similar to: SMS Handler in Asterisk

Hello all, Recently I purchased an QuadBRI card from junghanns.net after some playing around, reconfiguring dialplans etc with the exception of 1 thing everything seems to work: I seem to be unable to set the outbound callerid. The dutch telecom operator (KPN) provided me with 4 MSN's on 1 BRI interface. In the past years I'm more then used to setting the MSN without the leading 0, this

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Shorewall version 2.2.1 2 Interface setup. eth1: 10.10.1.3 eth0: 192.168.1.2 modem is 192.168.1.1 I need to be able to connect to my adsl modem, but when shorewall is up I get connection rejected. I have added "192.168.1.1 RETURN" above the line "192.168.0.0/16 logdrop # RFC 1918" in "/etc/shorewall/rfc1918" but still getting connection rejected Is there

Most of the time i can find answers to my questions on the wiki, google, or searching the list now i am stuck . I have a small * box at my house running 1.0.9 stable and a devlite kit. Every thing is awesome VM, IVR, Echo canceling, and Meetme are all working great. But on Incoming caller id i need to add a 9 as a prefix to make it easier to return call from my cordless phone (cheap vtech

Hello Tom, I am not sure if you can help with this but I am at my wits end. If you hit this site and do a force refresh (ctrl + F5) the site will time out and lose connections. Do the same on port 443 and it does not time out??? The web site I am reffering to is www.tituswill.com I think the only problem is port 80. Do you have any idea how to diagnose this I have sent a dump of just

Bit of a shorewall newbie so if the answer is obvious please be gentle. We have been using version 1.4.2 for a while now and are very happy with how it performs, however we are looking to increase the resilience of our internet connection by providing a second internet feed. The idea being that should the primary connection fail shorewall will transparently (as far as users are concerned) switch

Hi, I have shorewall 2.0.8 installed on a linux box. Recently I moved to a setup with a front/back firewall With shorewall acting as a front firewall and M$ ISA Server 2004 acting as a back firewall. I turned all ''intrusion alerts'' On at the ISA server expecting not to get any since shorewall should block everything. Now to the problem: I am getting quite a few alerts

Hi there, I''m not sure if I can do this with shorewall, but any points on the right direction would be of great help... I need to have a LAN with access only enabled to certain set of computers. I was planning on having the dhcp server just give IPs to certain MAC addresses, but if a smart guy configures his computer manually with a valid IP for the LAN he can get access to the LAN

We have a webserver that is connected to three different networks. Due to our cabling, we have to run two of those networks over the same physical network. When connecting from OS X and Windows we are occasionally blocked because the client is sending to the wrong interface. Linux clients seem to have no problem at all. I have read the docs and understand that the problems exists because of

Good point Stijn, I am sorry to post without subject and such it must be the early morning. The relevant entries in my rules file: ACCEPT net fw tcp 25 ACCEPT net fw tcp 80 ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 ACCEPT net fw tcp 21 ACCEPT net fw udp 21 REJECT loc

hi, it''d be very useful to add some kind of "log everything" option to shorewall. currently the logging is useful if you know what you would like to log. but if you don''t know than it''s a problem... another problem that currently it''s not possible to log the nat table. at least i can''t find any way (can''t add logging into masq and

Hi I want to setup a SMS system for Nagios on a 5.9 box. I read in a blog that the two modems Huawei [ E160G | E176 ] work with 6.3. Anybody any experience with those modems and do they work with 5.9? Are there any other devices that are better/recommended? Thanks Jobst -- 186,262 miles/second : Not just a good idea, it's the LAW. | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jobst at

Hello I got about 20 different people using 20 different PC''s in my Lan. Five of them should have unrestricted access to the internet any time of the day. Yet the rest of them should only have access at certain timeframes during the day. Two of them should have no access at all. I am well experienced in writing rules (for the rules file) that make all this possible, yet i was

Hi all, I have a client that has 4 subnets within his building, internet, office, business center and wireless. My plan is to use Shorewall but I have never tested it with more than 2 interfaces. Is this possible? Would there be any issues that might arise. Each subnet would have access to the internet but there will be no communications allowed between the others. Thanks in advance....

hi all, can someone help explaining what we are seeing? it makes no sense to us. this is a host running centos 7.4 with 3.10.0-693.17.1 kernel, and it has 192GB of ram > [] free -b > total used free shared buff/cache available > Mem: 201402642432 14413479936 75642777600 48586752 111346384896 185689632768 > Swap: 21474832384 31961088

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM, Akemi Yagi <toracat at elrepo.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Stijn De Weirdt <stijn.deweirdt at ugent.be> wrote: >> latest kmod update 20-15.el7_4.6 is broken on our systems, while >> previous 20-15.el7_4.4 was working fine (and downgrading fixes the issue). >> >> the issue is with modules from mellanox

Dear Rexperts, First of all let me say that R is a wonderful and useful piece of software. The only thing is that sometimes it takes me a long time to find out how something can be done, especially when aiming to write compact (and efficient) code. For instance, I have the following function (very rudimentary) which takes a (very specific) data frame as input and for certain subsets

hi johnny, >> anyone any hints how to debug this or some clues what could be going >> wrong here. > > Do you have an exclude in /etc/yum.conf for ibutils-libs? how embarassing. there was indeed an exclude on ibutils-libs. (this must be some leftover from using mlnx ofed. we are switching from c73+mlnx ofed 3.4 to c74 stock ib (there's no mlnxofed3.4 for c74, and our old

hi all, latest kmod update 20-15.el7_4.6 is broken on our systems, while previous 20-15.el7_4.4 was working fine (and downgrading fixes the issue). the issue is with modules from mellanox kmod rpms that are symlinked in the weak-updates dir. the config files in /etc/depmod.d look ok (and do work with previous version): dist.conf has weak-updates after built-in, and mellanox kmod rpms ship a

Dear R users, I have a problem with reshaping data. I know such questions have been asked before, but I can't get it right, neither with the reshape function nor with the melt function. My dataset has about 407 variables and about 48000 cases. Each case looks as follows: V1 v2 v3 v4 v5 v6 v7 x1 y1 x2 y2 .... x200 y200 V1 is unique, v2-v7 are