similar to: Cisco 7920 boot causes 7940 to release DHCP lease

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Cisco 7920 boot causes 7940 to release DHCP lease"

2005 Jul 25
2
cisco 7920 makes 7940 reboot
I have asterisk 1.09 running with chan_sccp.20050701 on Fedora core 4 with kernel 2.6.12. I have a Cisco 7940 working with X-lite working on XP too, connecting to each other, Asterisk and FWD. The 7940 upgraded to SIP7.4 with xmlDefault.cnf.XML getting delivered via tftp using the loadInformation8 parameter method taken from voip-info.org ("Configuring Cisco 79xx phones with Asterisk"
2004 Aug 25
1
7960 Looses DHCP Lease when 7920 boots!?
I finally have my 7920 working though I'm seeing this bizarre behavior. As soon as the 7920 boots and authenticates with the AP my 7960 release's its ip. Aug 24 15:52:37 babel dhcpd: DHCPRELEASE of 192.168.30.133 from 00:07:eb:26:e3:22 (SIP0007EB26E322) via eth0 (found) Aug 24 15:52:37 babel dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:0d:28:2e:95:f0 via eth0 Aug 24 15:52:37 babel dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on
2004 Jan 13
4
Again: 7920 Cisco IP Phone Skinny & SIP
hi! i had some good news regarding the cisco 7920 and the internetworking with asterisk (and possibly SIP ?). Status: chan_sccp.so not coredumping anymore :-) Phone contantly in reboot loop [see below] :-( Reboot Loop means: ------------------ Phone auth's with AP Phone gets IP from DHCP & TFTP Server Phone loads OS7920.TXT Phone loads SEP<macaddr>.CNF.XML Phone loads
2004 Jan 11
1
More Success on the Cisco 7920 and SCCP !!!!!
Hi All, have some decent success on the 7920 "activation" in Asterisk. Latest status: chan_skinny does NOT work with 7920 chan_sccp does WORK with 7920 (!!) however: to remove coredumping the chan_sccp just comment out the MWI (messagewaitingindicator), then it compiles fine. Then change sccp_helper.c: return "P0060302" instead of the old value. and voila: Phone is
2018 Mar 29
1
dhcp lease time hardware in script at dhcpd/Bind/Samba wiki page
Hi Rowland, > You could try adding something like this near to the top of > dhcp-dyndns.sh: > > TTL=$(cat /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf | grep 'max-lease-time' | awk -F ';' > '{print $1}' | awk '{print $NF}') > > Then replace the '3600' with '$TTL' Users like comments in their config files. Your script: cat /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf |
2016 Jul 06
2
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
Hi, I m looking for the max value for max-lease-time. would 512640 seconds (1 year) work? Thanks . G?tz
2018 Mar 29
0
dhcp lease time hardware in script at dhcpd/Bind/Samba wiki page
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:01:26 +0100 Sebastian Arcus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > There seems to be a slight issue with the instructions at the > following wiki page: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > The /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh script seems to use a hardwired > value for the lease expiry time
2012 Jan 05
1
dhcp lease-time
Why is the default lease-time set to only 10 minutes (600 seconds) in /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf (CentOS-6.2) as distributed? Why is not set to a much longer time? Is there any disadvantage in doing that? Or conversely, is a short lease-time safer in some way? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College
2016 Jul 07
1
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
Am 06.07.16 um 18:19 schrieb John R Pierce: > On 7/6/2016 1:27 AM, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> :) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to >> configure static, just plug in and run. > > why not configure reservations for those access points? > > the downside of a really long lease time is if you have to change > something like
2004 Sep 13
1
IAXy DHCP lease not renewing
Hi, I have an IAXy which *appears* not to renew it's DHCP lease. The DHCP server is a Solaris box running the native Solaris DHCP server. Is there any known DHCP issues I should be aware of? Is there anyway to get the IAXy to log it's DHCP activity? Thanks, Glenn
2016 Jul 06
0
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
How about static ip mapping on dhcp? Eero 2016-07-06 11:27 GMT+03:00 G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>: > :) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to > configure static, just plug in and run. > > /G?tz > > Am 06.07.16 um 10:24 schrieb Eero Volotinen: > > DHCP uses FFFFFFFF16 to represent an infinite
2016 Jul 06
0
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
On 7/6/2016 1:27 AM, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: > :) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to > configure static, just plug in and run. why not configure reservations for those access points? the downside of a really long lease time is if you have to change something like DNS, gateway, whatever, the clients with a really long lease will not
2016 Jul 07
0
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
Static MAC ip mapping on dhcp server? Eero 7.7.2016 12.38 ip. "G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator" < goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> kirjoitti: Am 06.07.16 um 18:19 schrieb John R Pierce: > On 7/6/2016 1:27 AM, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> :) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to >> configure static, just plug in and run.
2016 Jul 07
1
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
Thanks, I did know that and we are using this in other situations. But as written in my third reply: To much work every MAC I dont have to type counts. Regards . G?tz Am 07.07.16 um 11:44 schrieb Eero Volotinen: > Static MAC ip mapping on dhcp server? > > Eero > 7.7.2016 12.38 ip. "G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator" < > goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
2016 Jul 06
0
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
DHCP uses FFFFFFFF16 to represent an infinite lease. Try if it's supported. Anyway, it's insane value as year lease time :) Eero 2016-07-06 11:22 GMT+03:00 G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>: > Hi, > > I m looking for the max value for max-lease-time. would 512640 seconds > (1 year) work? > > Thanks . G?tz > > > >
2018 Mar 29
0
dhcp lease time hardware in script at dhcpd/Bind/Samba wiki page
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:24:32 +0100 Sebastian Arcus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 29/03/18 15:52, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > You could try adding something like this near to the top of > > dhcp-dyndns.sh: > > > > TTL=$(cat /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf | grep 'max-lease-time' | awk -F ';' > > '{print $1}'
2016 Jul 06
6
DHCP max-lease-time maximum
:) ... the long lease is for some Accesspoints which we dont like to configure static, just plug in and run. /G?tz Am 06.07.16 um 10:24 schrieb Eero Volotinen: > DHCP uses FFFFFFFF16 to represent an infinite lease. Try if it's supported. > Anyway, it's insane value as year lease time :) > > Eero > > 2016-07-06 11:22 GMT+03:00 G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < >
2018 Mar 29
2
dhcp lease time hardware in script at dhcpd/Bind/Samba wiki page
On 29/03/18 15:52, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:01:26 +0100 > Sebastian Arcus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> There seems to be a slight issue with the instructions at the >> following wiki page: >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 >> >> The
2018 Mar 29
3
dhcp lease time hardware in script at dhcpd/Bind/Samba wiki page
There seems to be a slight issue with the instructions at the following wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 The /usr/local/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh script seems to use a hardwired value for the lease expiry time of 3600 - independent of whatever is configured in dhcpd.conf. With the examples provided, it should work, as the example dhcpd.conf
2004 Apr 01
1
Asterisk + Cisco 7920 + chan_sccp or chan_skinny
Greetings, I have seen a few postings in the past regarding the interop of Asterisk and the Cisco 7920 WiFi phone. To date, I have not seen a definitive method to getting the phone working. Assuming someone has this actually working, can that person step up and answer these questions. 1) What Channel is it working with (chan_skinny or chan_sccp)? 2) If code was used that is not a part of a