similar to: Database Usage with Asterisk

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Database Usage with Asterisk"

2005 May 30
3
Asterisk install error ...
Hi; It is my first time to use asterisk I have TDM400 wildcard and 4 FXO Modules when I install asterisk an error occurred Chen_zap.c 2772 : error : "zt_event_dtmfdigit" undeclared Can any body help why this error .. Thanks; Ghassan M. Lama' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2005 May 31
1
Asterisk compailation Error Chan_zap.c
Hi; It is my first time installing an asterisk PBX system . I do have a TDM400 wildcard with 4 FXO moduls on a PC with 3.0GHZ HT CPU and INTEL 915 moatherboard . Fedora C2 Linux as O.S. and I have the latest CVS astreisk , Zaptel and Libpri downloaded the zaptel drivers installation and configuration seems to be fine and the libpri but when I tried to compile and install the asterisk software
2019 Nov 14
2
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Thanks a lot for the reference how to make the regtest. One last question please, if understand this correctly, the --use-ntvfs isnot available by default when installing the Debian package, so I need to compile samba with --with-ntvfs-fileserver to make the option available? On 11/14/19 8:52 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 07:30 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah wrote: >> Hi,
2011 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling
Thank you for the answers, Jakob! That's really informative for someone who is still new to LLVM like me. Please see my responses below. -Ghassan  ________________________________ From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, August 16,
2019 Nov 15
1
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi again, it seems that the configure option (--with-ntvfs-fileserer, --enable-developer) are not available on samba-4.11.2. I get the following error: + --enable-developer --with-ntvfs-fileserver --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --mandir=/usr/share/man/ --sbindir=/usr/sbin/ --bindir=/usr/bin/ --without-systemd --with-statedir=/var/lib/samba --with-cachedir=/var/cache/samba
2019 Nov 14
3
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi, I am trying to get some integration tests running in CI with a software uses samba4 AD for authentication. So basically I would like spin up a build and provision a samba4 AD with some test users and groups non-interactively and test commits and pull requests against the AD. On 11/14/19 8:16 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote:
2013 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3
Hi Renato, Please see my answers below. Thanks -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com>; "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Experimental
2013 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3
On 19 September 2013 17:25, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > Ghassan: You have made me so curious to try other benchmarks in our future > work. Most academic publications on CPU performance though use SPEC. You > can even find some recent publications that are still using SPEC CPU2000! > When I was at AMD in 2009, performance optimization and benchmarking
2011 Apr 12
1
lookup not working properly
Hello! Below is my exmample. "myref" is my reference data frame with columns a and b. "temp" is my data with column c analogous to column a in "myref". I am trying to create a new variable b - in "temp" - that matches values from b in "myref" to values in c. If you look at the resulting data frame (temp - at the bottom), you'll notice that
2006 May 03
3
Huawei EP201S
Has anybody used Huawei EP201S IP phone? I need 9 SIP phones that cost around 100USD, and those phones are one of options. Can anybody suggest anything else that costs around 100USD? -- Tomislav Par?ina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 SIP: tomo@pbx.lama.hr e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr
2006 Oct 18
2
Digium on Dell PowerEdge 1850
Does anybody have Digium TE212P interface card on Dell PowerEdge 1850? I'm planning to install * on that configuration so I'm looking for any positive/negative experience. Best regards, -- Tomislav Par?ina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)270248 Mob.: +385(91)1212148 SIP: tomo@sip.lama.hr e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr http://www.lama.hr
2006 Nov 15
2
T38 problem
I have problem with fax machine Panasonic DX600. It's connected to Grandstream Handy Tone 386 which is connected to Asterisk. Asterisk is connected to my SIP provider. To some numbers I can't send FAX, and I get following error on CLI. WARNING[2237] chan_sip.c: Unknown SDP media type in offer: image 31358 udptl t38 I believe that Panasonic DX600 machine supports T38. And when I have
2006 Apr 27
2
Transfer - context/priority
Hi list! When I'm doing transfer, to what context/priority does that call goes? Can it be changed? Is it the same for blind_tr/att_tr/and for transfer that appears when phone replies with - 302 "Moved Temporarily"? The thing is that I'm trying to transfer incoming call from E1 interface back to E1 interface. Transfers will occur when user is going out and sets up all call
2011 Sep 26
1
[LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM
Hi Andy, Please see my in-line answers below. Regards -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM On Sep 23, 2011, at
2019 Nov 14
2
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the
2006 Apr 21
2
Modem connection
I have asterisk connected to E1 interface with Digium TE110P. I have Cisco ATA 186 and fax pass thru well. I have tried to establish modem connection (from computer connected to ATA => SIP => * => E1 => Telco => pstn => another modem) and I do connect (at 14,400) but connection end after a minute. How to establish successfully modem connection? Has anybody tried innovaphone IP21
2013 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3
On 17 September 2013 19:04, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > We have done some experimental evaluation of the different schedulers in > LLVM 3.3 (source, BURR, ILP, fast, MI). The evaluation was done on x86-64 > using SPEC CPU2006. We have measured both the amount of spill code as well > as the execution time as detailed below. > Hi Ghassan, This is an
2013 Sep 26
2
[LLVMdev] Enabling MI Scheduler on x86 (was Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3)
So, when the MI scheduler is enabled, will SD scheduling be totally disabled or the SD scheduler will be automatically set to do source scheduling? -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Cc: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:24 AM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]
2006 Nov 16
2
T.38 - make conclusion
This is one long letter about T.38 and Asterisk. I hope it will help me, and lots of other Asterisk users to understand some T.38 problems with Asterisk. This is my situation: I have Panasonic DX600 FAX machine. It's connected to Asterisk 1.2.13 thru ATA adapter (I have used both, Cisco 186 and Grandstream HandyTone 386). Asterisk is connected with my SIP provider. That link that my provider
2012 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] -march and -mtune options on x86
Which options are you seeing that cause the largest difference, and on which targets? As Chandler mentioned there has been a large amount of variation in x86 targets, and there are certain optimizations that can be done, on say a Pentium (scheduling instructions which are pairable and non-dependent so the U and V pipelines are saturated without contention, for example) that don't make sense