Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "USB handset wanted"
2006 Nov 13
8
Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066">
<font size="+1">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I am interested in
2010 Apr 01
3
RPID on called party
Hello,
Did anyone manage to force asterisk to put Remote-party-ID attribute on
the SIP outgoing call? I.e. When A calls B, I want that A gets a name of
B displayed on his phone.
Note that name of A gets displayed on the B's phone fine, but this is
not what I want.
This works with Cisco Call manager fine - the RPID is sent as a part of
the response to the SIP INVITE this way:
SIP/2.0 180
2018 Mar 14
2
Expected performance for WORM scenario
We can't stick to single server because the law. Redundancy is a legal
requirement for our business.
I'm sort of giving up on gluster though. It would seem a pretty stupid
content addressable storage would suit our needs better.
On 13 March 2018 at 10:12, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com>
wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative
2018 Mar 13
3
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Well, it might be close to the _*synchronous*_ nfs, but it is still well
> behind of the asynchronous nfs performance.
>
> Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
>
>
>
> #!/bin/csh
>
>
>
> set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname`
>
> set j=1
2018 Mar 13
1
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache,
> but enabling that did not make much effect).
>
> To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small
> files for obvious reasons:
>
Could you give profile info of the run you did with
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, but enabling that did not make much effect).
To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small files for obvious reasons:
1. Single server, does not have to deal with distributed locks
2. Afaik, gluster does not support read/write delegations the same way NFS does.
3. Glusterfs is
2018 Mar 13
5
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek <
Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gluster will never perform well for small files.
>
> I believe there is nothing you can do with this.
>
It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to
NFS now.
Andreas,
Looking at your workload, I am suspecting there to be lot of LOOKUPs
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Well, it might be close to the _synchronous_ nfs, but it is still well behind of the asynchronous nfs performance.
Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture):
#!/bin/csh
set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname`
set j=1
while ($j <= 7000)
echo ahoj > test.$HOSTNAME.$j
@ j++
end
rm -rf test.$HOSTNAME.*
Takes 9 seconds to execute on the NFS share, but 90 seconds on
2006 Nov 13
3
FW: Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066">
Hi Dean,<br>
<br>
I will check that site - thanks for the hint.<br>
The biggest problem I see with
2018 Mar 07
1
gluster for home directories?
Hi,
On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Why do you need to replace your existing solution?
> If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async
> NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS
The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life.
The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses
standard components
2007 Sep 19
18
sip.conf best practices?
All - I've been wrestling with how to best structure the sip device
accounts on a new asterisk server I'm deploying. All of the sip
devices (currently only Linksys SPA941s) will reside on the same
subnet as the server, and I have already set up a decent automatic
provisioning system for the phones. When the rollout is complete,
there will be about 100 SIP devices authenticating and
2018 Mar 14
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
That seems unlikely. I pre-create the directory layout and then write to
directories I know exist.
I don't quite understand how any settings at all can reduce performance to
1/5000 of what I get when writing straight to ramdisk though, and
especially when running on a single node instead of in a cluster. Has
anyone else set this up and managed to get better write performance?
On 13 March
2012 Jun 01
2
ssh & control groups
Hi List,
I am looking for an option for sshd to start user's shell (when logging in interactively to a remote host) in a control group via cgexec -
so for example:
/bin/cgexec -g <username> /bin/bash
This would be extremely handy on linux Terminal servers to control users access to the system resources (protect system from a malicious
user hogging the machine by running cpu/memory
2008 Nov 06
2
TDM400 with FXS some handsets not ringing
Folks,
I have a TDM400 with an FXS module. I'm having some trouble ringing
some phones attached to the device.
I have a real el cheapo handset that cost me about 9UKP. It works fine,
I plug it into the Wildcard and call the channel and it rings.
I have tried plugging in my BT Diverse 3016 cordless phone but it will
not ring, although I can call out from it.
I have also tried my GPO 332L
2011 Feb 07
1
remote bridging
Hi List,
Quick question:
I am using asterisk 1.8.1 - how do I detect whether a native (remote) bridge is being used between 2 SIP peers?
It is not obvious to me from the console logs.
Thanks,
Ondrej
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110207/cf55a5dd/attachment.htm>
2009 May 21
2
Jitter buffer question
Hi List,
I have a question regarding jitterbuffer in Asterisk 1.4.24. I see that
jitterbuffer is only effective on the receiving channels.
My asterisk has only SIP accounts + 2 SIP trunk accounts to our branch
office.
Questions:
1. To enable jitter buffer on SIP channels it seems I have to enable and
force it, right?
2. If I enable and force jitter buffer, Asterisk would always have to
stay
2005 May 10
3
Phone attached to Sipura SPA-1001 has no ring
I hooked up a SPA-1001 with asterisk yesterday and all works well except
the phone doesn't ring.
The phone I'm using has a LCD display so I can see the call come in.
(with caller id info)
I can answer and complete the call but it's just not ringing.
The phone rings if pluged into a POTS line so it's not the phone that's
the problem.
I've used the SPA-1001's web
2006 May 25
2
Volume configuration on Polycom Soundpoint 501phone
Could not find your post for 4 months ago.
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Anton Krall" <akrall-lists@intruder.com.mx>
> Yes, check a post that I made about 4 months ago, I posted the cofig for
> setting the speaker, handset and ring volumes ..
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
>
2006 Feb 07
2
Handset phone to replace Flash Operator Panel
Hi All
Has anyone come across a handset that can somehow replace FOP? Some
users don't like FOP unless it is on a dedicated PC.
Thanks
Garth
2007 Jul 27
6
polycom custom ring tones (slightly OT)
Hi all,
Has anyone made up custom ring tones for the Polycom SIP phones? We use
different rings for different lines, but the ones it comes with are all very
similar. In the interesting of sharing, here's one I made up for paging:
<PAGE_BEEP se.pat.ringer.13.name="Page Beep"
se.pat.ringer.13.inst.1.type="chord" se.pat.ringer.13.inst.1.value="12"