similar to: Agent Penalty

Hi Dominik, Thanks for your reply. In my case, the Defs is the cause of the problem. Or rather, it is part of the problem, because when I remove it from the instruction TableGen gives me a different error message which concerns a part which is deeper into the pattern tree, so at least it is able to proceed beyond that part of the pattern. I have also stepped TableGen inside gdb and

Hi Daniel, Thanks for replying; I was hoping to get in touch with you on this issue. I had a look at how SelectionIDAG does it when generating the matcher table, and it does consider the implicit defs as additional output. Here is the match table generated for the pattern: /* 0*/ OPC_CheckOpcode, TARGET_VAL(ISD::SIGN_EXTEND), /* 3*/ OPC_MoveChild0, /* 4*/ OPC_CheckOpcode,

Anyone have experience specifying the "penalty.factor" option in the "glmnet" command? I have 3 variables (out of a million genotype variables) that I want to force into the model (i.e., set penalty factor to 0), but I can't figure out how to do that. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, all I am trying to get the basis matrix and penalty matrix for natural cubic splines. In the "splines" package of R,"ns" can generate the B-spline basis matrix for a natural cubic spline. How can I get the basis matrix and penalty matrix for natural cubic spline. Thanks a lot! Lee [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I was reviewing the patch Patrick McHardy has contributed to squid QoS features (http://trash.net/~kaber/squid-qos/), and decided to do something similar which could classify client side traffic based on whether SQUID''s response is a cache HIT or a cache MISS. I think I got it working. I made a quick home page for this patch, so anyone interested in trying it can learn more here:

hi everybody a newbie here, hoping some experienced users/expert can honestly answer this one question, and I think I realize all other advantages libvirtoffer but simply performance, does libvirt make a user pay penalty, even if only a small amount, for using it when compared to raw qemu-kvm command line? if it does where the overhead goes? quest or host, or maybe both? lastly if overall

I've hit two roadblocks while using openssh -D as a general proxy: - openssh doesn't have an internal-null, so the options are to either give the user account a real shell and ForceCommand, or set the shell to something like /bin/cat and ChrootDirectory. I don't want proxy-only accounts to have a shell at all. - Comparing mini-httpd SSL/aes256 vs mini-httpd (localhost/no SSL) via

It's so you can have agents that are less likely to take calls (e.g. imagine a sales queue, you'd have the sales people with no penalty, you might have the receptionists with a penalty of 1 and us propeller heads in technical support with a penalty of 2). The technical support people would only be offered a call from the sales queue if all the sales people and the receptionists were busy.

Hi, I've uploaded a new patch at https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16722which adds a new option to queues.conf. The new option is notpresent-penalty, which is an amount of seconds to wait before calling a agent that doesn't answer, again. This feature is especially nice if you are using penalties on members of a queue. I would be very happy if someone could help me test this

Since the changesets: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/9bec70f26637 http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/75b48fa3aec4 there is another problem. A `dovecot stop`, while auth and auth -w are still running, logs: Nov 12 03:17:00 master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=31656 uid=0 code=kill) Nov 12 03:17:00 auth: Error: read(anvil-auth-penalty) failed: EOF Nov 12 03:17:00 auth:

Hi Timo, on a 32bit Debian squeeze/sid system, with gcc-4.4 (Debian 4.4.2-9) 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) I'm getting this warnings: penalty.c: In function ?penalty_timeout?: penalty.c:169: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions test-penalty.c: In function ?test_penalty_checksum?: test-penalty.c:27: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We're running multiple instances on the same server. While doveadm penalty works: root at host:/etc/dovecot# doveadm penalty IP penalty last_penalty last_update 93.180.xxx.xxx 4 2014-05-10 12:21:08 12:21:08 80.153.xxx.xxx 0 2014-05-10 12:21:12 12:21:12 a seperate anvil-Socket doesn't work at all: root

Using doveadm penalty I just noticed a penalty for 0.0.0.0. Is this Postfix querying the auth-socket for his SASL-requests? I tried adding 0.0.0.0 to login_trusted_networks, but that doesn't help. Peer -- Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin http://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-42 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Zwangsangaben lt. ?35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B /

Hi all, I want to remove the authentication penalty for specific ip addresses (subnets if possible). I am using Dovecot 2.3.2 (582970113) and figured that this information: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Penalty > If the IP is in login_trusted_networks (e.g. webmail), skip any authentication penalties is not up to date. Instead this information is:

Hi, all, I am using the lars package for lasso estimate. So I get a lasso fit first: lassofit = lars(x,y,type ="lasso",normalize=T, intercept=T) Then I want to get coefficient with respect to a certain value of \lambda (the tuning parameter), I know lars has three mode options c("step", "fraction", "norm"), but can I use the \lambda value instead

Hi there, I've had a look through the wiki and a quick look through the source for penalty configurations (dovecot 2.0.9) but I've not found anything to do with configuration options for this functionality. I'm basically wanting to disable a particular host/subnet from the penalty setup. In our case we have some webmail servers that do get attacked however most of the traffic is

Hello all R-help list subscribers, I'd like to create a regression tree of a data set with binary response variable. Only 5% of observations are a success, so the regression tree will not find really any variable value combinations that will yield more than 50% of probability of success. I am however interested in areas where the probability of success is noticeably higher than 5%, for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using Dovecot v2.2 with unix_listener auth-client { } to verify passwords for a different service. However, it looks like that auth_failure_delay effects all connects going through that socket. I mean: connect /var/run/dovecot2.2/auth-client attempt bad auth 2s penalty NO disconnect ==> Note, it's another connection almost

Hi, I've been playing with agent penalties (Asterisk 1.6.2.16). I've set up multiple agents, and as documented agents with the lowest penalty value get called first. The issue I have is that if the agent with the very lowest penalty does not answer, instead of going with to the second best agent the queue rings the same agent over and over and over again. I've realized that

Hi, all. I'm checking in about an issue that has been mentioned here a few times, but to which I can't seem to find a solution for a very present need. The summary is that we'd like to have a queue that rings logged-in agents in the same order every time, based on penalty, in a way that continuously escalates the attempts to the next penalty level until all agents have been tried.