similar to: Motorola A910 WiFi + GSM phone

I got a call from an ISP friend tonight who said he is getting calls from people who are getting signed up with Vonage. Instead of sending them ATA186s, apparently they're receiving something made by Motorola. They apparently work significantly differently than the Cisco units, and there have been some problems. Anybody know anything further? Thx. B.

Hi all, I've just acquired a few Motorola OJO units, and am looking at testing them out with Asterisk. Having read the Ojo spec it seems they use an 'enhanced' version of h.264, which I believe is supported to some extent under 1.4 (?). Amongst other things, it seems that the Ojo allows for custom frame rates and picture sizes, outside the standard implementation of H.264(?) Does

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the Motorola Q has its Bluetooth always on like the IPhone? I want to use the Motorola Q in a Proximity Detection setup like that described on nerdvittles.com. I know the Treo 650 does not work well since the display must be on for the bluetooth to be on and this eats power. Thanks Chuck Bunn

Hi Everyone, Can anyone share their experience with Motorola Canopy solution deployment and Asterisk? Is this a good fit? Thanks, Bruce -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100817/09e5cb7b/attachment.htm

I have a mini-USB cable, but simply connecting a Motorola RAZR to a Linux (Centos 6) PC to download stored pictures doesn't work, at least not automatically. Any idea what I need to do to get Centos to recognize that a Motorola RAZR V3 is plugged in as a USB device? (I don't have a data plan on this phone - I'm just trying to get archived pictures off of it onto the computer.)

Hi All, Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review to reflect this change. I'm also asking for everyone's help to review all the patches. /* Target independent changes */ 1.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 3620 bytes Desc: dfs.ht1.jpg Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060626/d12d4001/attachment.jpeg

I have a small pile of them from customers who were too lazy to send them back after switching to our local voice service... Is there any hope of ever using these things with Asterisk? Vonage does not want them back and they won't unlock them either. A terrible shame! Should I just toss them? Steve

On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 20:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > As many of these classic systems still have very active communities, > especially the Amiga community, > development efforts are still very strong. For example, despite being the > oldest port of the Linux > kernel, the m68k port has still multiple active kernel

Hi All, We would like to contribute our supports for Motorola 68000 series CPU (also known as M68k or M680x0) into LLVM. And we want to hear feedbacks from you Here is some background for M68k: Motorola 68000 series CPU was one of the most popular CPUs used by personal computers in the ‘80, including some of the earliest Apple Macintosh. Fast-forwarding to modern days, M68k is still popular

Hi All, I have one asterisks server and 3 client (i'm using voip sip client for my handphone). I've configured sip.conf and extension.conf with 3 user different. And nothing wrong with them, i could make them to make a call too. what i want to ask is, i was try to use 1 user (ex:1001) in 2 different client. example: client 1 (1001) make a call to client 2 (1002) --> ok then in client

Hi, guys, For my server, if i use my handphone to call in the PSTN line by TDM400p card, the server could not receive the caller id correctly. anyone knows the problem? I am currently using asterisk 1.2.14 with freepbx 2.2.1. The CLI is as below, "Caller ID name is 'zap1' number is '4521'" , this 4521 is one of my FXS zap extension created. dialparties.agi: Starting New

Hi all! I don't cnow where can i ask about this and I hope you can halp me. I have a digital voice recorder olymus ds-2300, it's working with *.dss files (digital speech standart). There is Olympus Dss Player for Windows but nathing can play it with linux. On olympus development homepage i found "Sound SDK for WIndows" but they don't wont to make it open. Please can you

Hmmm.... it's a shame.... what are the minimum requirements for Fixed Point Speex? John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com Alain wrote: > Hi, no chance to run it on anything from Microchip, theyr best > processor is 16 Mips 8 bits only. For what I have been readind on this > list for more than a year you need a lot more than

Does anyone know of a Linux program, GUI preferred, for managing the phonebook list on the L6 cel phone? -- --- David Woyciesjes

Might any one have a pre-compile of samba for the old DGUX Motorola platform left anywhere? Thanks Tom

sorry, it seems I mistyped correctly the messages and the patch was to big to fit into the message. I'll find somewhere to upload it in order to get any help from you. Thanks

Hello! I can't connect my motorola phone with p2k programs. How can I do that without virtualbox or windows? If thats not possible, can I apply some options to make wine understand usb devices, while compiling?

Maybe somebody can help me. I'm testing my brand new [*], interconnecting it with several networks, but only via softphones up to now. I do have a VT1000 CPE from vonage, with a vonage line on the first FXS port, and would like to use the second FXS port to connect it to my [*] This is my question: My vonage VT1000 is connected between the cablemodem and a home gateway. Therefore, I

Hi Min! On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > Showing the prerequisites to become an experimental target and eventually, > an official target. We're currently struggling on setting up the buildbot > but I believe Adrian (CC-ed) is working on that. So I hope the patches can > be sorted out while waiting for the buildbot. The m68k machine is actually already up and running, I