similar to: Latest CVS and app_rxfax

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Latest CVS and app_rxfax"

2006 Apr 14
2
asterisk 1.2.7.1 and app_rxfax
Hi! After upgrading to asterisk 1.2.7.1 (from 1.2.4) it seems that app_rxfax doesnt work any more. I've installed spandsp-0.0.2pre25 (the same problem with spandsp-0.0.3pre6.tgz ) app_rxfax.c, app_txfax.c and made the Makefile patch from the same directory. When starting asterisk I always get the follwing error message: [app_rxfax.so]Apr 14 18:54:20 WARNING[7223]: loader.c:325
2007 Mar 28
1
App_RXFax Problem.
Good day everyone, Hope someone can help me with a spandsp/app_rxfax problem. I've compiled spandsp 0.0.2pre26, and app_rxfax.c from soft-switch.org Both went just fine, and i've checked my libtiff and libxml (along with the devel-s) versions - they're fine. Machine is fedora core 3, x86_64. Asterisk is 1.2.17, zaptel 1.2.15 Dialing in on a zap channel. T1 PRI, esf,b8zs TE110P
2006 Jan 12
1
R: app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so
I have to re-compile also app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so or just spandsp ? Thanks Giordano ________________________________ Da: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Per conto di Colin Anderson Inviato: gioved? 12 gennaio 2006 17.20 A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
2006 Jan 12
6
app_rxfax.so and app_txfax.so
Hi, I just installed spandsp 0.0.3pre6 with libtiff 3.7.1 and evrythinghs is ok. I recompiled asterisk and run ldocnfig, but whrn I start asterisk I get this error: [app_rxfax.so]Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: undefined symbol: fax_set_phase_d_handler Jan 12 16:40:42 WARNING[1569]: loader.c:440 load_modules: Loading
2008 Jan 08
3
app_rxfax.c and app_txxfax.c where?
Hi All, Where can I find copies of the app_rxfax.c, app_txfax.c and apps_Makefile.patch. They don't seem to be located at soft-switch.org anymore. I am currently trying to compile Asterisk 1.2.26.1 and need the fax components. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2004 Jan 15
1
Strange sound when fax answers (app_rxfax)
Hi! I am struggling around with * and the spandsp library (app_rxfax) for a couple of days. I'm trying to receive faxes which come via a SIP gateway. The rxfax-module answers the call, the reception of faxes, however, still does not work correctly, the received file is only about 300 bytes of size, because the sending fax machine is terminating the transmission. Now I've figured out
2007 Jun 15
4
app_rxfax vs (iaxmodem+hylafax)
can anybody help me to choose the most reliable fax solution for * . after googling the net i found that there are at least two solutions for this, app_rxfax+spandsp and iaxmodem+hylafax. - what's the differences between these two? - which one's better? why? thanks
2007 Aug 07
6
Which spandsp & unicall version to use with 1.2?
Hi all, Anyone have an idea which version of spandsp, libunicall, libmfcr2, libsupertone, app_rxfax/app_txfax and chan_unicall I should use for the latest asterisk 1.2? Would that be the ones listed below? http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre4.tgz http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/test-apps-asterisk-1.2/
2008 Dec 22
1
Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4with Lenny
JFYI - I run (successfully) agx-addons with 1.4.22 and Etch. Make sure you have the right version of SpanDSP installed (as well as the tiff libraries). -->> -----Original Message----- -->> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- -->> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Loic Didelot -->> Sent: 19 December 2008 20:33
2007 May 04
3
app_txfax, app_rxfax
Hello, I'm trying to compile asterisk from source (1.2.18). Faxing is fairly critical for us, so in the past we've used spandsps app_rxfax and app_txfax to support faxing in asterisk. Unfortunately I can't find these applications on soft-switch.org anymore and even so I have a feeling they wouldn't patch correctly into 1.2.18. Does anyone know how to best handle faxing in
2009 Feb 03
1
app_rxfax.c: Channel T30 DONE < 0 -- incommplete fax reception.
Hi, all. I'm getting a lot of [Feb 3 13:56:36] WARNING[3721] /usr/src/asterisk/spandsp/agx-ast-addons/app_rxfax.c: Channel T30 DONE < 0. in my log file, and incomplete fax reception. Any idea what might be going on? I've googled a fair bit, but haven't seen anything leap out at me. Thanks, -Ken
2007 Jun 11
1
Crashes with Spandsp, app_rxfax.c, and asterisk 1.4.4
Hi everybody, I have a Fedora Core 4 x86 32 bit install, which I recently upgraded from asterisk 1.2 to the office 1.4.4 tarball. In the process of doing that I had to upgrade some autoconf/automake stuff, but it worked fine, and my new asterisk works fine. Except that anytime I receive a fax with spandsp and app_rxfax, asterisk seg faults. I have applied the spandsp
2008 Dec 22
2
Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4withLenny
...described in the README file ;). SpanDSP - 0.0.4 pre 16 LibTiff - >= 3.8 but <4.0 I had to trawl around for the right SpanDSP - but I can e-mail a copy to whomever wants one (drop me a personal e-mail and I'll attach it by return) HTH Andy -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
2009 Jan 07
1
app_rxfax and app_txfax with Ubuntu?
Hi, all. I just tried to fire up app_txfax and app_rxfax, only to find that I can't seem to compile them. The problem appears to be that my libtiff library is wrong. Only problem is that, according to the README, I need "libtiff >=3.8 and <4.0", which is all well and good... except that there is no 3.x libtiff anywhere in the Ubuntu repository (that I can find, at any rate).
2008 Dec 17
2
Install app_rxfax and app_txfax in 1.4 with Lenny
Hi, I've read README file in agx-ast-addons-1.4.17.5.tar.bz2 It says "Install libTiff >=3.8 and <4.0" Should you really use this agx-ast-addons to get app_rxfax and app-_txfax running with latest 1.4.22 ? If positive, should you take this libtiff warning into account ? If positive, where can you find such libtiff version as Debian repository (I didn't check alternate
2005 Jan 06
3
spandsp and app_rxfax (alternative topic: t38modem)
Dear gods of the PBX (flattery works here, right?) - I've been pulling my hair out trying to get Asterisk to receive and decode a fax using spandsp and app_rxfax. It seems like it should be working. The fax machine on the other end connects and Asterisk reports a fax coming in. But when it's done all I have is a 2 or 3 KB TIF (see attachment). The console activity looks completely
2007 Apr 23
1
app_rxfax produces "RTP: Received packet with bad UDP checksum"
I have tried to set up app_rxfax to receive faxes over IP. I realise there are mixed stories about how reliable this is at the best of times, but at this point all I'm after is some guidance in interpreting the log below. What does "RTP: Received packet with bad UDP checksum" suggest? Here is the full log: -- Executing SetVar("SIP/0892130888-b27c",
2006 May 07
0
app_rxfax problem on 1.2.6
Hi! I'm using freepbx, with * 1.2.6, everything is working nice, except fax handling. the incoming faxes got received: May 6 23:24:39 DEBUG[12505] app_rxfax.c: ============================================================================== May 6 23:24:39 DEBUG[12505] app_rxfax.c: Pages transferred: 1 May 6 23:24:39 DEBUG[12505] app_rxfax.c: Image size: 1728 x 1116 May 6 23:24:39
2006 Feb 19
2
spandsp 0.0.2pre25
Hello, Is anyone successfully using spandsp 0.0.2pre25 with either asterisk 1.0.x or 1.2.4? I've built a Gentoo ebuild for this version of spandsp and app_rtxfax, and it builds, but I'm not having any luck getting it working. 99% of my test faxes fail. Reverting to 0.0.2pre20 yields a much higher success rate. I've bumped the console debugging level in logger.conf to include debug
2007 Jan 22
4
Problems with rxfax
Dear list, The company I'm working for is trying to use app_rxfax to receive faxes on an Asterisk machine. Our initial tests looked very promising, but unfortunately we've encountered some problems. We've been trying to solve these problems for quite some time now, but we're running out of options. So I really hope that somebody can give some help here. Basically our set-up is