similar to: Stupid hold music

I have a repetative task in R and i'm trying to find a more efficient way to perform the following task. lst <- list(roots = c("car insurance", "auto insurance"), roots2 = c("insurance"), prefix = c("cheap", "budget"), prefix2 = c("low cost"), suffix = c("quote", "quotes"),

I am trying to use a meta data set with information about some repetative analysis that I have to do for a variables measured on multiple occasions. I think the best way to explain the problem is by using a simplified example. So here goes: I have a data frame called "meta" say with the following content: Test Min Max Low High APS 0 40 -10 10 TPP 0 120 -8 8 NOS

Hello all, Does a generator exist to generate the ActiveRecord model from the database? I wouldn''t mind if it generated parent-child relations always as has_many - belongs_to. The scenario in my case is a database of about 180 legacy tables, with a pattern that the foreign keys use (<parent table name>_OID). These I''d like to wrap in the model as easily as

Got a HBS (y'know, Honkin' Big Server, one o' them technical terms), a Dell 720 with two Tesla GPUs. I updated the o/s, 6.5, and I cannot get the GPUs recognized. As a last resort, I d/l NVidia's proprietary driver/installer, 325, and it builds fine... I've yum removed the kmod-nvidia I had on the system, nouveau is blacklisted, and when I reboot, lsmod shows me nvidia loaded,

Hey, folks, I'm working on finding some new compute nodes. What I'm looking for is a 64 core box, with room enough for a lot of RAM. I can get it from Dell, or HP (bleah! a 4U box), but I need to have three quotes, y'know. We've gotten a lot from Penguin in the past, but they're all Supermicro, and we've had a *lot* of problems with the 64 core boxes, so I'm looking

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, November 2, 2017 11:21 am, hw wrote: >> Richard Zimmerman wrote: >>> hw wrote: >>>> Next question: you want RAID, how much storage do you need? Will 4 or >>>> 8 >>>> 3.5" drives be enough (DO NOT GET crappy 2.5" drives - they're *much* >>>> more expensive than the 3.5" drives,

Posted on behalf of Mark (m.roth at 5-cent.us) who is currently experiencing technical difficulties with his Internet connection --------------------------------- > On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 11:23 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > >> I really think that if someone is actually interested in helping the project, rather than being a backseat driver and griping at every change ........

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:03 -0500, Tanya Lattner wrote: > Reid, > > First, thanks for the excellent overview. This seems like it will be very > useful. > > I have a question about dist-check. > > You mention that it will triple the amount of disk space I am using. I am > guessing its because it does the following: > > 11. runs make dist > > 12.

Y'know, I was just reading an article about a Spanish Linux group filing a complaint with the EU regulators about UEFI, and I was struck by a thought: why is it that the OEM does not provide the UEFI key with the hardware FOR THAT BOARD AND UEFI, rather than have it provided by M$? Any clues (or should I just assume it's more M$ kickbacks...)? mark

> ps: my little suggestion: if we add some parameters at smb.conf like > protected dir = /home/share, /home/user1 ; > trashcan dir = /smbtrash ; Such an addon to samba would make me weep tears of joy. The trashcan is a "security blanket" feature that Windows/MacOS/OS2/BeOS users now take for granted. Convincing them that this is now impossible because we've

Hi Reid, > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:03 -0500, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > It it necessary for dist-check to run make dist? > > Y'know, when I typed that, I knew you were going to ask that. It > doesn't make sense to me either. Seems a bit overkillish to me. I think a `make distcheck' should do a `make dist' because it checks that a tarball can reproduce itself.

Reid, First, thanks for the excellent overview. This seems like it will be very useful. I have a question about dist-check. You mention that it will triple the amount of disk space I am using. I am guessing its because it does the following: > 11. runs make dist > 12. runs make clean > 13. runs make dist-clean It it necessary for dist-check to run make dist? Why would we

Robert Heller wrote: > At Tue, 29 May 2018 06:47:06 -0700 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > wrote: >> On 05/29/2018 06:33 AM, Robert Heller wrote: >> > >> >> The UUID in the EFI boot options is >> >> 99E275E7-75A0-4B37-A2E6-C5385E600CB, which >> >> does not to match anything, but the system is only happy booting the >>

Hi, Has anyone on this list had any success with installing and using Open Cobol on RH or CentOS? Any pointers would be very welcome. I have Googled and am working with Vince on the Open Cobol mailing list to try to resolve installation problems. ChrisG

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? > > > > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. >

For reasons that are best known to myself [ ;-) ] I have a value of .Random.seed saved (via dput()) in a file ``.Random.seed.save''. In my .Rprofile I have the lines: .Random.seed <- dget(".Random.seed.save") Junk <- dget(".Random.seed.save") print(all.equal(.Random.seed,dget(".Random.seed.save")))

Hi, I am new to speex so please redirect me to some links if the question is repetative. Just for testing the echo canceller performance, I have added mdf,fftwrap,misc,kiss_fftr,kiss_fft source files to my project. Now In my multithread application when I receive packets from mice, I calls speex_echo_capture(echo_state, input_frame, output_frame,Youtput_frame) with input_frame as

One of the things that turned me on to BDD and RSpec was speccing views first, that the desired end would drive the development. In previous projects while using Test::Unit I would try to make educated guesses as to what would be needed in the model and controllers to derive the view without actually writing the view until afterwards. This is all because testing relied on each previous

All, I have a new box. Gigabyte motherboard AM2 sempron 3200+. CentOS installed fine, I rebooted after the install. It booted fine again. I ran yum -y update and now after that on boot it says Initializing hardware Storage network audio done Disabling IRQ #193 and then nothing. just sets there.... Any ideas on that??? Jerry

Howdy, I've got an interesting behavior change in Agent in Wine as compared to Agent in Windows. (And it doesn't have to do with the Clipboard ;-) When I spell check an email in Agent(Windows), and I get a word not found, I get a window that shows the not found word with a highlighted suggested correction. When I spell check an email in Agent(Wine) the same thing happens except the