similar to: Peer to Peer calls

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Peer to Peer calls"

2005 Jun 06
1
Quotation request: 12 KHz signal generation for billing purposes.
Could anyone quote a price for the following project. We should be able to generate a specific (say 12Khz) signal at certain intervals (calculated using a price/rate table on a mySQL database) DURING an ongoing conversation. The conversation is to be marked (start and end) with specific signals as well. This is a requirement for special hotel applications where a device counts the signals to
2005 Jun 11
0
Voice quality of Softphones vs. IP Phones an d Gateways.
In our experience, the total cost of softphones(money, reduced sound quality and lower reliability) in a large call center environment is actually greater over time than the cost of a channelbank and cheap analog headphones. We've tried 2 softphones, 2 kinds of SIP VOIP hardphones, 2 kinds of SIP analog adapters and we've tried channelbanks over the last 3 years. Right now we are half done
2004 Jun 01
1
SIP vs. SIP :-(
I'v a sip client and a sip trunk to FWD: [general] port=5060 context=default tos=reliability disallow=all allow=ulaw careinvite=no [freeworlddialup] context=default type=friend username=MYUSERNAME secret=MYPASSWORD host=fwd.pulver.com [igor] type=friend callerid="Me" host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 careinvite=no When i try to call a FWD number from SIP client i obtain a lot of
2006 Jan 27
2
Name/username (sip show peers)
How can I make it more readable? Name/username 601/601 123456789/123456789 voipbuster/abcd 601 = hotline 123456789 = Peter Pan only voipbuster/abcd is easy read/understandable! bye Ronald Wiplinger
2011 Apr 20
1
[IAX] Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
Hi, I have a problem with IAX accounts... I set up a few months ago an Asterisk server, with mysql support to load iax accounts. Settings seems fine because apparently the system works as expected. Yesterday I tried to add another iax account in the iax.conf directly. And I have a problem with this new account (named 444). I can authenticate from 444 to the server, and I can receive calls from
2018 Nov 17
2
Per-write cycle count with ReadAdvance - Do I really need that?
Thanks Andrew. I have tried with recent tblgen, ReadAdvance would not work for multiple latencies. Maybe I should make improvement into tblgen if Pierre-Andre does not have the change anymore. However, I just a little curious about the situation I met. The hardware forwording may fail for different reasons, which different register read may have different latencies, depending both on the register
2004 Aug 07
2
Asterisk : No Sound No Dial
Thanks for taking a look greg and hank. This seems to be getting bettre everyday..help please My sjphone is running on the same box as asterisk...i believe then the red hat firewall should not be a problem. Whenever i dial from CLI i get ######### Executing Goto("OSS/dsp", "default|s|1") in new stack -- Goto (default,s,1) -- Executing Wait("OSS/dsp",
2018 Nov 19
2
Per-write cycle count with ReadAdvance - Do I really need that?
It does not work. I have tried to use the latest master today. But tblgen still give me information like error: Resources are defined for both SchedRead and its alias on processor MyArchModel def : ReadAdvance<MyReadVector, 3, [MyWriteAddVector]>; ^ Unless I change "MyReadVector" to another read like "MyReadVector1", it would not work. Debugging into tblgen, there is
2018 Apr 09
2
Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video
Yes, media is flowing through Asterisk because both client's are behind different NAT's. Do I need to do something special in the Call Flow? Or anything additional to the pjsip.conf? 2018-04-09 16:50 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have an Asterisk 15 with PJSIP behind
2009 Feb 20
1
SIP Proxy behind NAT talkinf to ASterisk with public IP
Setup is: Asterisk --->NAT--> SIP Proxy I have following entry for SIP Proxy in sip.conf [Proxy] type=peer host=Static IP (NAT Firewalls public IP) username=xxxx secret=xxxxx nat=yes???????????????? canreinvite=no???????? qualify=yes Proxy sends a call and I get this error Found no matching peer or user for <NAT's Public IP:70001 NAT is using 70001 as the source port in the
2009 Nov 12
1
solution for NAT issues?
