similar to: Bridge stops bridging channels SIP

Hi All I’m facing problem in bridging two SIP channels . I’m having SIP Trunk with Service Provider. Whenever I make any international call it get through and after some seconds it give error “Bridge stops bridging channels SIP/XXXX-3be3 and SI P/primus-9381” & call drops. May 13 17:25:19 VERBOSE[7491]: -- SIP/primus-9381 is making progress passing it to SIP/7125-3be3 May 13

Hi, We are using Vicidial and sometime even when agent disconnects, outgoing call originated by dialer is still active. Since call was initiated by dialer and then bought into meetme conference of agent and we can't corelate this call to any agent channel. When agents are dialing, channels doesn't show calls vicidial2*CLI> show channels Channel Location

If you look at the specs on the Dlink box that Primus gives you, you will see that it is SIP. I am sure Primus has a SIP platform because we have played with it. We managed to use it on MSN's SIP phone as well as couple Zultys ZIP2x2 hard phones. Their PC-Phone app is also a SIP soft phone. If you are registering to sip.iprimus.net then it is definitely their SIP platyform not MGCP.

I am sure Primus has a SIP platform because we have played with it. We managed to use it on MSN's SIP phone as well as couple Zultys ZIP2x2 hard phones. Their PC-Phone app is also a SIP soft phone. If you are registering to sip.iprimus.net then it is definitely their SIP platyform not MGCP. David >>> asterisk-users@eol.ca 1/21/2004 6:39:34 AM >>> I'm not sure Primus

Hello, I have 2 Dell 1955 blade servers, running RHEL5-Xen. I''m testing the migrate functionality from one blade to another. I can start the domain, move it to one blade (minor delay/packet loss) and everything is fine. When I try to move it back to the original blade the migration fails and the DomU crashes c1b1 = Blade 1 (192.168.131.201) c1b2 = Blade 2

Primus in Canada has launched a SIP-based service to replace your business and residential POTS lines with a VoIP version. It's called TalkBroadband and it looks killer: http://www.primus.ca/en/residential/talkbroadband/index.html Basic service for $20 Cdn a month!! Local number portability!! Cheapo Primus LD rates!! They don't care where geographically you plug it in!! When you sign

Hi, I have the setup of my xp100 plugging into my dlink gateway that i use with a voip provider. I notice that when someone calls my pstn # that goes to the asterisk box it works but when they hang up asterisk does not recognize the hangup. What needs to be done to make it work with a dlink gateway. when i plug the xp100 into my land line jack everything works fine and the xp100 reconizes

Hi all, A while back, there was a short thread on using the FXS interface from a Primus TalkBroadBand device (a DLink ATA) as a incoming line for the FXO interface on the TDM400P: Primus <--> DLink ATA FXS <--> TDM400P FXO <--> Asterisk In that thread, a couple of people suggested that this does not work reliabley, and the ATA FXS <--> TDM FXO link 'goes

hello, i have a config that is with a large domain of rate, from 2kb to 40Mb and i have some problems with i don''t know how to deal with. so here are some classes 2 with q=1000, one with q 200000 and one with q=6400, all have been calculated by htb, in the code i speficien just rate,ceil, no quantum, no r2q, no bursts ($tc class add $IF_INT parent 1:2 classid 1:21 htb rate

Hey, I've checked all over and can't find what I need to know, so I'm posting here. I want to use Asterisk with my Primus VoIP service but it seems I need a username and password to authenticate with at Primus. Has anyone had any experience with this? How did you get it? Is it stored somewhere in the D-Link gateway they gave me? Thanks in advance and sorry if this makes no sense.

Hi list, For a client I am setting up a system which will use T1 PRI from Primus, who offer only NI-1 and NI-2 protocols for D-Channels. Previousely I have only used switchtypes euroISDN and National. Although the documentation says Asterisk does support NI-1 ans NI-2, but wanted to get your opinion if you have used these protocols on an Asterisk box and if there were any things to consider. If

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75199 Priority: medium Bug ID: 75199 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: unsupported GT620M in Samsung All-in-One PC DP500A2D QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: slappinjohn

Great, thanks! Il 5 giu 2017 6:49 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha scritto: > The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 > > -Krutika > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < > gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Great news. >> Is this planned to be published in next

Hi Krutika, May I kindly ping to you and ask that If you have any idea yet or figured out whats the issue may? I am awaiting your reply with four eyes :) Apologies for the ping :) -Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:06 AM To: 'Krutika

Hi, Sorry i did't confirm the results sooner. Yes, it's working fine without issues for me. If anyone else can confirm so we can be sure it's 100% resolved. -- Respectfully Mahdi A. Mahdi ________________________________ From: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:17:40 AM To: Mahdi Adnan Cc: gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay

Hi, Sorry for the late response. No, so eager-lock experiment was more to see if the implementation had any new bugs. It doesn't look like it does. I think having it on would be the right thing to do. It will reduce the number of fops having to go over the network. Coming to the performance drop, I compared the volume profile output for stripe and 32MB shard again. The only thing that is

Any additional tests would be great as a similiar bug was detected and fixed some months ago and after that, this bug arose?. Is still unclear to me why two very similiar bug was discovered in two different times for the same operation How this is possible? If you fixed the first bug, why the second one wasn't triggered on your test environment? Il 6 giu 2017 10:35 AM, "Mahdi

The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 -Krutika On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. > Is this planned to be published in next release? > > Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha > scritto: > >> Thanks for that update.

Krutika, I?m sorry I forgot to add logs. I attached them now. Thanks, Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 10:27 AM To: 'Krutika Dhananjay' <kdhananj at redhat.com> Cc: 'gluster-user' <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re:

Hi Abi Can you please share your current transfer speeds after you made the change? Thank you. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Ben Turner <bturner at redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech at gmail.com> > > To: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> > > Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay"