similar to: Console Auto-Completion Lockup

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71362 Priority: medium Bug ID: 71362 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NVC1] X hang with drop to console after some time / GPU lockup Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: krah.tm at gmail.com

I assume this option was intentionally removed, and the man page should simply be updated...is this correct? ----- Forwarded message from Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it> ----- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 13:31:35 +0100 From: Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it> Resent-From: Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>

Hey, op 04-08-14 13:57, Christian K?nig schreef: > Am 04.08.2014 um 10:55 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> op 04-08-14 10:36, Christian K?nig schreef: >>> Hi Maarten, >>> >>> Sorry for the delay. I've got way to much todo recently. >>> >>> Am 01.08.2014 um 19:46 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> On 01-08-14 18:35, Christian K?nig

> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset. Yeah, well that's nothing new. > I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and only running the delayed work when !lockup. > But this meant that the timeout was useless to add. I think the cleanest is keeping the v2 patch, because potentially any waiting code can be called

op 04-08-14 10:36, Christian K?nig schreef: > Hi Maarten, > > Sorry for the delay. I've got way to much todo recently. > > Am 01.08.2014 um 19:46 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> >> On 01-08-14 18:35, Christian K?nig wrote: >>> Am 31.07.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at

op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian K?nig schreef: >> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset. > > Yeah, well that's nothing new. > >> I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and only running the delayed work when !lockup. >> But this meant that the timeout was useless to add. I think the cleanest is keeping

op 04-08-14 16:45, Christian K?nig schreef: > Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset. >>> Yeah, well that's nothing new. >>> >>>> I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and

op 04-08-14 17:04, Christian K?nig schreef: > Am 04.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> op 04-08-14 16:45, Christian K?nig schreef: >>> Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>>> op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset. >>>>> Yeah, well that's nothing new.

Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian K?nig schreef: >>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset. >> Yeah, well that's nothing new. >> >>> I've now tried other solutions but that would mean reverting to the old style during gpu lockup recovery, and only running the delayed work when !lockup. >>> But this

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- V1 had a nasty bug breaking gpu lockup recovery. The fix is not allowing radeon_fence_driver_check_lockup to take exclusive_lock, and kill it during lockup recovery instead. --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 3 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 5 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c |

Hi Maarten, Sorry for the delay. I've got way to much todo recently. Am 01.08.2014 um 19:46 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > > On 01-08-14 18:35, Christian K?nig wrote: >> Am 31.07.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> >>> --- >>> V1 had a nasty bug breaking gpu lockup

Hi, I have been trying to figure out why my Supermicro X7DWA-N with dual Xeon E5420''s locks up occasionally when running Xen, I''ve tried 3.2.1 and 3.3 with the Xensource 2.6.18 kernel, with gentoo 2.6.21, and 2.6.25 and 2.6.27 kernels patched with suse xen patches, every single combination suffers from occasional lockups :(, I am reasonably confident that the hardware is ok

It's mostly a cleanup, but in nv50_fbcon_accel_init gpu lockup message was printed, but HWACCEL_DISBALED flag was not set. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 15 +++++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fbcon.c | 15 +++++----------

Am 04.08.2014 um 10:55 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 04-08-14 10:36, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Hi Maarten, >> >> Sorry for the delay. I've got way to much todo recently. >> >> Am 01.08.2014 um 19:46 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> On 01-08-14 18:35, Christian K?nig wrote: >>>> Am 31.07.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:

Am 04.08.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > op 04-08-14 16:45, Christian K?nig schreef: >> Am 04.08.2014 um 16:40 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >>> op 04-08-14 16:37, Christian K?nig schreef: >>>>> It'a pain to deal with gpu reset. >>>> Yeah, well that's nothing new. >>>> >>>>> I've now tried other solutions

I observed that following could cause machine lockup since at least 8-CURRENT. Now I'm on 9-STABLE No usb in kernel, attached mouse pointer. # kldload usb ums ehci # kldload uhci or # kldload uhci usb ums ehci uhci is required for working mouse. Can anyone confirm? Please test few different iterations, as it's probably not easily reproducible. Most times nothing happens, if

Any thoughts on setting breakpoints around hypercalls? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> Date: Dec 26, 2005 12:14 AM Subject: setting breakpoints around hypercalls in a domU causes dom0 to lockup To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Keir Fraser < Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> Stepping through hypercalls (at the source level, not

Am 31.07.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> > --- > V1 had a nasty bug breaking gpu lockup recovery. The fix is not > allowing radeon_fence_driver_check_lockup to take exclusive_lock, > and kill it during lockup recovery instead. That looks like the delayed work starts running as soon as we submit a

On 01-08-14 18:35, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 31.07.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> >> --- >> V1 had a nasty bug breaking gpu lockup recovery. The fix is not >> allowing radeon_fence_driver_check_lockup to take exclusive_lock, >> and kill it during lockup recovery instead. >

When I try to umount btrfs filesystem I get always this error with kernel 3.11.4 and 3.11.3, but I can mount and umount without error on kernel 3.11.2. Exact error messages are: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [btrfs-transacti:680] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 23s! [umount:1575] I''m on Fedora 19 I have run scrub and there are no errors: # btrfs scrub status /home scrub