similar to: Firewall will definatelyincreasejitters inyourvoice conversation

Typically a "hardware" firewall is specialized and uses ASICs. Because the solution utilizes specialized chips tailored to the task, this is considered a hardware based solution. Of course software is involved but it too is specialized and is even proprietary in nature. A "software" firewall, be it BlackICE or even a Linux on PC uses no specialized hardware. Thus the

Wiley is definitely right. It would be dangerous not to have a firewall for security reasons. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Wiley Siler Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Firewall will definately

Hi; I am in the process of planning a PBX/Voice mail system for a business with an ISDN phone system and somewhere on the order of 12 internal phones. The ISDN system appears to be a Primary Rate Interface, though this may be irrelevent because receptionists answer all inbound telephone calls before possibly transferring via the PBX, and most calls do not get transferred. Telephone use

Hi; Before I tell a customer that this would require custom development I figured I would ask here. Does Asterisk support pager notification of new voicemails out of the box? Or do I need an AGI script to do that? Also, if I want to call a number from an automated program in Asterisk and get the DTMF tones entered by the user on the other side, is there an easy way to do this? Best

Hi, If you will put firewall, then i think you will get high latency and consequently you will hear voice jitter in your conversation. so avoid putting firewall. Regards Lokesh Portugal mail lokeshkumar80@yahoo.co.in ____________________________________________________ Send a rakhi to your brother, buy gifts and win attractive prizes. Log on to

Absolutely. Lokesh, I suggest you go to the Wiki and check out the security issues inherint in the implementation of SIP in Asterisk. http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20security http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+security+dialplan -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On

Hi all; I have been searching for an answer to a question that a customer asked me and I have only found a few older answers. So, wanting to find out if anyone has any experience with this issue and can help provide me with some advice. I have a customer which is strongly interested in using Asterisk as a PBX. One of the core requirements, however, is that the system MUST be able to

Hi, Long story short I've got a fully functional Dovecot IMAP instance and I am now looking to upgrade some perimiter authenticated SMTP relays to authenticate against the Dovecot instance. Trouble is that I am seeing errors such as "auth: Warning: sql: Ignoring changed user_query in /etc/dovecot/local_sql_users.conf, because userdb sql not used." in my Postfix server logs and not

Hi Travers, Just an additional remarks to Michael's answer, if your S4 class inherits from R's basic types, say integer, the resulting object will be an INTSXP. If your S4 class does not inherit from any class, it will be an S4SXP. You can think about this question from the object-oriented framework: If one class inherits the integer class, what should R do to make all the integer related

I think it's worth saying that mclapply() works as documented: it relies on forking, and so doesn't work well in environments where it's unsafe to fork. This is spelled out explicitly in the documentation of ?mclapply: It is strongly discouraged to use these functions in GUI or embedded environments, because it leads to several processes sharing the same GUI which will likely cause

Travers, Great to hear you're trying out the ALTREP stuff, good on you :). Did you mean the get_altstring_Elt_method? I see the code in size.c within utils that grabs each element, but I don't see any setting (and the setters are noops currently anyway they just do things the old way). One thing we have to decide is what object.size means for an altrep. I tend to think it should mean

I'm trying to understand the R internals a bit better and reading over the documentation. I see that there is a bit related to whether an object is S4 (S4_OBJECT_MASK), and also the object type S4SXP (25). The documentation makes clear that these two things aren't the same. But in practice, will the S4-bit and object type ever disagree for S4 objects? I know that one can set the bit

On Sat, 11 May 2024, Travers Ching wrote: > The following code snippet causes R to hang. This example might be a > bit contrived as I was experimenting and trying to understand > promises, but uses only base R. > > It looks like it is looking for "not_a_variable" recursively but since > it doesn't exist it goes on indefinitely. > > x0 <- new.env() > x1

On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 9:34?AM luke-tierney--- via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 11 May 2024, Travers Ching wrote: > > > The following code snippet causes R to hang. This example might be a > > bit contrived as I was experimenting and trying to understand > > promises, but uses only base R. > > This has nothing to do with promises.

Hi Inaki, > "Performant"... in terms of what. If the cost of copying the data > predominates over the computation time, maybe you didn't need > parallelization in the first place. Performant in terms of speed. There's no copying in that example using `mclapply` and so it is significantly faster than other alternatives. It is a very simple and contrived example, but

Just throwing my two cents in: I think removing/deprecating fork would be a bad idea for two reasons: 1) There are no performant alternatives 2) Removing fork would break existing workflows Even if replaced with something using the same interface (e.g., a function that automatically detects variables to export as in the amazing `future` package), the lack of copy-on-write functionality would

Hello, I am afraid if I post in an inaproprate forrum. I am novice in the traffic control TC with Linux. I have a R&D project and i should to apply a lot of QoS mecanisms in a wireless environement! I have an access point witch is rely to a PC and three laptops. The PC play a role of a controleur. All traffic must travers throw it. I have configure the AP to only play a role of a forwarder.

My application runs fine. I just want to change a few routing rules and I decided to test using script/console. But I''m getting following error. Loading development environment. >> rs = ActionController::Routing::Routes >> rs.recognize_path "/home/index" TypeError: can''t convert Fixnum into String from

I'm sure you guys are extremely busy but can you answer a couple questions for me? Does Wine support the access XP runtime? Our accounting package uses a microsoft access front end for a SQL Server Database and I would like it work on a linux workstation. Right now we just have the runtime installed on all our Windows XP workstation so they don't have to have the full blown access app on

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 03:13:03PM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > Maybe I am not clear enough. > > > > > > I mean if we inflate balloon before live migration, for a 8GB guest, it takes > > about 5 Seconds for the inflating operation to finish. > > > > And these 5 seconds are spent where? > > > > The time is spent on allocating the pages