similar to: problem with pf and asterisk

Hi All, I have an asterisk box on my DMZ, and I'm using a PF for my firewall, I can make a call but some reasons I have a dead air. Any Ideas? below are my rules... ext_if = "bce0" int_if = "bce1" altitude = "172.16.1.0/24" #### machines #### vbox = "172.16.1.1" uci = "172.16.1.4" voices = "203.172.x.1" ipc =

I'm trying to use pf + ftp-proxy n a 6.1-PRERELEASE machine. I have this line on inetd.conf: ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftp-proxy ftp-proxy -n And this lines on pf.conf: rdr on $int_if proto tcp from any to any port ftp -> 127.0.0.1 port ftp-proxy pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any port ftp-data to $ext_if:0 user proxy flags S/SA keep

Hello, I have problems with htb. The problem is that when I download any file via shaper with htb, the traffic is very dinamic, it jumps, for example: if i have set ceil = 128kbit the results that it jumps from 112kbps to 144kbps or smth like that maybe its not very bad, but when the traffic drops down to 40kbps or less and then after 1 or 2 seconds jumps to 144kbps, its bad :-( and it is often.

Has anybody on this managed to get ChilliSpot and Shorewall to work together? I have managed to get it to work with the supplied firewall script but if I wanted to do my firewall like that I would not be using Shorewall. At any rate, I am having all kinds of trouble translating the supplied rules to something that Shorewall would understand. If anybody has already done it I would love to see the

Morning All, I have a boolean value called: countyid with the i.d. of XL Is it possible to give a unique entry two values so if I search for XL1 or XL2 this unique entry is shown in both queries? Cheers John

Gang, For months now, we're all seeing repeated bruteforce attempts on SSH. I've configured my pf install to ratelimit TCP connections to port 22 and to automatically add IP-addresses that connect too fast to a table that's filtered: table <lamers> { } block quick from <lamers> to any pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 22 modulate

ive got such network: |--------| |-------------| | WORLD |---|ROUTER/server| ------ NATED LAN |--------| |-------------| I want to use imq on ROUTER, what behaviour to choose ? AA, BA, AB, BB ?? --

I came across a problem when one of our clients was not able to access any of the servers on our network. This person has never connected to us before and now for this first time was trying to do it from his home is Houston, TX using earthlink cable service provided by Time Warner. All this information, I think, is important because when I started examining my shorewall logs I found out

I have configured asterisk with the AMP php configuration utility. I am able to make outgoing calls through broadvoice but incoming calls are sent to BV's Voicemail and never actually enter the IVR. When I show sip debug info through the asterisk prompt it actually reads the incoming call from BV but then issues a busy signal sending the call to BV's voicemail. I also modified

I try use setup traffic shaping with Shorewall-4.0.2 and have fault. When i start Shorewall with tc-files configured i get follow messages: ... RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory We have an error talking to the kernel ERROR: Command "tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 500kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1" Failed

Any BFD/AFP softwares available for FreeBSD 4.10? Im getting flooded with ssh and ftp attempts.

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Janos Mohacsi >Organization: NIIF/HUNGARNET >Confidential: no >Synopsis: pf does not use IPv6 interface addresses at startups >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Category: bin >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD scone.ki.iif.hu 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #23: Wed May 9 18:23:24

I have this kind of network: /==========\ /==========\ /==========\ | ROUTER 1 |---| FIREWALL |---| INTERNET | \==========/ \==========/ \==========/ | | /==========\ /==========\ | LAN | | ROUTER 2 | \==========/ \==========/ The firewall allows only ports 80 and 443 to the internet and 22 to the ROUTER 2. It also allows everything from ROUTER 2 to the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1248 Bug ID: 1248 Summary: The rr-load-balance part doesn't actually work on 0.7 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

Does anyone know of any plans to add an intercom/all-page feature in *? The few SIP phones that have auto-answer capability would be better if Asterisk could broadcast one leg of a channel to many legs at one time. Thank you, Steve Maroney

What changes would I need to make if there is a 4th interface that is going to a DMZ Thanks Gene

Has anyone implemented a script to block IPs which are attacking on POP3 ports using dovecot logs to indicate repetitive failed login attempts? sshblack does this nicely for ssh (port 22) attacks by monitoring the /var/log/secure file. I am considering rewriting this to POP3 port (110), but if it has already been done, I sure don't need the practice. Thanks!

Hi all, Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway? Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server) and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1. Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails on 7.0). After creating the jail with `ezjail-admin update -i` I created a 'ports build' jail `ezjail-admin

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

Hi all, Can someone please help with a tcng setup? I have played with tc and tcng in the past, and now would like to get some serious rules in place. However, I have a difficulty in setting them up. My setup is as follows: One machine working as a firewall: eth0 is the interface connected to a 512K DSL line eth1 is connected to a LAN eth2 is connected to another LAN, a bit like a DMZ eth1 and