similar to: Lock Extension

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:10 AM, <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:08 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > In the same way that the core LLVM libraries have support routines for > DWARF, I think that both mangling and demangling should be provided as well. > > > How would LLVM provide support for mangling? And what tools

Dear All, I have a set of environental maps and presence-only points for some species. How can I generate distributions models on R using these presence-only data? What packages and functions can I use to do so? Kind regards, Miltinho Brazil [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

We encountered a problem with respect to KVM virtual host restore and NTP. Specifically, our VM test host was shutdown by an extended power outage and when power returned all of the restored guests were immediately shutdown by ntp because the time differential between the restored systems and that of the ntpd sync servers exceeded the panic threshold. This is not an acceptable situation so in the

Hello, I'm using pscl to run a hurdle model. Everything works great until I get to the point of making predictions. All of my "count" predictions are lower than my actual data, and lower than the "response" predictions, similar to the issue described here ( https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2012-August/320426.html) and here (

Very friggen cool, that you very much for the information it looks like it will do the job nicely. What did you use in your extensions list to activate the relay? James > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jay Milk > Sent: Sunday, 20 February 2005 6:24 PM > To: 'Asterisk

On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:08 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > In the same way that the core LLVM libraries have support routines for DWARF, I think that both mangling and demangling should be provided as well. How would LLVM provide support for mangling? And what tools actually need it? I also wonder if we need more from a demangler than just a string. I know linker

LLVM 2.7's ScalarEvolution.cpp has this scary comment: // It's tempting to handle inttoptr and ptrtoint as no-ops, however this can // lead to pointer expressions which cannot safely be expanded to GEPs, // because ScalarEvolution doesn't respect the GEP aliasing rules when // simplifying integer expressions. I think I understand what the comment is saying. If a GEP has

On Sep 9, 2010, at 1:48 PM, David Greene wrote: > LLVM 2.7's ScalarEvolution.cpp has this scary comment: > > // It's tempting to handle inttoptr and ptrtoint as no-ops, however this can > // lead to pointer expressions which cannot safely be expanded to GEPs, > // because ScalarEvolution doesn't respect the GEP aliasing rules when > // simplifying integer

Good morning all, I'm setting up Asterisk for the first time with no prior PBX experience. I'm following Andy Powell's 'Getting Started with Asterisk' (http://www.automated.it/guidetoasterisk.htm). This is my second time through that document - as I did something weird the first time and really upset it somehow - and I wanted to ask a few general questions of the list.

Dear all, I have strong interest on Ecological Niche Model, which in general use a set of environmental variables (continuous, categorical etc) and Presence (or Presense/Absence) records for species. I think that "grasp" and "adehabitat" packages could help me on these tasks. My input layers are on ASC format, and the record of species is a data-frame with X, Y, name of

Hello Matthijs, On May 9, 2008, at 3:47 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi All, > > the attached patch performs the splitting in the proposed manner. > before applying the patch, please execute > svn cp lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnroll.cpp lib/Transforms/Utils/ > UnrollLoop.cpp > to make the patch apply and preserve proper history. > > Transforms/Utils/UnrollLoop.cpp

Hi, My pass heavily relies on llvm::Loop's getSmallConstantTripCount method. However, I found that it doesn't work for some simple cases. In the following example, I can get the constant trip count of the outermost loop if statement "a[l] = a[l] + 1" is there. After commenting out this line, the returned constant trip count for that loop is 0. In my pass, I traverse the nested

Thanks a lot for your guys' help!!! I guess once I am able to get *V* (which probably is a pointer to a Value object), then, I can instrument some code at the IR level to dump V. As long as I maintain V at this pass stage, I should be able to dump the loop trip count. This is true, isn't it? Basically, what I am going to do is to add a function call before the loop body, such as:

As you changed the return value of `temp_get()` to solely be the error code, or absence of an error, I would change all those tests that checked whether the returned value was strictly less, or greater than, 0 to now only compare against 0 (no error). For example, if (therm && therm->attr_get && nvkm_therm_temp_get(therm, &val) < 0) if

Thanks for the explanation. But I am a little confused with the following fact. Can't LLVM keep vectorizable_elements as a symbolic value and convert the loop to say; for(unsigned i = 0; i < vectorizable_elements ; i += 2){ //main loop } for(unsigned i=0 ; i < vectorizable_elements % 2; i++){ //fix up } Why does it have to reason about the range of vectorizable_elements? Even

I vote for the consistent, complete log format as a solution to this sort of thing, and those who need to take non-rsync related actions based on what rsync did can write their own applications to do so. People keep coming up with some particular thing they need done for their own application, and want rsync to do that too. rsync is a tool to make one thing exactly like another. It is not

Dear Jim and Henrique, thank you both for your help. I have done this but run into another problem: ? In the example?below "loc1,loc2" occurs in the (now correct, thanks to your advice) "list" twice. ? ? trips=("loc1,loc2","loc2,loc3") ? DF$listoftrips=("loc1,loc2", "loc1,loc3", "loc2,loc3","loc1,loc2"). ? I?am

Hi Nadav, Thanks for the response. I forgot to mention that there is an upper limit of 16 for the Trip Count check, TinyTripCountVectorThreshold = 16; if (TC > 0u && TC < TinyTripCountVectorThreshold). So right now, any loop with Trip Count as 0, or with value >=16, LV with unroll. With the change to the lower bound, it will also include the loop with 0 trip count. SCEV returns 0

Hi, Being in the process of translating some of my SAS programs to R, I encountered one difficulty. I have a solution, but it is not elegant (and not pleasant to implement). I have a large dataset with many variables needed to identify the origin of a sample, many to describe sample characteristics, others to describe site characteristics. I want only a (shorter) list of sites and their

> On Sep 16, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Mehdi, > > Mehdi Amini wrote: > > > >> On Sep 16, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Kevin Choi via llvm-dev > >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > >> > >> > int mat[9][9][9]; > >> > for (p =