Hi All, I been having issues on my users behind NAT, even if i hard set a specific port on the phone, there are some network that NAT's it out to a different port, in turn, some time later the phone could not be reached by the server. i think because on the server, e.g. the user is still registered on port 49923 but when the request is sent to that port the NAT router does not forward
2012 Dec 31
2
a problem for metafor package
Dear sir or madam I want to know how to use "metafor"package do a meta anlysis, forest plot show the results of whole study and results of two subgroups like this the forest plot show in the attachment. looking forword to your reply Regards and Cheers Xudong Liu School of Public Health and Primary Care The Chinese University of Hong Kong Email: liuxudong at cuhk.edu.hk
2004 Apr 10
5
Newbie Issues => SIP won't stay connected, and IAX Unable to Create Channel
I am terribly sorry to bother the list with such generic and bizarre problems, but I have been racking my brain with these for the last week working on it for at least 60 hours. If anyone can even point me in the right direction I would be eternally grateful. So without further adu here are my woes: I have * (2004-04-09 CVS) running on a P4 1.6Ghz CPU, 512MB RAM, Debian "Sarge", and
2017 Mar 08
1
Suspicious code in net_socket.c
For my opinion, special function not needed, because at first time, oai set to NULL, freeaddrinfo tried to free each ai, until occurance of ai_next == NULL. But it works. Linux, Windows, coordinator with white IP, other nodes behind NAT's (1 or two NAT's, only direct connections allowed). There are some problems with MinGW make, at least - mingw-64 from Fedora 25. 1. No definition for
2011 May 02
0
reg. speex Ie Values
Hi, I'm using the ITU-T P.834 methodology to derive the Ie parameter for Speex. According to the E-model, Ie indicates the degradation in quality of a codec at 0% packet loss. It is a non-negative value: the higher, the worst. Details in ITU-T G.107. Because Speex is multi-rate, we are deriving one Ie parameter for each Speex rate. In our preliminary experiments, we've got a value of
2018 Nov 15
2
Per-write cycle count with ReadAdvance - Do I really need that?
Hi list, I happened to read below thread (written in 3 years ago). I think I may need this ReadAdvance feature to work with my ARCH. It is about the scheduler info which describes reading my ARCH's vector register. There are different latencies since forwarding/bypass appears. I give it as below example: def : WriteRes<WriteVector, [MyArchVALU]> { let Latency = 6; } ... def
2017 Mar 06
2
Suspicious code in net_socket.c
Good afternoon! Module - net_socket.c Function - get_known_addresses --------------------------------------------------- struct addrinfo *nai = xzalloc(sizeof *nai); if(ai) ai->ai_next = nai; ai = nai; -------------------------------------------------- For my opinion, possible causes: 1. Lost trails (ai_next) 2. ai_next not initialized 3. Possible segfault during
2003 Sep 19
7
IAX vs SIP
I wonder how IAX compares to SIP bandwidth-wise? I've tried both over overseas IP connection, and somehow SIP seemed to work better. Peter
2018 Apr 11
2
Asterisk behind NAT Early Media Video
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > I added the bind_rtp_to_media_address=yes on all endpoints but still the > same behaviour. The funny thing is that the G711 audio early media works > and doesn't have that Private IP issue. I was also able to cross check with > chan_sip on Asterisk 15, exactly the same wrong behaviour. See following > capture (PJSIP): As
2005 Jun 11
0
Voice quality of Softphones vs. IP Phones and Gateways.
I've tried almost any softphone available on the market with many different PC, soundcard, headphones combinations. None of them prooved production reliable in a call center environment. I've also tested many IP Phones and Gateways. Even the cheapest one supplies much better quality. Is this a fact or am I missing a point. I would certanly prefer a softphone because of cost and