similar to: $0-per-month (pay as you go) provider with T.38?

I'm getting really wierd errors from them, like bad packet checksums: Jun 27 18:22:56 NOTICE[29051]: rtp.c:435 ast_rtp_read: RTP: Received packet with bad UDP checksum - a -- "I didn't see it then, but it turned out that getting fired was the best thing that could have ever happened to me. The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner

Just received: Cognigen is very proud to announce the official launch of Broadvox Direct, a new VOIP service. Broadvox Direct offers unlimited calling plans to anywhere in the US and Canada for a low monthly payment starting at $29.95 and basic accounts as low as $12.95. http://cognigen.net/broadvox/?mu Anyone know who's behind that? It's not BroadVoice, is it?

Guys, For what it's worth, after months of trying to troubleshoot issues with them, and after paying them around $2500 for setup and a down payment (it's unclear what of that will be refunded, if any) BroadVox -- http://www.broadvox.net/ -- decided to terminate our contract without any valid reason, and the only explanation they could cite was "it's because of the software

I have a NY 212 packet8 service if you would like to work with me to set this up on my A@H service, I'm happy to test this with you. Cheers, Dean > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Adam Megacz > Sent: Sunday, 7 August 2005 5:29 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

What are your experiences with faxing through Asterisk to the PSTN? We are using g.711u as a codec, and are originating/terminating with Broadvox as well as through our own PSTN gateways. We have had some luck with incoming faxes coming into our network from Broadvox DIDs. They work 50% of the time. Not sure yet on PSTN incoming since nobody that is using FAX is in our local rate centers.

We're having an odd issue with codec negotiation from one of our SIP providers. Here's the basic situation. We receive an invite from them advertising support for G711, G729, and G723. In our response, we send back that we support G711 and G729. In about half the cases, this results in no problems, with audio being encoded with G711. The other half of the time, they send us a second

I'm wondering if any other Asterisk users have a recommendation for a reliable SIP Trunk provider that supports Asterisk and offers decent support. I've worked with Coredial, Broadvox, and Broadvoice and have had some bad experiences with each of these providers. Broadvoice offers low cost service, however I have constant issues with Broadvoice blocking my customers due to Asterisk

Dear List, I am using constrOptim to solve the following fr1 <- function(x) { b0 <- x[1] b1 <- x[2] ((1/(1+exp(-b0+b1))+(1/(1+exp(-b0)))+(1/(1+exp(-b0-b1)))))/3 } As you can see, my objective function is ((1/(1+exp(-b0+b1))+(1/(1+exp(-b0)))+(1/(1+exp(-b0-b1)))))/3 and I would like to solve for both b0 and b1. If I were to use optim then I would derive the gradient of the

Dear List, I have the code below, where I am using the constrained optimisation package, 'constrOptim.nl' to find the values of two values, b0 and b1. I have no problems when I enter further variable information DIRECTLY into the functions, fn, and heq. In this instance I require fn to have -0.0075 appended to it, and in the case of heq, h[1] has -0.2. library(alabama)

Dear Friends. I found something very puzzling with constOptim(). When I change the parameters for ConstrOptim, the error messages do not seem to be consistent with each other: > constrOptim(c(0.5,0.3,0.5), f=fit.error, gr=fit.error.grr, ui=ui,ci=ci) Error in constrOptim(c(0.5, 0.3, 0.5), f = fit.error, gr = fit.error.grr, : initial value not feasible > constrOptim(c(0.5,0.9,0.5),

Hi, I think that there something wrong with the 'constrOptim' max/minimization function because she doesn?t send extra arguments to 'optim' call. Fact: When I use optim in a f(x,theta)-like function, everything goes ok. But using constrOptim with the same function leads to error... Proof: Make a small change in the 'Rosenbrock Banana function' (taken from the Examples

Dear R users, I?m a graduate students and in my master thesis I must obtain the values of the parameters x_i which maximize this Multinomial log?likelihood function log(n!)-sum_{i=1]^4 log(n_i!)+sum_ {i=1}^4 n_i log(x_i) under the following constraints: a) sum_i x_i=1, x_i>=0, b) x_1<=x_2+x_3+x_4 c)x_2<=x_3+x_4 I have been using the ?ConstrOptim? R-function with the instructions

Hi All, I'm trying to do the following constrained optimization example. Maximize x1*(1-x1) + x2*(1-x2) + x3*(1-x3) s.t. x1 + x2 + x3 = 1 x1 >= 0 and x1 <= 1 x2 >= 0 and x2 <= 1 x3 >= 0 and x3 <= 1 which are the constraints. I'm expecting the answer x1=x2=x3 = 1/3. I tried the "constrOptim" function in R and I'm running into some issues. I first start off

Dear all, There appears to be a bug in how constrOptim handles ... arguments that are suppose to be passed to optim, according to the documentation. This means you can't get the hessian to be returned, for example (so this is a real problem, and not just a question of mistaken documentation). Looking at the code, it appears that a call to the user-defined f includes the ..., when the ...

Asterisk 1.4.32 (Also 1.4.26, 1.4.33) Broadvox ITSP (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) Linksys 2102 (yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) Both peers : canreinvite=yes t38pt_udptl = yes I'm having some trouble getting a T.38 fax call established with Broadvox. During negotiation, Asterisk sends a SIP re-invite (T38 switchover) to Broadvox with the Asterisk server's IP address in the Connection Information (c) instead of

Dear friends. I am using function constrOptim(c(0.5,0.3,0.5), fit.error, fit.error.grr, ui=-1*ui,ci=-1*ci) and I am confronted with error message "initial value not feasible" I plug in the initial value of (0.5,0.3,0.5) to function fit.error and fit.error.grr and have pretty reasonable result. I inequality "ui %*% theta - ci >= 0" as suggested in the R manual and it is

Hi, i have a function: zz<- (constrOptim(c(.5,0), fr, grr, ui=rbind(c(-1,0),c(1,-1)), ci=c(-0.9,0.1))) i can get the result by using command (for example): zz$par now if i can use multicore: zz<-parallel(constrOptim(c(.5,0), fr, grr, ui=rbind(c(-1,0),c(1,-1)), ci=c(-0.9,0.1))) result < collect(zz) i cant get my the result: result$par because multicore add process id. for example:

So what are people using these days for SIP or IAX to PSTN gateways. 1. Do any of the standard companies (Packet8, Broadvox, Vonage, etc.) allow you to use your own SIP device (phone or something like *) instead of the interface hardware they usually provide? 2. What about latency and reliability? 3. Finally, do any of the providers deliver more than one call via SIP? In otherwords, if

Me again... I have service with a company that does not allow for a BYOD plan. They will not give out credential or server info either. Is it possible to run the FXS port of the ATA to an FXO port in *? The service I have is throug Broadvox Direct using the Mediatrix 2102. I have tried this using loop start and kewl start. The * box sees the incoming ring, picks up and starts my dial plan. But

Apparently nobody has a suggestion to why smbd process all of a sudden starts sucking CPU like crazy? Restarted samba and then restarting the entire server does not fix it. Searching the archives shows I'm not the only one with this problem. The archives do not show what to do about it yet. Grr... Redhat 9.0 Samba 3.04 ( I have 2.2.7 servers that have done this to me also) - Gary