similar to: Need to start from somewhere

Hello everyone, A few months back, I remember seeing either an online video or tutorial that covered using Rails where the "database" was a large collection of XML documents in a directory. I can''t remember much more than that about it (particularly what the application was), but now I''m facing a similar situation and I''d like to track that reference down

Hi, Is there an "before_commit" hook somewhere in Rails? (i.e. after all the saves & after_save callbacks occur, but just before the transaction commits?) -- Greg http://blog.gregnet.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group,

Hi, I am sure this is not going to do my reputation any good. I will be known as someone who just can't stop asking questions. Folks, I am guessing there are not too many Amiga people out there. Shame really. But anyway, in follow up to my problems about getting the two machines talking to one another: I kind of got the password thing resolved but it re-apperared. Then dis-appeared

Hi, I have been following the development of the /zorg/trunk/lnt project for a while and am wondering if there is some regular LLVM performance testing using LNT that can be accessed online? Are there any plans to create an officially used web service for this like e.g the llvm buildbots? Thanks a lot Tobi

On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Hi, > > I have been following the development of the /zorg/trunk/lnt project for > a while and am wondering if there is some regular LLVM performance > testing using LNT that can be accessed online? Are there any plans to > create an officially used web service for this like e.g the llvm buildbots? I have a nightly tester

On 12/06/2010 03:33 PM, Bob Wilson wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have been following the development of the /zorg/trunk/lnt project for >> a while and am wondering if there is some regular LLVM performance >> testing using LNT that can be accessed online? Are there any plans to >> create an officially

I am trying to follow this tutorial: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2009-10/Korobeynikov_BackendTutorial.pdf However, figuring out what can and cannot be deleted from the sparc backend while still compiling is proving rather frustrating. -Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> However, figuring out what can and cannot be deleted from the sparc backend > while still compiling is proving rather frustrating. Why are you looking into sparc backend? I believe the talk makes clear which backend should be considered as a start point (at that time). In any case, https://github.com/asl/llvm-openrisc is better "stub" backend, at least it's 'just' 6

hi, klaus Console output: *CLI> -- Registered SIP '' at 192.168.16.114 port 12410 expires 1200 -- Executing Goto("SIP/ola-5a9c", "capiring|BYEXTENSION|1") in new stack -- Goto (capiring,81520400,1) -- Executing Dial("SIP/ola-5a9c", "CAPI/22545079:bBYEXTENSION|120|Ttr") in new stack == data = 22545079:b81520400 == capi request

I'm slightly confused about how SIP security and authorization works. I've looked at the Wiki (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+user+vs+peer) , but it's, um, flawed: > As of Asterisk 1.2, there is no reason to actually use 'user' entries > any more at all; you can use 'type=peer' for everything and the behavior > will be much more

Let me preface this by saying that, I realize I should be asking this in *-bsd, but I posted there last week and heard nothing so I thought I would post here to see if anyone had any thoughts: I just compiled all these from source: asterisk-1.2.9.1 zaptel-bsd (from svn downloaded on jun 8) libpri-1.2.3 spandsp-0.0.2.p20_1 (from FreeBSD ports) The system is AMD64 so I had to modify the

In case it's missed :) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Dovecot] mbox somewhere else? Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:26:30 +0200 From: Tolga <kartagis at kunduz.org> To: dovecot at dovecot.org Hi, I want to store my folders somewhere else, it used be in ~/mail. Is this as easy as moving everything in ~/mail to /var/mail/ and editing /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf to read

Hi, I want to store my folders somewhere else, it used be in ~/mail. Is this as easy as moving everything in ~/mail to /var/mail/ and editing /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf to read mail_location=mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u ? Also, is the syntax mail_location=mbox:/var/mail/%u-folders:INBOX=/var/mail/%u correct? Regards, -- Whatever it is, I fear Greeks even when they bring gifts. -- Publius

Hello, I would like to set up a POP account which also forwards email elsewhere. In qmail for example it is easy to set up by creating a dot qmail file inside the users mailbox. How can this be done with Postfix? For awareness I'm using Postfix + Dovecot for POP3 authentication. Thanks, Duncan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm running Dovecot v2.1 and enabled the lmtp_rcpt_check_quota option in conf.d/20-lmtp.conf, because I just found it in the sample config. Is this option working somewhere? When I have the option enabled, I get _no_ response in the RCPT TO phase, if the user is under quota. If I go on and enter the DATA keyword eventually, I get

On 5.9.2019 5.29, Michael Fincham via dovecot wrote: > Hi Dovecot folks, > > I recently reported this bug in Debian (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939442) after a stretch -> buster upgrade, however since I can reproduce it using the latest 2.4 from git I thought perhaps I ought to take it straight upstream. > > Here's the text I provided Debian about the

Hi Aki, other devs, On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 08:57:30 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > Thank you for reporting this bug, we are tracking it internally as DOP-1408. Did a fix for this ever happen? Not urgent, just want to make sure I didn't miss anything. Cheers, -- Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:16:37PM -0800, Dave Taht wrote: > I have been gradually moving more tinc servers over to ipv6 addresses > on the tinc 1.1 branch. > > Tinc is inserting a default route for ipv6 for some reason... > > default via 2600:3c01:e030:f2::1 dev tinc6 proto static metric 950 > pref medium > > In my case the default route supplied by ra is still

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:43:44PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > - On Linux, add "echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/$INTERFACE/accept_ra" > to tinc-up before any ifconfig or ip commands. Ah, if it's only the default route you don't want, then it's: echo 0 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/$INTERFACE/accept_ra_defrtr -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,

Hi folks, are there any more detailed docs about those scripts? I have some annoying issues there and I can't find anything about that in the docs. If using usrmgr.exe is it possible to tweak the "add user script" that the full name of a user is stored too, like if I add the user manually with adduser (debian) or useradd -c "Full Name" -m username on (most?) other