" for my lines. > > > > Apparently "remote hangup notification" or "disconnect > supervision" or > > "calling party control" is NOT the magic phrase for them. Although >

Hey all, anyone know the status of disconnect supervision on POTS lines in India? Set up an asterisk box, TDM cards, in Mumbai, and doesn't seem to have disconnect supervision...... Thanks -- Chris Earle System Solutions Specialist

I'm starting to shop for my first channel bank and one of the features that eveyone seems to recommend is "far end disconnect supervision". What other terms do various manufactures use to describe this same feature ? Is "calling party disconnect" the same as "far end disconnect supervision" ? Thanks

Hi all I'm using sangoma a200 cards in the UK and have the ongoing, often noted problem of disconnect supervision with BT POTS lines. Just noticed this post on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/UK+Asterisk+Details stating that potentially someone's got a solution : "TDM400P & Not Detecting Hangups: Got a TDM400P installed and having problems with Asterisk not detecting

Ok so this is officially driving me crazy. I have an Asterisk 1.6.1.6 install with DAHDI/DAHDI tools (latest) and an OpenVOX TDM400 card with 1 FXO port and 1 FXS port. I have a POTS line from my phone company attached to the POTS line. I have asked for "disconnect supervision" to be provisioned on my line and they claim to have added it. However, my scenario is as follows: I receive a

Does anyone have disconnect supervision working on their TDM400P or X101P cards (to/from the telco)? Googling "telco disconnect supervision," I found the following description: http://mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/telecom-archives/TELECOM_Digest_Online/1559.html [cut] Re: How Do I Get "Kewlstart" From my Phone Company? Paul A Lee Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:58:16 -0400 ... It

I have an Audiocodes MP-118FXO in production. When an outbound call is made and the remote party hangs up, the Audiocodes hangs up the call immediately. But if an incoming call is received and the remote party hangs up, the Audiocodes does not hang up immediately. I have tinkered with Current Disconnect and Polarity Reversal settings, to no avail. Anyone experienced this issue with Audiocodes or

The FXO lines on my TDM400 are connected to PSTN lines in Israel. As far as I know, the lines around here have disconnect supervision (I've seen some other Israelis on this list, anyone know for sure?), because it's worked on Dialogic cards, which reported hangup, not busy detect (while when I connect a Dialogic card to a PBX, I have to measure the busy signal's frequency/cadence or

Can anyone help me with the term that SBC uses to refer to disconnect supervision? I have an Adit 600 channel bank which has helped improve the disconnect detection time down to about 8 seconds. This is still causing some issues in particular with call progress enabled in * we are having a few disconnects while calls are in session (about 2 reported in first 5 days of use). I have talked both to

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005

Can anyone help me with the term that SBC uses to refer to disconnect supervision? I have an Adit 600 channel bank which has helped improve the disconnect detection time down to about 8 seconds. This is still causing some issues in particular with call progress on we are having a few disconnects while calls are in session. I have talked both to some local phone contractors and SBC directly and

Hi I know this gets covered fairly regularly, but I've had a search through the archives and can't find anything dealing with this specifically - apologies if I've missed it though. I've got a TDM11B with the fxo port plugged into a standard UK BT PSTN line, loading wcfxs with OPERMODE=UK. All's working well, except if I get an incoming call through my bt line, and the

Hi, folks! Sangoma has an informal user survey up on their home page (at http://www.sangoma.com) asking if people would use their A500 card for North American BRI, if it were supported. I encourage anyone with an interest in voice BRI in North America to vote; this information will be used for deciding whether to make the investment in developing a National ISDN driver layer for it. Benefits to

Hi , Thanks danny nicholas. Finally we get the things done with following. If i specify busypatten=500,500 then asterisk does not recognize hang up signal. After removing it only all are working fine. I choosed 2nd option as per your suggestions. working chan-dahdi.conf: ==================== signalling = fxs_ks busycount = 3 busydetect = yes callprogress = yes progzone=in usecallerid=yes

Hi, I am using TDM400 card with 3 fxs and 1 fxo. I am struggling to detect hangup tone or disconnect supervision tone from my CO. I attached the recorded wav file which contains my telco's disconnect supervision. I am using , asterisk-1.4.33.1 dahdi-linux-complete-2.3.0.1+ 2.3.0 OS => Debian-lenny 5 users.conf ------------- [trunk_1] trunkname = pstn ; GUI

After reading through several recent threads, I started to wonder why the Cisco document (and other VoIP documents) appears to present this issue as VoIP gateway specific. Don't (plain old) PBX' face the same issue if they use analogue interfaces? If there are analogue PBX' at all, how do they solve the problem? Yuan Liu

Thanks to everyone that responded to my channel bank question. Ive decided that the Adit 600 would be a good choice. Then I got to thinking about SIP phones and wondered if their quality has progressed to the point that they can be deployed to customers who "just want their phones to work" and wouldn't tolerate any SIP hickups. As for pricing, I would think the SIP phones would

I'm using gentoo 2004.3, and when I emerge the zaptel driver, compile fails with the following output: CC [M] /var/tmp/portage/zaptel-0.9.1/work/zaptel-0.9.1/ztd-eth.o In file included from /var/tmp/portage/zaptel-0.9.1/work/zaptel-0.9.1/ztd-eth.c:40: /var/tmp/portage/zaptel-0.9.1/work/zaptel-0.9.1/zaptel.h:55:2: warning: #warning "Zaptel doesn't support DEVFS in post 2.4

Hello, I'm trying to run mailfront SMTP (http://untroubled.org/mailfront/) under Dovecot 2.x process/service supervision My intention was to utilize the fact that dovecot2.x seems to have some kind of generic process/service supervision as well as builtin ssl support. But I cannot get the most simple generic service setup (without ssl) to work. Currently running dovecot 2.0.11 on FreeBSD

I have an older Newbridge Mainstreet 3624 upon which I'm terminating some analog DID lines. They are effectively loop-start trunks with battery supplied by me (ie. FXO) and consumed by the serving central office. One major part of DID is the requirement for providing Answer Supervision in the form of battery polarity reversal on the analog trunks. Without it wierd things start happening, like