similar to: Traffic shaping for IAX and SIP calls through Asterisk?

Hi all, ive got wondershaper working well with the highest download while maintaing minimal latency but the problem is this: ive got 2 nics in the linux router eth0 and eth1. eth1= internet interface but this is connected to a router say 10.0.0.190, now off that router there are other servers, mail server, domino server etc now if i shape on eth1 ingress and egress using the wondershaper script

Hi ! I found an excellent article about QoS and traffic shaping for VoIP (Asterisk IAX protocol), which is designed to improve sound quality even over very busy lines. http://www.howtoforge.com/voip_qos_traffic_shaping_iproute2_asterisk Should I just cut and paste all that to shorewall''s tcrules (replacing 4569 with 5060)? Additionally, author of this article uses IAX protocol,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! when I activate wondershaper on my dsl connection (pppoa vc mux), i get three errors: # sh -x /usr/sbin/wshaper ppp0 + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_downlink + DOWNLINK= + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_uplink + UPLINK= + [ -z ] + cat /proc/avalanche/avsar_modem_stats + grep Connection Rate + awk {printf("%d", $8)} +

Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc

Hi, I have a PC that acts as a VoIP gateway using an internet telephony provider to make phone calls.. Data between me and the provider will always be from one IP address on my internal network to the provider.. I have a 1Mbps/256Kbps ADSL line and the voice stream is highly compressed requireing only 30Kbps of bandwidth.. The problem is that when my Mozilla Mail client polls for mail or

I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

This was so interesting I had to move it to its own thread! Is anyone using this script? How does it perform compared to the older WonderShaper script? -M- ================== Thanks Kristian I will checkout the new script and see how it goes! Jonn -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at

Greetings list, Thanks to all who replied to my thread a few days ago "SIP devices with packet loss tolerance". One of the suggestions that came out of that thread was to replace routers at users' premises with ones that support QoS. I've used m0n0wall's QoS in the past with reasonable success, but it's quite a bulky and complex setup for deploying to remote sites which

Hi I''m using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect scheduling. By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead in the scheduling algorithms. http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/ Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply on 2.4.29 kernel and 2.6.9 TC. I use centos4 with a 2.6 kernel, so I can''t try these easily. Thanks

I''m trying to setup traffic shaping on my linux gateway/router. The system has 3 interfaces: eth0 - My LAN - with IP address 192.168.0.254 eth1 - The ethernet connection to which my ADSL modem is connected. This has a 10.25.x.x IP, more on this later. The ADSL link has an upstream of ~1.2mbit. ppp0 - The PPP connection which is my WAN connection, with a real world IP. The system acts

Hi, Has anyone done anything with the Linux advanced routing stuff to give SIP and IAX traffic priority? What I have in mind is a high-pri queue for voip traffic, all the rest in another queue that gives way to the VOIP stuff. Thanks, Steve

On 15/12/17 07:05, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I came across this on the Fedora devel list. I added > /etc/sysctl.d/51-bufferbloat.conf containing the suggested line and it > installs the new codel qdisc as desired. There's probably more knobs > that might be useful to tweak but this makes a good start. More reading > on the bufferbloat site suggests that the later "cake"

Hi, I''m a complete newbie at this traffic shaping / QoS stuff so please excuse me if this is a silly question. I''ve searched and searched on Google and I just end up confusing myself even more, so I thought I''d post my question to this list and see whether someone can help me! Basically, I am running a Linux box as a NAT router on my home network (machine name marvin).

Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download. However,

Anyone know if it''s possible to interleave two IP packets when using PPPoA and VC based lines? Can it be done with any PPPoE implementations? The goal is to reduce the delay when you have a high priority packet waiting, but a lower priority (large) packet already started going out ahead of this packet. I don''t want the overhead of much smaller MTU, which is the other way

I don''t know whether this is the right place to ask, but kindly point me to an FM that I can R if it isn''t. My wife is creating lots of Kazaa traffic, and I am using rsync to create a full mirror of Red Hat''s FTP site, Aurora Linux FTP site, the LDP site, and some other stuff. Clearly, when one is moving well over 100GB over a 128 Kbps link, this is going to take a

From: User Lists <clopmz at yahoo.com> > Thak you for your responses. > I will use CentOS-3 as a firewall.. Nothing against CentOS as a firewall, but you might consider a distro that is more focused as a plop'n drop "security applicance" distro: http://www.ipcop.org 4-zone segmentation (WAN, DMZ, LAN, WLAN) Integrated real-time and statistical logging, Snort IDS,

Hi, Does anybody else have problems like this. I'm in the UK with a 1mb ADSL service from Eclipse. I have a Draytek Vigour 2600 ADSL router. My * box is configured with a public IP address which is presented on one of the switch ports on the rear of the router. When there is some SIP activity, incoming mainly, towards my * box, the router will lockup after a short period?! I've tried

I have wondershaper to limit my upload at 400kilobits (my line is 600kbps). I do a lot of torrent seeding and I dont want my pings killed when I''m uploading so I set low prority source ports as follows (by the way, I have bittornet to only use ports 6881-6910): NOPRIOPORTSRC="6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901